Task-Relevant Smartphone Messages Within Work Zones: A Driving Simulation Study.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/00187208231167641
Curtis M Craig, Disi Tian, Nichole L Morris
{"title":"Task-Relevant Smartphone Messages Within Work Zones: A Driving Simulation Study.","authors":"Curtis M Craig, Disi Tian, Nichole L Morris","doi":"10.1177/00187208231167641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the impact of in-vehicle messages relative to roadside messages to alert drivers to events within a simulated work zone, in order to determine if these messages can improve driving performance within the work zone.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Safety risks in work zones are usually mitigated by design standards and clear signage to communicate work zone information to drivers. Due to distraction and other driving task demands, these signs are not always noticed by motorists, nor are they always followed when they are noticed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The driving simulation tested drivers in two different types of work zones, shoulder work, and lane closure. Participants drove through these work zones three times, each with different messaging interfaces to communicate hazardous events to the driver. The interfaces included a roadside, portable changeable message sign, a smartphone presenting only auditory messages, and a smartphone presenting audio-visual messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significantly better driving performance on key metrics including lane deviation for the in-vehicle message conditions relative to the roadside signs. Furthermore, drivers directed visual attention toward the roadway for the in-vehicle message conditions relative to the roadside sign condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that in-vehicle messaging could provide benefits to primary task performance in driving if the message content is appropriately designed.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>The findings provide support for a design framework to support in-vehicle communication to drivers approaching work zones and other environments to safely alert them to hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231167641","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the impact of in-vehicle messages relative to roadside messages to alert drivers to events within a simulated work zone, in order to determine if these messages can improve driving performance within the work zone.

Background: Safety risks in work zones are usually mitigated by design standards and clear signage to communicate work zone information to drivers. Due to distraction and other driving task demands, these signs are not always noticed by motorists, nor are they always followed when they are noticed.

Method: The driving simulation tested drivers in two different types of work zones, shoulder work, and lane closure. Participants drove through these work zones three times, each with different messaging interfaces to communicate hazardous events to the driver. The interfaces included a roadside, portable changeable message sign, a smartphone presenting only auditory messages, and a smartphone presenting audio-visual messages.

Results: There was significantly better driving performance on key metrics including lane deviation for the in-vehicle message conditions relative to the roadside signs. Furthermore, drivers directed visual attention toward the roadway for the in-vehicle message conditions relative to the roadside sign condition.

Conclusion: The results indicate that in-vehicle messaging could provide benefits to primary task performance in driving if the message content is appropriately designed.

Application: The findings provide support for a design framework to support in-vehicle communication to drivers approaching work zones and other environments to safely alert them to hazards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作区内与任务相关的智能手机信息:模拟驾驶研究
研究目的本研究探讨了车载信息和路边信息对提醒驾驶员注意模拟工作区内事件的影响,以确定这些信息是否能提高驾驶员在工作区内的驾驶表现:背景:工作区内的安全风险通常通过设计标准和清晰的标志牌向驾驶员传达工作区信息来降低。由于分心和其他驾驶任务的要求,驾驶员并不总是注意到这些标志,即使注意到了也不一定会遵守:模拟驾驶测试了驾驶员在两种不同类型的施工区(路肩施工和车道封闭)中的驾驶情况。参与者驾车经过这些工作区三次,每次都有不同的信息界面向驾驶员传达危险事件。这些界面包括路边的便携式可更换信息标志、只显示听觉信息的智能手机和显示视听信息的智能手机:结果:在车载信息条件下,包括车道偏离在内的关键指标的驾驶性能明显优于路边标志。此外,相对于路边标志,车内信息条件下驾驶员将视觉注意力集中在道路上:结论:研究结果表明,如果信息内容设计得当,车载信息可以为驾驶员的主要任务表现带来益处:研究结果为设计框架提供了支持,该框架支持向接近工作区和其他环境的驾驶员发送车载信息,以安全地提醒他们注意危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Tunneling in Pilots During a Visual Tracking Task With a Head Mounted Display. Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability. An Automobile's Tail Lights: Sacrificing Safety for Playful Design? Virtual Reality Adaptive Training for Personalized Stress Inoculation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1