Video-based technical feedback and instruction improves tackling technique of community rugby union players

Demi Davidow, Mikeala Watson, Mike Lambert, Ben Jones, Mitchel Smith, Wilbur Kraak, Sharief Hendricks
{"title":"Video-based technical feedback and instruction improves tackling technique of community rugby union players","authors":"Demi Davidow,&nbsp;Mikeala Watson,&nbsp;Mike Lambert,&nbsp;Ben Jones,&nbsp;Mitchel Smith,&nbsp;Wilbur Kraak,&nbsp;Sharief Hendricks","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2160937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aims of this study were to test the change and retention of player's overall tackling technique and technical components following a player-specific video-based technical feedback and instruction intervention on both their dominant and non-dominant shoulders. Twenty-four (<i>n</i> = 24) rugby union players participated in a non-randomized control-intervention, which consisted of a video-based technical feedback and instruction group (video-based technical feedback) and a no video-based technical feedback and instruction group (control). During 3 sessions (baseline, intervention, retention) separated by one week, participants in each group performed six tackles (3 tackles on each shoulder) on a tackle simulator. In total, 432 tackles (video-based technical feedback = 216, control = 216) were analysed. Each tackle was analysed using a standardized list of technical criteria (arbitrary units, AU). For the dominant shoulder, tackling technique scores significantly improved from baseline to intervention for both groups. For the non-dominant shoulder, only the video-based technical feedback group improved their tackling technique from baseline to intervention (baseline 6.89 [6.33–7.45] AU vs. intervention 7.72 [7.35–8.10] AU <i>p</i> = .001, ES = 0.60 <i>moderate</i>). For the retention session, the video-based technical feedback group scored significantly higher than the control group, for dominant (video-based technical feedback 8.00 [7.60–8.40] AU vs. control 7.22 [6.83–7.62] AU <i>p</i> = .014, ES = 0.66 moderate) and non-dominant (video-based technical feedback 8.11 [7.81–8.41] AU vs. control 7.22 [6.90–7.55] <i>p</i> = .004, ES = 0.96 moderate) tackles. This study demonstrates the efficacy of video-based technical feedback as a method to optimize tackle training for player safety and performance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 7","pages":"1121-1130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2160937","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2160937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to test the change and retention of player's overall tackling technique and technical components following a player-specific video-based technical feedback and instruction intervention on both their dominant and non-dominant shoulders. Twenty-four (n = 24) rugby union players participated in a non-randomized control-intervention, which consisted of a video-based technical feedback and instruction group (video-based technical feedback) and a no video-based technical feedback and instruction group (control). During 3 sessions (baseline, intervention, retention) separated by one week, participants in each group performed six tackles (3 tackles on each shoulder) on a tackle simulator. In total, 432 tackles (video-based technical feedback = 216, control = 216) were analysed. Each tackle was analysed using a standardized list of technical criteria (arbitrary units, AU). For the dominant shoulder, tackling technique scores significantly improved from baseline to intervention for both groups. For the non-dominant shoulder, only the video-based technical feedback group improved their tackling technique from baseline to intervention (baseline 6.89 [6.33–7.45] AU vs. intervention 7.72 [7.35–8.10] AU p = .001, ES = 0.60 moderate). For the retention session, the video-based technical feedback group scored significantly higher than the control group, for dominant (video-based technical feedback 8.00 [7.60–8.40] AU vs. control 7.22 [6.83–7.62] AU p = .014, ES = 0.66 moderate) and non-dominant (video-based technical feedback 8.11 [7.81–8.41] AU vs. control 7.22 [6.90–7.55] p = .004, ES = 0.96 moderate) tackles. This study demonstrates the efficacy of video-based technical feedback as a method to optimize tackle training for player safety and performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于视频的技术反馈和指导提高了社区橄榄球联盟球员的处理技术
本研究的目的是测试在对球员的主要和非主要肩膀进行基于视频的技术反馈和指导干预后,球员的整体抢断技术和技术成分的变化和保留。24名橄榄球联盟球员(n = 24)参加了非随机对照干预,其中包括基于视频的技术反馈和指导组(基于视频的技术反馈组)和不基于视频的技术反馈和指导组(对照组)。在为期一周的三个阶段(基线、干预、保留)中,每组参与者在铲球模拟器上进行了6次铲球(每个肩膀上3次铲球)。总共分析了432次铲球(基于视频的技术反馈= 216次,控制= 216次)。每个铲球都使用标准化的技术标准(任意单位,AU)进行分析。对于优势肩,两组的抢断技术得分从基线到干预都有显著提高。对于非优势肩,只有基于视频的技术反馈组从基线到干预期间的抢断技术有所提高(基线6.89 [6.33-7.45]AU vs.干预7.72 [7.35-8.10]AU p =)。001, ES = 0.60,中度)。在保留会话中,基于视频的技术反馈组得分显著高于对照组,优势组(基于视频的技术反馈8.00 [7.60-8.40]AU vs.对照组7.22 [6.83-7.62]AU p =。014, ES = 0.66中度)和非显性(基于视频的技术反馈8.11 [7.81-8.41]AU vs.对照组7.22 [6.90-7.55]p =。004, ES = 0.96(中等)。这项研究证明了基于视频的技术反馈作为一种优化球员安全和表现的铲球训练方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Assessment of the Effect of Gaze Direction Instruction on the Stabilisation During Artistic Gymnastic Landing Physical Characteristics of Fast Roping in British Elite Law Enforcement Officers Issue Information Balance Training: Toward a Comprehensive Understanding and Application of the Overload Principle in Motor Skill Acquisition Distinct Roles of Dopamine and Noradrenaline in Physical Fatigue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1