Buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-02 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2229609
Robert Nunn, Anne Sylvestre, Kelly Sequeira, Rosa Maria Tanzini
{"title":"Buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Robert Nunn, Anne Sylvestre, Kelly Sequeira, Rosa Maria Tanzini","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2229609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the use of buprenorphine/naloxone micro-inductions in hospitalized patients and characterize the success rate of these inductions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients receiving a buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction for opioid use disorder in a tertiary care hospital from Jan 2020-Dec 2020. The primary outcome was a description of the micro-induction prescribing patterns used. The secondary outcomes were a description of the demographic characteristics of patients, the estimated frequency of withdrawal symptoms experienced by patients undergoing a micro-induction, and the overall success rate of the micro-inductions defined as retention on buprenorphine/naloxone therapy with no precipitated withdrawal experienced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis. Three main micro-induction regimens were identified, including rapid micro-inductions (8 patients), 0.5 mg SL BID initiations (6 patients), and 0.5 mg SL daily initiations (19 patients). Twenty-four patients (73%) met the criteria for a successful micro-induction, defined as being retained in buprenorphine/naloxone therapy with no precipitated withdrawal experienced. The most common reason for micro-induction failure was patient request to discontinue buprenorphine/naloxone therapy due to perceived adverse effects or personal preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction in hospitalized patients resulted in a majority of patients being successfully initiated on buprenorphine/naloxone therapy without requiring opioid abstinence prior to induction. Dosing regimens were variable, and the ideal regimen remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"345-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2229609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the use of buprenorphine/naloxone micro-inductions in hospitalized patients and characterize the success rate of these inductions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients receiving a buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction for opioid use disorder in a tertiary care hospital from Jan 2020-Dec 2020. The primary outcome was a description of the micro-induction prescribing patterns used. The secondary outcomes were a description of the demographic characteristics of patients, the estimated frequency of withdrawal symptoms experienced by patients undergoing a micro-induction, and the overall success rate of the micro-inductions defined as retention on buprenorphine/naloxone therapy with no precipitated withdrawal experienced.

Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis. Three main micro-induction regimens were identified, including rapid micro-inductions (8 patients), 0.5 mg SL BID initiations (6 patients), and 0.5 mg SL daily initiations (19 patients). Twenty-four patients (73%) met the criteria for a successful micro-induction, defined as being retained in buprenorphine/naloxone therapy with no precipitated withdrawal experienced. The most common reason for micro-induction failure was patient request to discontinue buprenorphine/naloxone therapy due to perceived adverse effects or personal preference.

Conclusion: Buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction in hospitalized patients resulted in a majority of patients being successfully initiated on buprenorphine/naloxone therapy without requiring opioid abstinence prior to induction. Dosing regimens were variable, and the ideal regimen remains unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家三级医院的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮微量导入:回顾性队列分析。
目的描述在住院患者中使用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮微量诱导的情况,并描述这些诱导的成功率:我们对一家三甲医院 2020 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮微量注射治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的住院患者进行了回顾性病历审查。主要结果是描述所使用的微量诱导处方模式。次要结果是描述患者的人口统计学特征、接受微量诱导的患者出现戒断症状的估计频率,以及微量诱导的总体成功率,微量诱导的定义是保留丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗,且未出现沉淀性戒断:共有 33 名患者参与分析。确定了三种主要的微量诱导方案,包括快速微量诱导(8 名患者)、0.5 毫克 SL BID 诱导(6 名患者)和 0.5 毫克 SL 每日诱导(19 名患者)。24名患者(73%)达到了微量诱导成功的标准,即继续接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗,且未出现沉淀性戒断。微量诱导失败的最常见原因是患者因认为有不良反应或个人偏好而要求停止丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗:结论:在住院患者中进行丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮微量诱导,大多数患者都能成功开始接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗,而无需在诱导前戒断阿片类药物。给药方案各不相同,理想的方案仍不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
"Smoker" and "Vaper" identity in people who use both cigarettes and E-cigarettes: Changes over time and associations with smoking behaviors. Cannabis flower, concentrates, and edibles: a narrative review comparing prevalence of use, methods of consumption, and cannabis use disorder outcomes. A mixed-method exploration of #vapingcessation videos on TikTok. Buprenorphine prescription and treatment initiation through preemptive outreach and telehealth consultation with emergency medicine providers. Co-occurring pain and addiction: prognostic implications for healthcare professionals in residential treatment for substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1