Cochlear implant decision-making for children with residual hearing: Perspectives of parents.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2023.2233191
Eunjung Na, Karine Toupin-April, Janet Olds, Dorie Noll, Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick
{"title":"Cochlear implant decision-making for children with residual hearing: Perspectives of parents.","authors":"Eunjung Na, Karine Toupin-April, Janet Olds, Dorie Noll, Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2233191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) decision-making is particularly challenging for families of children who have residual hearing. Parents of these children may be uncertain about whether the potential benefits of CIs outweigh the risks. This study aimed to understand parents' decisional needs during the decision-making process for children with residual hearing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of 11 children who had received CIs. Open-ended questions were asked to encourage parents to share their experiences about the decision-making process, their values/preferences, and their needs. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were organized according to three key themes: (1) Parents' decisional conflict, (2) values and preferences, (3) decision support and parents' needs. We found that overall parents were satisfied with their decision-making process and the decision support from practitioners. However, parents stressed the importance of receiving more personalized information that considers their specific concerns, values and preferences related to family's circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research provides additional evidence to guide the CI decision-making process for children with residual hearing. Additional collaborative research with audiology and decision-making experts specifically on facilitating shared decision-making is needed to provide better decision coaching for these families.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"301-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2023.2233191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) decision-making is particularly challenging for families of children who have residual hearing. Parents of these children may be uncertain about whether the potential benefits of CIs outweigh the risks. This study aimed to understand parents' decisional needs during the decision-making process for children with residual hearing.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of 11 children who had received CIs. Open-ended questions were asked to encourage parents to share their experiences about the decision-making process, their values/preferences, and their needs. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Data were organized according to three key themes: (1) Parents' decisional conflict, (2) values and preferences, (3) decision support and parents' needs. We found that overall parents were satisfied with their decision-making process and the decision support from practitioners. However, parents stressed the importance of receiving more personalized information that considers their specific concerns, values and preferences related to family's circumstances.

Conclusions: Our research provides additional evidence to guide the CI decision-making process for children with residual hearing. Additional collaborative research with audiology and decision-making experts specifically on facilitating shared decision-making is needed to provide better decision coaching for these families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残听儿童人工耳蜗植入决策:家长视角。
目的:人工耳蜗植入(CI)的决策是特别具有挑战性的家庭的孩子有残余听力。这些孩子的父母可能不确定CIs的潜在益处是否大于风险。本研究旨在了解残听儿童在决策过程中父母的决策需求。方法:对11例接受CIs治疗的患儿家长进行半结构式访谈。为了鼓励家长分享他们在决策过程中的经历、他们的价值观/偏好以及他们的需求,他们问了一些开放式的问题。访谈内容逐字记录,并采用专题分析进行分析。结果:数据按照三个关键主题进行整理:(1)父母决策冲突;(2)价值观与偏好;(3)决策支持与父母需求。我们发现,总体而言,家长对他们的决策过程和从业者的决策支持感到满意。然而,家长们强调了接受更多个性化信息的重要性,这些信息要考虑到他们与家庭环境有关的具体关切、价值观和偏好。结论:本研究为指导残听儿童的CI决策过程提供了额外的证据。需要与听力学和决策专家进行额外的合作研究,特别是促进共同决策,为这些家庭提供更好的决策指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
期刊最新文献
Audiological profile in children with congenital inner ear anomalies. The effect of current amplitude and multi-electrode stimulation on eSRT for auditory fitting in cochlear implants with pulse-width loudness coding. The relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels revisited. Translation and validation of the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life (HEAR-QL) questionnaire for preschool children in Dutch. Cochlear reimplantation rate, causes, and outcomes: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1