Persistent olfactory learning deficits during and post-COVID-19 infection

Rajdeep Bhowmik , Meenakshi Pardasani , Sarang Mahajan , Rahul Magar , Samir V. Joshi , Ganesh Ashish Nair , Anindya S. Bhattacharjee , Nixon M. Abraham
{"title":"Persistent olfactory learning deficits during and post-COVID-19 infection","authors":"Rajdeep Bhowmik ,&nbsp;Meenakshi Pardasani ,&nbsp;Sarang Mahajan ,&nbsp;Rahul Magar ,&nbsp;Samir V. Joshi ,&nbsp;Ganesh Ashish Nair ,&nbsp;Anindya S. Bhattacharjee ,&nbsp;Nixon M. Abraham","doi":"10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying olfactory impairments can facilitate early detection of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite being a debated topic, many reports provide evidence for the neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2. However, a sensitive, specific, and accurate non-invasive method for quantifying persistent neurological impairments is missing to date. To quantify olfactory detectabilities and neurocognitive impairments in symptomatic COVID-19 patients during and post-infection periods, we used a custom-built olfactory-action meter (OAM) providing accurate behavioral readouts. Ten monomolecular odors were used for quantifying olfactory detectabilities and two pairs of odors were employed for olfactory matching tests. We followed cohorts of healthy subjects, symptomatic patients, and recovered subjects for probing olfactory learning deficits, before the Coronavirus Omicron variant was reported in India. Our method identifies severe and persistent olfactory dysfunctions in symptomatic patients during COVID-19 infection. Symptomatic patients and recovered subjects showed significant olfactory learning deficits during and post-infection periods, 4–18 months, in comparison to healthy subjects. On comparing olfactory fitness, we found differential odor detectabilities and olfactory function scores in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers. Our results indicate probable long-term neurocognitive deficits in COVID-19 patients imploring the necessity of long-term tracking during post-infection period. Differential olfactory fitness observed in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers demand probing mechanisms of potentially distinct infection routes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72752,"journal":{"name":"Current research in neurobiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/2d/main.PMC9985517.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665945X23000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Quantifying olfactory impairments can facilitate early detection of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite being a debated topic, many reports provide evidence for the neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2. However, a sensitive, specific, and accurate non-invasive method for quantifying persistent neurological impairments is missing to date. To quantify olfactory detectabilities and neurocognitive impairments in symptomatic COVID-19 patients during and post-infection periods, we used a custom-built olfactory-action meter (OAM) providing accurate behavioral readouts. Ten monomolecular odors were used for quantifying olfactory detectabilities and two pairs of odors were employed for olfactory matching tests. We followed cohorts of healthy subjects, symptomatic patients, and recovered subjects for probing olfactory learning deficits, before the Coronavirus Omicron variant was reported in India. Our method identifies severe and persistent olfactory dysfunctions in symptomatic patients during COVID-19 infection. Symptomatic patients and recovered subjects showed significant olfactory learning deficits during and post-infection periods, 4–18 months, in comparison to healthy subjects. On comparing olfactory fitness, we found differential odor detectabilities and olfactory function scores in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers. Our results indicate probable long-term neurocognitive deficits in COVID-19 patients imploring the necessity of long-term tracking during post-infection period. Differential olfactory fitness observed in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers demand probing mechanisms of potentially distinct infection routes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
covid -19感染期间和之后的持续性嗅觉学习缺陷
量化嗅觉障碍可以促进2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)的早期检测。尽管这是一个有争议的话题,但许多报告为严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的神经性提供了证据。然而,迄今为止,尚缺乏一种灵敏、特异、准确的非侵入性方法来量化持续性神经损伤。为了量化有症状的新冠肺炎患者在感染期间和感染后的嗅觉检测能力和神经认知障碍,我们使用了定制的嗅觉动作计(OAM),提供准确的行为读数。使用10种单分子学气味来量化嗅觉检测能力,并使用两对气味进行嗅觉匹配测试。在印度报告冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株之前,我们跟踪了健康受试者、有症状的患者和康复受试者的队列,以探究嗅觉学习缺陷。我们的方法确定了新冠肺炎感染期间有症状患者的严重和持续嗅觉功能障碍。与健康受试者相比,有症状的患者和康复受试者在感染期间和感染后4-18个月表现出显著的嗅觉学习缺陷。通过比较嗅觉适应度,我们发现有症状的患者和无症状携带者的气味检测能力和嗅觉功能得分不同。我们的研究结果表明,新冠肺炎患者可能存在长期神经认知缺陷,因此有必要在感染后进行长期跟踪。在有症状患者和无症状携带者中观察到的不同嗅觉适应度需要探索潜在不同感染途径的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Intranasal insulin attenuates hypoxia-ischemia-induced short-term sensorimotor behavioral disturbances, neuronal apoptosis, and brain damage in neonatal rats Protective effects of Embelin in Benzo[α]pyrene induced cognitive and memory impairment in experimental model of mice Physiological features of parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic interneurons contributing to high-frequency oscillations in the cerebral cortex Hearing loss in juvenile rats leads to excessive play fighting and hyperactivity, mild cognitive deficits and altered neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1