Comparative evaluation of cleaning efficiency of single file NiTi rotary system during root canal treatment procedure - A scanning electron microscope study.

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-16 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_52_23
Ruchi Vashisht, Umesh Kumar, Swaty Jhamb, Ruchi Singla
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of cleaning efficiency of single file NiTi rotary system during root canal treatment procedure - A scanning electron microscope study.","authors":"Ruchi Vashisht,&nbsp;Umesh Kumar,&nbsp;Swaty Jhamb,&nbsp;Ruchi Singla","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_52_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal biomechanical preparation, thorough irrigation, proper disinfection, and finally, well-sealed obturation is a must to attain definitive success in root canal procedure. Proper preparation of the root canal is all the more imperative to establish a hermetic apical seal with adequately placed filling materials. The present study was conducted for comparing the Cleaning Efficiency of F360 system and the WaveOne Gold (WOG) system of rotary NiTi instrumentation for a root canal.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred freshly extracted noncarious mandibular canines were obtained. Access cavity of standard size was made followed by the establishment of working length. Afterward, random division of all the specimens was done into two study groups: group A: the group in which F360 system was used for instrumentation and group B: the group in which the WOG system was used for instrumentation. Irrigations of all the specimens of both the study groups were done followed by root canal shaping by the instrument system of their respective study groups. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for assessment after specimens were cut buccolingually. Debris score and residual smear layer score were used for assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among group A specimens, the mean smear layer score at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third was 1.76, 2.39, and 2.65, respectively. Among group B specimens, the mean smear layer score at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third was 1.34, 1.59, and 1.92, respectively. While analyzing statistically, it was seen that the mean smear layer score was significantly higher among specimens of group A in comparison to group B. While analyzing statistically, it was seen that the mean debris score was significantly higher among specimens of group A in comparison to group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cleaning effectiveness of WOG instruments was significantly enhanced in comparison to F360 equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 3","pages":"316-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309122/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_52_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Optimal biomechanical preparation, thorough irrigation, proper disinfection, and finally, well-sealed obturation is a must to attain definitive success in root canal procedure. Proper preparation of the root canal is all the more imperative to establish a hermetic apical seal with adequately placed filling materials. The present study was conducted for comparing the Cleaning Efficiency of F360 system and the WaveOne Gold (WOG) system of rotary NiTi instrumentation for a root canal.

Materials and methods: One hundred freshly extracted noncarious mandibular canines were obtained. Access cavity of standard size was made followed by the establishment of working length. Afterward, random division of all the specimens was done into two study groups: group A: the group in which F360 system was used for instrumentation and group B: the group in which the WOG system was used for instrumentation. Irrigations of all the specimens of both the study groups were done followed by root canal shaping by the instrument system of their respective study groups. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for assessment after specimens were cut buccolingually. Debris score and residual smear layer score were used for assessment.

Results: Among group A specimens, the mean smear layer score at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third was 1.76, 2.39, and 2.65, respectively. Among group B specimens, the mean smear layer score at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third was 1.34, 1.59, and 1.92, respectively. While analyzing statistically, it was seen that the mean smear layer score was significantly higher among specimens of group A in comparison to group B. While analyzing statistically, it was seen that the mean debris score was significantly higher among specimens of group A in comparison to group B.

Conclusion: The cleaning effectiveness of WOG instruments was significantly enhanced in comparison to F360 equipment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单锉NiTi旋转系统在根管治疗过程中清洁效率的比较评估——扫描电子显微镜研究。
背景:为了在根管手术中取得最终成功,必须进行最佳的生物力学准备、彻底冲洗、适当消毒,最后进行良好的封闭。根管的适当准备对于用适当放置的填充材料建立密封的根尖密封来说更为重要。本研究旨在比较F360系统和WaveOne-Gold(WOG)系统的旋转NiTi根管器械的清洁效率。材料和方法:获得100只新鲜提取的非龋坏下颌犬科动物。制作标准尺寸的进入腔,然后确定工作长度。然后,将所有标本随机分为两个研究组:A组:F360系统用于仪器的组,B组:WOG系统用于仪器。对两个研究组的所有标本进行灌溉,然后用各自研究组的仪器系统进行根管整形。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对颊舌切除标本进行评价。碎片评分和残留涂抹层评分用于评估。结果:在A组标本中,冠状三分之一、中三分之一和根尖三分之一的平均涂片层得分分别为1.76、2.39和2.65。在B组标本中,冠状三分之一、中三分之一和根尖三分之一的平均涂片层得分分别为1.34、1.59和1.92。在统计分析时发现,与B组相比,A组标本的平均涂片层得分显著更高。在统计分析中,与B组相比,A组标本的平均碎片得分显著更高。结论:与F360设备相比,WOG仪器的清洁效果显著增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Adding Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the Porosity of Calcium Hydroxide Determination of gamma radiation sterilization dose on bioceramic BCP-Sr-Ag as bone graft according to ISO 11137 standards Compressive strength of nanohybrid composite resin after the application of glycerin immersed in fermented milk Differences in the solubility of CaCO3 from blood clam shells and Ca(OH)2 as a candidate pulp capping material Effective Dose of Nano Propolis as Anti-Pain in Animal Models of Mus Musculus Using Writhing Test Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1