[Suturing basic procedural skills training for medical students during COVID-19 pandemic].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872022001001325
Roberto González L, Sebastián Barra M, MarÍA García-Huidobro D, Patricio Stevens M, Jorge Gajardo J, Diego Saldivia Z, Rodrigo Reyes M, Felipe Alarcãn O, AndrÉS Schaub C, Patricio Madrid C, Alejandro Pérez G, Héctor Molina Z
{"title":"[Suturing basic procedural skills training for medical students during COVID-19 pandemic].","authors":"Roberto González L,&nbsp;Sebastián Barra M,&nbsp;MarÍA García-Huidobro D,&nbsp;Patricio Stevens M,&nbsp;Jorge Gajardo J,&nbsp;Diego Saldivia Z,&nbsp;Rodrigo Reyes M,&nbsp;Felipe Alarcãn O,&nbsp;AndrÉS Schaub C,&nbsp;Patricio Madrid C,&nbsp;Alejandro Pérez G,&nbsp;Héctor Molina Z","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022001001325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adoption of sanitary measures due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic hampered teaching and learning methods in medicine.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To communicate the results of a wound suture training workshop, based on the Basic Procedural Skills Training methodology and adapted to the pandemic context.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred fourteen students were randomized in small groups due to sanitary measures and trained with a modification of the Basic Procedural Skills Training methodology. An informed consent was obtained from every student. The suturing skills were evaluated before and after the intervention with \"The Objective Structured Assessment Of Technical Skills\" (OSATS) instrument. The perception of the workshop and the implementation of the COVID-19 prevention measures were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The students showed a statistically significant improvement after the intervention. In the OSATS verification list, the average score increased from 4.5 to 8.6 (p < 0.01). In the OSATS global scale, the average score increased from 13.0 to 25.3 (p < 0.01). The perception of the workshop and the prevention measures were well evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite all the limitations of the pandemic context, we achieved a significant improvement after the intervention and a very good perception by the students.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022001001325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The adoption of sanitary measures due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic hampered teaching and learning methods in medicine.

Aim: To communicate the results of a wound suture training workshop, based on the Basic Procedural Skills Training methodology and adapted to the pandemic context.

Material and methods: One hundred fourteen students were randomized in small groups due to sanitary measures and trained with a modification of the Basic Procedural Skills Training methodology. An informed consent was obtained from every student. The suturing skills were evaluated before and after the intervention with "The Objective Structured Assessment Of Technical Skills" (OSATS) instrument. The perception of the workshop and the implementation of the COVID-19 prevention measures were also evaluated.

Results: The students showed a statistically significant improvement after the intervention. In the OSATS verification list, the average score increased from 4.5 to 8.6 (p < 0.01). In the OSATS global scale, the average score increased from 13.0 to 25.3 (p < 0.01). The perception of the workshop and the prevention measures were well evaluated.

Conclusions: Despite all the limitations of the pandemic context, we achieved a significant improvement after the intervention and a very good perception by the students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【新冠肺炎大流行期间医学生缝合基本操作技能训练】。
背景:sars - cov大流行导致的卫生措施的采取阻碍了医学教学方法。目的:传播基于基本程序技能培训方法并适应大流行背景的伤口缝合培训讲习班的结果。材料和方法:根据卫生措施,将114名学生随机分成小组,采用修改后的基本程序技能训练方法进行训练。获得了每位学生的知情同意。采用“技术技能客观结构化评估”(OSATS)仪对干预前后的缝合技能进行评估。还对讲习班的观感和新冠肺炎预防措施的实施情况进行了评估。结果:学生在干预后表现出显著的改善。在OSATS验证列表中,平均得分从4.5分提高到8.6分(p < 0.01)。在OSATS全球范围内,平均得分从13.0分上升到25.3分(p < 0.01)。对车间的认识和预防措施进行了很好的评价。结论:尽管大流行背景存在种种局限性,但我们在干预后取得了显著的改善,学生们也有了很好的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
[Being Depressed or Having Depression. The biomedical model and the difference between mood and illness]. Chronic angina secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Report of one case. [Single-pass albumin dialysis as treatment of acute on chronic liver failure during COVID-19 pneumonia. report of one case]. [The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers]. [Knowing better, knowing the why, and knowing how to do: assumptions of depression in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1