Effect of Long-Term Oxygen Therapy on Reducing Rehospitalization of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pulmonary Therapy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s41030-023-00221-3
Ramin Sami, Mahsa Akafzadeh Savari, Marjan Mansourian, Roghayeh Ghazavi, Rokhsareh Meamar
{"title":"Effect of Long-Term Oxygen Therapy on Reducing Rehospitalization of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ramin Sami,&nbsp;Mahsa Akafzadeh Savari,&nbsp;Marjan Mansourian,&nbsp;Roghayeh Ghazavi,&nbsp;Rokhsareh Meamar","doi":"10.1007/s41030-023-00221-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this work is to evaluate whether the addition of home oxygen therapy (HOT) would reduce readmission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, ScopeMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched. The search strategy used the following keywords \"chronic obstructive pulmonary disease\", the intervention \"long-term oxygen therapy\", and the outcome \"readmission\" combined with the AND operator. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Jadad Scale were used for assessing the quality of cohort studies and clinical trials, respectively. A random-effects model was employed in this study after calculating the standard errors by 95% confidence intervals. The I2 statistic and Cochran's Q-test were used to measure heterogeneity. To address heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were carried out according to the length of LTOT, which was classified as \"over 8 months\" and \"under 8 months\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the analysis. In the pooled analysis, the RR [CI95%, p value], heterogeneity criteria for readmission reduced by 1.542 [1.284-1.851, < 0.001], I<sup>2</sup> = 60%, and 1.693 [1.645-1.744, < 0.001], I<sup>2</sup> = 60% for patients with a length of LTOT treatment under and above 8 months, respectively. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically omitting each study, and it showed no influential studies. Egger's test indicated no publication bias (p = 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our results in this systematic review, long-tern oxygen therapy (LTOT) at home was associated with a significantly lower risk ratio of hospital readmission. However, the sample sizes in the studies necessitate larger RCTs to evaluate the effect of LTOT on readmission in COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/ac/41030_2023_Article_221.PMC10203089.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-023-00221-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this work is to evaluate whether the addition of home oxygen therapy (HOT) would reduce readmission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Methods: PubMed, ScopeMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched. The search strategy used the following keywords "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", the intervention "long-term oxygen therapy", and the outcome "readmission" combined with the AND operator. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Jadad Scale were used for assessing the quality of cohort studies and clinical trials, respectively. A random-effects model was employed in this study after calculating the standard errors by 95% confidence intervals. The I2 statistic and Cochran's Q-test were used to measure heterogeneity. To address heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were carried out according to the length of LTOT, which was classified as "over 8 months" and "under 8 months".

Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis. In the pooled analysis, the RR [CI95%, p value], heterogeneity criteria for readmission reduced by 1.542 [1.284-1.851, < 0.001], I2 = 60%, and 1.693 [1.645-1.744, < 0.001], I2 = 60% for patients with a length of LTOT treatment under and above 8 months, respectively. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically omitting each study, and it showed no influential studies. Egger's test indicated no publication bias (p = 0.64).

Conclusions: Based on our results in this systematic review, long-tern oxygen therapy (LTOT) at home was associated with a significantly lower risk ratio of hospital readmission. However, the sample sizes in the studies necessitate larger RCTs to evaluate the effect of LTOT on readmission in COPD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期氧疗对减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再住院的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
本研究的目的是评估家庭氧疗(HOT)的加入是否会减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的再入院率。方法:检索PubMed、ScopeMed、Cochrane、Scopus、Google Scholar等数据库。搜索策略使用以下关键词“慢性阻塞性肺疾病”,干预“长期氧疗”,结局“再入院”结合and操作。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和Jadad量表分别用于评估队列研究和临床试验的质量。本研究采用随机效应模型,以95%置信区间计算标准误差。采用I2统计量和Cochran’s q检验来衡量异质性。为了解决异质性,根据LTOT的长度进行亚组分析,分为“8个月以上”和“8个月以下”。结果:7项研究被纳入分析。在合并分析中,LTOT治疗时间小于8个月和大于8个月的患者再入院的RR [CI95%, p值]和异质性标准分别降低1.542[1.284-1.851,2 = 60%]和1.693[1.645-1.744,2 = 60%]。通过系统地剔除每项研究进行敏感性分析,没有发现有影响的研究。Egger检验显示无发表偏倚(p = 0.64)。结论:基于本系统综述的结果,家庭长期氧疗(LTOT)与医院再入院风险比显著降低相关。然而,这些研究的样本量需要更大的随机对照试验来评估LTOT对COPD患者再入院的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Therapy
Pulmonary Therapy Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Pulmonary Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from pre-clinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of pulmonary therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to: asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; pulmonary hypertension; cystic fibrosis; lung cancer; respiratory tract disorders; allergic rhinitis and other respiratory allergies; influenza, pneumococcal infection, respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory infections; and inhalers and other device therapies. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Pulmonary Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of pulmonary therapies. Open Access All articles published by Pulmonary Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Pulmonary Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €4500/ $5100/ £3650. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Pulmonary Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.
期刊最新文献
Is 'Cardiopulmonary' the New 'Cardiometabolic'? Making a Case for Systems Change in COPD. Exploring Clinical Remission in Moderate Asthma - Perspectives from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. A PrOsPective Cohort Study on Interstitial Lung Disease-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension with a ParticulaR Focus on the Subset with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Features (POPLAR Study). Short-Term Neurologic Complications in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Review on Pathophysiology, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. Qualitative Interviews Exploring Adverse Event Mitigation Strategies in Adults Receiving Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1