A comparative study of conventional FRET and light harvesting properties of Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B organic dye pairs impregnated in sol-gel glasses.
{"title":"A comparative study of conventional FRET and light harvesting properties of Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B organic dye pairs impregnated in sol-gel glasses.","authors":"Kapil Dev Mahato, Uday Kumar","doi":"10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two different pairs of laser dyes, Rhodamine-110 (Rh-110)/Rhodamine-6G (Rh-6G) and Rhodamine-19 (Rh-19)/Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) (the first dye in each pair as a donor and the second as an acceptor) were impregnated in silica samples prepared by the sol-gel method and spectroscopically studied using absorption and steady-state fluorescence techniques. The critical transfer distance (R<sub>0</sub>), actual distance (r) between the donor and acceptor, overlap integral [J(υ¯)], FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) efficiency (E), and antenna effect efficiency (AE) were investigated in detail based on the variation in acceptor concentration. The FRET efficiency, antenna effect efficiency, and actual donor-acceptor distance for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B dye pairs corresponding to acceptor concentration ranges (3.83 to 7.65) × 10<sup>-5</sup>M l<sup>-1</sup>and (3.71 to 8.34) × 10<sup>-5</sup>M l<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, were found to be in the ranges of 57.38% to 74.89%, 36.97% to 24.13%, 5.44 nm to 4.77 nm, and 77.01%. Furthermore, maximum FRET efficiencies of 85.68% and 87.63% and antenna effect efficiencies of 36.97% and 40.95% for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B, respectively, were also reported. Our results demonstrate the superior FRET efficiency of Rh-19/Rh-B over Rh-110/Rh-6G dye pair in sol-gel glasses, while the antenna effect efficiency of Rh-110/Rh-6G is higher than that of Rh-19/Rh-B for the same donor to acceptor (D/A) ratio. Finally, Rh-110/Rh-6G is a better energy harvester than the Rh-19/Rh-B dye pair at the common D/A ratio. These results are explained in terms of molecular structure similarity, polarity, and rigidity of donor and acceptor.</p>","PeriodicalId":18596,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Applications in Fluorescence","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Applications in Fluorescence","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Two different pairs of laser dyes, Rhodamine-110 (Rh-110)/Rhodamine-6G (Rh-6G) and Rhodamine-19 (Rh-19)/Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) (the first dye in each pair as a donor and the second as an acceptor) were impregnated in silica samples prepared by the sol-gel method and spectroscopically studied using absorption and steady-state fluorescence techniques. The critical transfer distance (R0), actual distance (r) between the donor and acceptor, overlap integral [J(υ¯)], FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) efficiency (E), and antenna effect efficiency (AE) were investigated in detail based on the variation in acceptor concentration. The FRET efficiency, antenna effect efficiency, and actual donor-acceptor distance for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B dye pairs corresponding to acceptor concentration ranges (3.83 to 7.65) × 10-5M l-1and (3.71 to 8.34) × 10-5M l-1, respectively, were found to be in the ranges of 57.38% to 74.89%, 36.97% to 24.13%, 5.44 nm to 4.77 nm, and 77.01%. Furthermore, maximum FRET efficiencies of 85.68% and 87.63% and antenna effect efficiencies of 36.97% and 40.95% for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B, respectively, were also reported. Our results demonstrate the superior FRET efficiency of Rh-19/Rh-B over Rh-110/Rh-6G dye pair in sol-gel glasses, while the antenna effect efficiency of Rh-110/Rh-6G is higher than that of Rh-19/Rh-B for the same donor to acceptor (D/A) ratio. Finally, Rh-110/Rh-6G is a better energy harvester than the Rh-19/Rh-B dye pair at the common D/A ratio. These results are explained in terms of molecular structure similarity, polarity, and rigidity of donor and acceptor.
期刊介绍:
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence focuses on new developments in fluorescence spectroscopy, imaging, microscopy, fluorescent probes, labels and (nano)materials. It will feature both methods and advanced (bio)applications and accepts original research articles, reviews and technical notes.