Triceps brachii hypertrophy is substantially greater after elbow extension training performed in the overhead versus neutral arm position

Sumiaki Maeo, Yuhang Wu, Meng Huang, Hikaru Sakurai, Yuki Kusagawa, Takashi Sugiyama, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Tadao Isaka
{"title":"Triceps brachii hypertrophy is substantially greater after elbow extension training performed in the overhead versus neutral arm position","authors":"Sumiaki Maeo,&nbsp;Yuhang Wu,&nbsp;Meng Huang,&nbsp;Hikaru Sakurai,&nbsp;Yuki Kusagawa,&nbsp;Takashi Sugiyama,&nbsp;Hiroaki Kanehisa,&nbsp;Tadao Isaka","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2100279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The biarticular triceps brachii long head (TB<sub>Long</sub>) is lengthened more in the overhead than neutral arm position. We compared triceps brachii hypertrophy after elbow extension training performed in the overhead vs. neutral arm position. Using a cable machine, 21 adults conducted elbow extensions (90−0°) with one arm in the overhead (Overhead-Arm) and the other arm in the neutral (Neutral-Arm) position at 70% one-repetition maximum (1RM), 10 reps/set, 5 sets/session, 2 sessions/week for 12 weeks. Training load was gradually increased (+5% 1RM/session) when the preceding session was completed without repetition failure. 1RM of the assigned condition and MRI-measured muscle volume of the TB<sub>Long</sub>, monoarticular lateral and medial heads (TB<sub>Lat+Med</sub>), and whole triceps brachii (Whole-TB) were assessed pre- and post-training. Training load and 1RM increased in both arms similarly (+62−71% at post, <i>P </i>= 0.285), while their absolute values/weights were always lower in Overhead-Arm (-34−39%, <i>P </i>&lt; 0.001). Changes in muscle volume in Overhead-Arm compared to Neutral-Arm were 1.5-fold greater for the TB<sub>Long</sub> (+28.5% vs. +19.6%, Cohen's <i>d </i>= 0.61, <i>P </i>&lt; 0.001), 1.4-fold greater for the TB<sub>Lat+Med</sub> (+14.6% vs. +10.5%, <i>d </i>= 0.39, <i>P </i>= 0.002), and 1.4-fold greater for the Whole-TB (+19.9% vs. +13.9%, <i>d </i>= 0.54, <i>P </i>&lt; 0.001). In conclusion, triceps brachii hypertrophy was substantially greater after elbow extension training performed in the overhead versus neutral arm position, even with lower absolute loads used during the training.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 7","pages":"1240-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2100279","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2100279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The biarticular triceps brachii long head (TBLong) is lengthened more in the overhead than neutral arm position. We compared triceps brachii hypertrophy after elbow extension training performed in the overhead vs. neutral arm position. Using a cable machine, 21 adults conducted elbow extensions (90−0°) with one arm in the overhead (Overhead-Arm) and the other arm in the neutral (Neutral-Arm) position at 70% one-repetition maximum (1RM), 10 reps/set, 5 sets/session, 2 sessions/week for 12 weeks. Training load was gradually increased (+5% 1RM/session) when the preceding session was completed without repetition failure. 1RM of the assigned condition and MRI-measured muscle volume of the TBLong, monoarticular lateral and medial heads (TBLat+Med), and whole triceps brachii (Whole-TB) were assessed pre- and post-training. Training load and 1RM increased in both arms similarly (+62−71% at post, P = 0.285), while their absolute values/weights were always lower in Overhead-Arm (-34−39%, P < 0.001). Changes in muscle volume in Overhead-Arm compared to Neutral-Arm were 1.5-fold greater for the TBLong (+28.5% vs. +19.6%, Cohen's d = 0.61, P < 0.001), 1.4-fold greater for the TBLat+Med (+14.6% vs. +10.5%, d = 0.39, P = 0.002), and 1.4-fold greater for the Whole-TB (+19.9% vs. +13.9%, d = 0.54, P < 0.001). In conclusion, triceps brachii hypertrophy was substantially greater after elbow extension training performed in the overhead versus neutral arm position, even with lower absolute loads used during the training.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在俯卧姿势进行肘部伸展训练后,肱三头肌肥厚明显大于手臂中立姿势
双关节肱三头肌长头(TBLong)在俯卧时比中立臂位时延长得更多。我们比较了在头顶和中立臂位进行肘部伸展训练后肱三头肌肥大的情况。使用拉线机,21名成人进行肘关节伸展(90°- 0°),一只手臂在头顶(overhead - arm),另一只手臂在中立(neutral - arm)位置,以70%的最大单次重复(1RM), 10次/组,5组/组,每周2次/周,持续12周。训练负荷逐渐增加(+5% 1RM/次),当前一次训练完成后没有重复失败。在训练前和训练后评估指定条件的1RM和mri测量的TBLat、单关节外侧和内侧头(TBLat+Med)和整个肱三头肌(whole - tb)的肌肉体积。两臂的训练负荷和1RM增加相似(+62 - 71%,P = 0.285),而它们的绝对值/重量在顶臂总是较低(-34 - 39%,P < 0.001)。与中性组相比,TBLat+Med组肌肉体积变化大1.5倍(+28.5% vs +19.6%, d = 0.61, P < 0.001), TBLat+Med组肌肉体积变化大1.4倍(+14.6% vs +10.5%, d = 0.39, P = 0.002), Whole-TB组肌肉体积变化大1.4倍(+19.9% vs +13.9%, d = 0.54, P < 0.001)。综上所述,即使在训练中使用的绝对负荷较低的情况下,在以头顶姿势进行肘关节伸展训练后,肱三头肌肥大明显大于中性手臂姿势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National-Standard Middle-Distance Runners Maintain 1500 m Time Trial Running Performance on Successive Days. Navigating the Data Processing Maze: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms. The Assessment of the Effect of Gaze Direction Instruction on the Stabilisation During Artistic Gymnastic Landing Physical Characteristics of Fast Roping in British Elite Law Enforcement Officers Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1