Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist?

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1007/s41542-023-00156-w
Tammy D Allen, Michelle Hughes Miller, Kimberly A French, Eunsook Kim, Grisselle Centeno
{"title":"Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist?","authors":"Tammy D Allen,&nbsp;Michelle Hughes Miller,&nbsp;Kimberly A French,&nbsp;Eunsook Kim,&nbsp;Grisselle Centeno","doi":"10.1007/s41542-023-00156-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Faculty members are continually confronted with a multitude of activities among which they must divide their time. Prior research suggests that while men and women academics spend the same number of weekly hours working, women tend to expend more time on teaching and service relative to men while men expend more time on research relative to women. Based on cross-sectional survey data from a sample of 783 tenured or tenure-track faculty members from multiple universities, we examine gender differences in time spent in research, teaching, and university service. Regression analyses show that gender differences in time allocation continue to persist after controlling for work and family factors. More specifically, women report more time on teaching and university service than do men, while men report more time spent on research than do women. Results provide evidence that gendered differences in faculty time allocation are robust across time. Potential implications for policy are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00156-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Faculty members are continually confronted with a multitude of activities among which they must divide their time. Prior research suggests that while men and women academics spend the same number of weekly hours working, women tend to expend more time on teaching and service relative to men while men expend more time on research relative to women. Based on cross-sectional survey data from a sample of 783 tenured or tenure-track faculty members from multiple universities, we examine gender differences in time spent in research, teaching, and university service. Regression analyses show that gender differences in time allocation continue to persist after controlling for work and family factors. More specifically, women report more time on teaching and university service than do men, while men report more time spent on research than do women. Results provide evidence that gendered differences in faculty time allocation are robust across time. Potential implications for policy are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究、教学和服务的教师时间支出:性别差异持续存在吗?
教员们不断面临着大量的活动,他们必须在这些活动中分配时间。先前的研究表明,虽然男性和女性学者每周工作时间相同,但相对于男性,女性往往在教学和服务上花费更多的时间,而相对于女性,男性在研究上花费更多时间。基于来自多所大学的783名终身制或终身制教师的横断面调查数据,我们考察了在研究、教学和大学服务方面的时间差异。回归分析表明,在控制了工作和家庭因素后,时间分配方面的性别差异继续存在。更具体地说,女性在教学和大学服务方面的时间比男性多,而男性在研究方面的时间则比女性多。研究结果表明,教师时间分配的性别差异在不同时间段内是显著的。讨论了对政策的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Workplace Substance Use Programs, Policies, and Practices on Current Substance Use Among A National Sample of Low-Income Workers: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Education Level An Evaluation of Indoor Sex Workers’ Psychosocial Occupational Health and Safety in Metro Vancouver, Canada Office Openess Affects Stress Regulation and Teamwork: A Neurophysiological Field Study Identifying Different Patterns of Citizenship Motives: A Latent Profile Analysis Methodological and Demographic Variation in Estimates of Economic Dependence Across Two Types of Gig Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1