Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00340-z
Karan Thakkar, Moe H Kyaw, Iustina Chirila, Carlos Fernando Mendoza, Josie Dodd, Ben Yarnoff
Introduction: This study estimated the potential public health impact of alternative COVID-19 vaccination strategies in Singapore.
Methods: The outcomes of alternative vaccination strategies using a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine updated to the latest circulating strain were estimated using a combined decision tree-Markov cohort model. The model was previously used to estimate the impact of vaccination based on epidemiological data from 2021/22 and vaccine coverage data from 2022/23. It has now been updated with epidemiology data from 2023/24 and an assumed vaccine coverage of 20%. Age-specific inputs were derived from local epidemiological data and published sources. The model projected health outcomes (cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) and economic outcomes (direct medical costs and productivity losses) across different age and risk subgroups.
Results: Vaccinating individuals aged 60 and above, as well as individuals aged 6 months to 59 years with comorbidities, making them at high risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes, with a vaccine coverage of 20%, is projected to result in 14,099 fewer infections, 2668 fewer hospitalizations, and 21 fewer deaths in 1 year. This leads to a total estimated savings of SGD 21.3 million in direct medical costs and SGD 24.8 million in indirect costs. Increasing coverage to 50% has the potential to further increase deaths, hospitalizations, infections, and costs averted by 150%.
Conclusions: Although vaccination has a smaller impact on public health compared to the previous evaluation because of the updated epidemiology and lower estimated coverage, an updated vaccine can still have a public health and economic impact in Singapore.
{"title":"Modeling the Potential Public Health Impact of Updated COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies in Singapore: Epidemiological Data Update.","authors":"Karan Thakkar, Moe H Kyaw, Iustina Chirila, Carlos Fernando Mendoza, Josie Dodd, Ben Yarnoff","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00340-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00340-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study estimated the potential public health impact of alternative COVID-19 vaccination strategies in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The outcomes of alternative vaccination strategies using a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine updated to the latest circulating strain were estimated using a combined decision tree-Markov cohort model. The model was previously used to estimate the impact of vaccination based on epidemiological data from 2021/22 and vaccine coverage data from 2022/23. It has now been updated with epidemiology data from 2023/24 and an assumed vaccine coverage of 20%. Age-specific inputs were derived from local epidemiological data and published sources. The model projected health outcomes (cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) and economic outcomes (direct medical costs and productivity losses) across different age and risk subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccinating individuals aged 60 and above, as well as individuals aged 6 months to 59 years with comorbidities, making them at high risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes, with a vaccine coverage of 20%, is projected to result in 14,099 fewer infections, 2668 fewer hospitalizations, and 21 fewer deaths in 1 year. This leads to a total estimated savings of SGD 21.3 million in direct medical costs and SGD 24.8 million in indirect costs. Increasing coverage to 50% has the potential to further increase deaths, hospitalizations, infections, and costs averted by 150%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although vaccination has a smaller impact on public health compared to the previous evaluation because of the updated epidemiology and lower estimated coverage, an updated vaccine can still have a public health and economic impact in Singapore.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) has emerged as a clinically significant complication associated with a broadening spectrum of therapeutic agents. DI-ILD can result in significant morbidity and mortality if not promptly diagnosed and treated. In this review, we synthesize current evidence concerning the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies of DI-ILD, with focused emphasis on three major therapeutic groups: immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, and biological agents; adding other commonly used drugs known for causing DI-ILD as well, such as: amiodarone, methotrexate, and nitrofurantoin. Early recognition, drug discontinuation, tailored immunosuppression, and supportive care are pivotal to improving outcomes. Enhanced medical awareness and a multidisciplinary care approach are essential to mitigate morbidity and mortality. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review aims to enhance awareness and understanding of DI-ILD, thereby facilitating earlier diagnosis and more effective management strategies for this potentially severe adverse drug event.
