Struggles Against Mining in Brazil: Framing Disputes and Tensions in Civil Society.

Filipe M Motta
{"title":"Struggles Against Mining in Brazil: Framing Disputes and Tensions in Civil Society.","authors":"Filipe M Motta","doi":"10.1007/s10767-023-09451-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper seeks to characterise the relationship between civil society and mining in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between 2000 and 2020 by observing the actions of three different groups in resisting the expansion of mining. The analysis points to the existence of a plurality of forms of engagement, organisation and ways of establishing relations between civil society and the state and the market. It also reveals tension between different ways of framing the mining problem by civil society, of posing this problem publicly and establishing ways to confront it. Three sets of actors are identified: (i) environmental NGOs, who are market-oriented; (ii) groups with looser ties who are more radical; and (iii) social movements aligned with the identities of a state-orientated traditional left. My analysis suggests that the divergence in framing the context by these three different groups hinders the construction of a substantive public debate on the mining issue in Brazil. The article is divided into three parts. First, it briefly outlines the process of mining expansion in Brazil, starting in the mid-2000s, highlighting its economic impact. Second, it considers the relationship between civil society articulation and deliberation. Third, it characterises the constitution of these different civil society groups who have established interactions with market and state actors that fostered this expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":45635,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Politics Culture and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157562/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Politics Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09451-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper seeks to characterise the relationship between civil society and mining in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between 2000 and 2020 by observing the actions of three different groups in resisting the expansion of mining. The analysis points to the existence of a plurality of forms of engagement, organisation and ways of establishing relations between civil society and the state and the market. It also reveals tension between different ways of framing the mining problem by civil society, of posing this problem publicly and establishing ways to confront it. Three sets of actors are identified: (i) environmental NGOs, who are market-oriented; (ii) groups with looser ties who are more radical; and (iii) social movements aligned with the identities of a state-orientated traditional left. My analysis suggests that the divergence in framing the context by these three different groups hinders the construction of a substantive public debate on the mining issue in Brazil. The article is divided into three parts. First, it briefly outlines the process of mining expansion in Brazil, starting in the mid-2000s, highlighting its economic impact. Second, it considers the relationship between civil society articulation and deliberation. Third, it characterises the constitution of these different civil society groups who have established interactions with market and state actors that fostered this expansion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西反对采矿的斗争:界定民间社会的争端和紧张局势。
本文试图通过观察三个不同群体在抵制采矿扩张方面的行动,来描述2000年至2020年间巴西米纳斯吉拉斯民间社会与采矿业之间的关系。分析指出,民间社会与国家和市场之间存在多种形式的参与、组织和建立关系的方式。它还揭示了民间社会界定采矿问题的不同方式、公开提出这一问题和确定应对这一问题的方法之间的紧张关系;(ii)关系松散、更激进的群体;以及(iii)与以国家为导向的传统左派身份相一致的社会运动。我的分析表明,这三个不同群体在界定背景方面的分歧阻碍了在巴西就采矿问题进行实质性公开辩论。文章分为三个部分。首先,它简要概述了巴西从2000年代中期开始的矿业扩张过程,强调了其经济影响。其次,它考虑了民间社会表达和审议之间的关系。第三,它描述了这些不同的民间社会团体的组成,他们与市场和国家行为者建立了互动,促进了这种扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society welcomes original articles on issues arising at the intersection of nations, states, civil societies, and global institutions and processes. The editors are particularly interested in article manuscripts dealing with changing patterns in world economic and political institutions; analysis of ethnic groups, social classes, religions, personal networks, and special interests; changes in mass culture, propaganda, and technologies of communication and their social effects; and the impact of social transformations on the changing order of public and private life. The journal is interdisciplinary in orientation and international in scope, and is not tethered to particular theoretical or research traditions. The journal presents material of varying length, from research notes to article-length monographs.
期刊最新文献
Critical Theory and Climate Change: Collective Subjectivity, Evolution and Modernity Prisons of Poverty and Politics: How Russian Human Rights Workers Embed Themselves in Middle Class Social Movements Masculinity, Citizenship, and Demography: the Rise of Populism Culture of Meritocracy, Political Hegemony, and Singapore’s Development Authorial Power, Authoritarianism, and Exiled Intellectuals: Syria and Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1