{"title":"Drug-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity in the Era of Immunotherapy and Biologics: A Narrative Review of Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Management.","authors":"Josmar J Ríos Poveda, Manuela Herrera Tamayo, Juan J Zapata Huizi, Jacobo Sellares, Fernanda Hernández-González","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00338-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00338-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) has emerged as a clinically significant complication associated with a broadening spectrum of therapeutic agents. DI-ILD can result in significant morbidity and mortality if not promptly diagnosed and treated. In this review, we synthesize current evidence concerning the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies of DI-ILD, with focused emphasis on three major therapeutic groups: immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, and biological agents; adding other commonly used drugs known for causing DI-ILD as well, such as: amiodarone, methotrexate, and nitrofurantoin. Early recognition, drug discontinuation, tailored immunosuppression, and supportive care are pivotal to improving outcomes. Enhanced medical awareness and a multidisciplinary care approach are essential to mitigate morbidity and mortality. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review aims to enhance awareness and understanding of DI-ILD, thereby facilitating earlier diagnosis and more effective management strategies for this potentially severe adverse drug event.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00339-6
Kai Xian Thng, Micheál Mac Aogáin, Sanjay H Chotirmall
Emerging evidence demonstrates the evolving role of fungi in the pathophysiology and disease progression observed in bronchiectasis. Fungal-associated traits are linked to disease severity, exacerbation frequency and airway inflammation. Structural abnormalities and impaired mucociliary clearance, characteristic of bronchiectasis, predispose to fungal colonisation, with subsequent immunopathogenic responses dependent on underlying host immunity. The diagnosis of fungal infection remains challenging in clinical settings, owing to the limitations of existing diagnostic modalities; however, the development of culture-independent molecular techniques shows promise. The use of next-generation sequencing has significantly advanced our understanding of the fungal microbiome in bronchiectasis, identifying fungi that are challenging to culture. Integrative microbiomics further elucidates the intricate and dynamic role of fungi in relation to other microbial kingdoms, and across distant organs such as the gut, revealing important relationships with bacterial pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Airway inflammatory profiling has shown fungal-associated inflammatory endotypes which may serve as treatable traits. Environmental influences on fungi and bronchiectasis-exacerbated by air pollution and climate change-underscore the key role of the exposome in fungal-associated endotypes in bronchiectasis. This review outlines the clinical significance of fungi in bronchiectasis, the current diagnostic and treatment challenges, and emerging fungal-associated endotypes in the context of environmental influence on disease.
{"title":"Fungal-Associated Endotypes as a Treatable Trait in Bronchiectasis.","authors":"Kai Xian Thng, Micheál Mac Aogáin, Sanjay H Chotirmall","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00339-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00339-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emerging evidence demonstrates the evolving role of fungi in the pathophysiology and disease progression observed in bronchiectasis. Fungal-associated traits are linked to disease severity, exacerbation frequency and airway inflammation. Structural abnormalities and impaired mucociliary clearance, characteristic of bronchiectasis, predispose to fungal colonisation, with subsequent immunopathogenic responses dependent on underlying host immunity. The diagnosis of fungal infection remains challenging in clinical settings, owing to the limitations of existing diagnostic modalities; however, the development of culture-independent molecular techniques shows promise. The use of next-generation sequencing has significantly advanced our understanding of the fungal microbiome in bronchiectasis, identifying fungi that are challenging to culture. Integrative microbiomics further elucidates the intricate and dynamic role of fungi in relation to other microbial kingdoms, and across distant organs such as the gut, revealing important relationships with bacterial pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Airway inflammatory profiling has shown fungal-associated inflammatory endotypes which may serve as treatable traits. Environmental influences on fungi and bronchiectasis-exacerbated by air pollution and climate change-underscore the key role of the exposome in fungal-associated endotypes in bronchiectasis. This review outlines the clinical significance of fungi in bronchiectasis, the current diagnostic and treatment challenges, and emerging fungal-associated endotypes in the context of environmental influence on disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145857475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00337-8
Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Alison Witkin, Carly J Paoli, Mark Small, Mia Harvey, Daniel Graham, Sumeet Panjabi, Gabriela Gomez Rendon, Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez
Introduction: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare, progressive pulmonary hypertension characterized by chronic fibrotic thrombi. Treatment includes surgical, endovascular, and pharmaceutical options. With varied treatments, it is essential to understand how they are deployed across real-world settings. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and quality of life across real-world settings in the USA.
Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World CTEPH Disease Specific Program™, a cross-sectional survey of US physicians and patients, conducted September 2023-May 2024. Physicians recruited by local fieldwork agents using a short screening questionnaire provided demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns for 1-6 consecutively consulting patients with right heart catheterization confirmed CTEPH. These patients self-completed a form containing the EQ-5D-5L, visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), workplace and activity impairment scale (WPAI), pulmonary arterial hypertension symptom and impact scale. Data were stratified by treatment setting (accredited or nonaccredited pulmonary hypertension center). Analyses were descriptive.
Results: In total, 98 physicians provided data on 153 patients, of whom 53 completed the patient self-complete form. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 59.2 years, 59.5% female, and 73.2% considered operable. Of those who had undergone a surgery/procedure (n = 68), 82.1% had undergone pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE), and 19.1% balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Overall, 82.4% were prescribed any pharmaceutical medication for their CTEPH; of those treated, 81.0% were prescribed anticoagulants. Monotherapy (45.7%) was the most reported regimen in nonaccredited settings; for accredited settings, this was dual therapy (45.5%). EQ-5D-5L scores were low with nearly a quarter of patients reporting problems with usual activities and mobility, and 26.4% needing to change work patterns.
Conclusions: Though treatment patterns generally followed guidelines, BPA was potentially underutilized. Dyspnea was common, despite treatment, with patients experiencing reduced quality of life, highlighting an unmet need.
慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)是一种罕见的以慢性纤维化血栓为特征的进行性肺动脉高压。治疗包括手术、血管内治疗和药物治疗。对于各种各样的治疗方法,了解它们如何在现实环境中部署是至关重要的。我们的目的是描述临床特征、治疗模式和生活质量在美国真实世界的设置。方法:数据来自Adelphi Real World CTEPH疾病特异性项目™,这是一项针对美国医生和患者的横断面调查,于2023年9月至2024年5月进行。由当地实地调查机构招募的医生使用简短的筛选问卷,为1-6名连续咨询的右心导管确诊CTEPH患者提供人口统计学、临床特征和治疗模式。这些患者自行填写了一份表格,包括EQ-5D-5L、视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)、工作场所和活动障碍量表(WPAI)、肺动脉高压症状和影响量表。数据按治疗环境(认可或非认可的肺动脉高压中心)分层。分析是描述性的。结果:共有98名医生提供了153名患者的资料,其中53名填写了患者自填表格。患者平均(标准差)年龄为59.2岁,女性59.5%,73.2%认为可手术。在接受手术/程序的患者中(n = 68), 82.1%接受了肺血栓动脉内膜切除术(PTE), 19.1%接受了球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)。总体而言,82.4%的患者因CTEPH接受了药物治疗;在接受治疗的患者中,81.0%的患者使用抗凝剂。单药治疗(45.7%)是在非认证环境中报告最多的方案;对于认可的机构,这是双重治疗(45.5%)。EQ-5D-5L评分较低,近四分之一的患者报告在日常活动和流动性方面存在问题,26.4%的患者需要改变工作模式。结论:虽然治疗模式一般遵循指南,但BPA可能未得到充分利用。呼吸困难是常见的,尽管治疗,患者的生活质量下降,突出未满足的需求。
{"title":"Real-World Treatment Patterns and Burden of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Patients across Consultation Settings in the USA.","authors":"Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Alison Witkin, Carly J Paoli, Mark Small, Mia Harvey, Daniel Graham, Sumeet Panjabi, Gabriela Gomez Rendon, Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00337-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00337-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare, progressive pulmonary hypertension characterized by chronic fibrotic thrombi. Treatment includes surgical, endovascular, and pharmaceutical options. With varied treatments, it is essential to understand how they are deployed across real-world settings. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and quality of life across real-world settings in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World CTEPH Disease Specific Program™, a cross-sectional survey of US physicians and patients, conducted September 2023-May 2024. Physicians recruited by local fieldwork agents using a short screening questionnaire provided demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns for 1-6 consecutively consulting patients with right heart catheterization confirmed CTEPH. These patients self-completed a form containing the EQ-5D-5L, visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), workplace and activity impairment scale (WPAI), pulmonary arterial hypertension symptom and impact scale. Data were stratified by treatment setting (accredited or nonaccredited pulmonary hypertension center). Analyses were descriptive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 98 physicians provided data on 153 patients, of whom 53 completed the patient self-complete form. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 59.2 years, 59.5% female, and 73.2% considered operable. Of those who had undergone a surgery/procedure (n = 68), 82.1% had undergone pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE), and 19.1% balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Overall, 82.4% were prescribed any pharmaceutical medication for their CTEPH; of those treated, 81.0% were prescribed anticoagulants. Monotherapy (45.7%) was the most reported regimen in nonaccredited settings; for accredited settings, this was dual therapy (45.5%). EQ-5D-5L scores were low with nearly a quarter of patients reporting problems with usual activities and mobility, and 26.4% needing to change work patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though treatment patterns generally followed guidelines, BPA was potentially underutilized. Dyspnea was common, despite treatment, with patients experiencing reduced quality of life, highlighting an unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00336-9
Kai M Beeh, Tim Harrison, Enrico Heffler, Hartmut Timmermann, Stephan Weber, Sandra Wegner
Introduction: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is an important type 2 (T2) asthma biomarker. Home-based FeNO monitoring can provide longitudinal data better reflecting the variable nature of T2 inflammation versus single-point data. We sought to compare longitudinal mean FeNO and variability (CV) in relation to asthma control, and to compare detection rate of T2FeNO inflammation at diagnostic (≥ 40 ppb in GINA 1) and on-treatment (≥ 25 ppb in GINA 2-5) cutoffs during home versus clinic measurements.
Methods: This was an observational study with once-daily home-based FeNO (Vivatmo me) and symptom diary in patients with asthma of different GINA steps performed over 3 months. Clinic FeNO, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were also collected at two visits (enrolment/study end).
Results: We enrolled 85 patients (n = 23 step 1, n = 37 steps 2-3, and n = 25 steps 4-5). Mean FeNO over 3 months was highest in uncontrolled steps 4-5 (p = 0.006), and FeNO variability in steps 2-3 (p = 0.046). Subjects with optimal control (ACQ < 0.75 both visits) had comparable mean FeNO values, but fewer patients with CV above the median vs. suboptimally controlled patients (39.1% vs. 54.1%; p = 0.03). In GINA 1, FeNO CV was lower in optimally controlled patients (p = 0.10). Mean FeNO was higher on symptomatic asthma days, particularly in step 1 (p = 0.002), with similar trends during loss of asthma control phases. Home FeNO increased the detection rate of T2FeNO inflammation at a diagnostic cutoff (≥ 40 ppb, step 1) from 8.7% (clinic FeNO) to 47.8% of subjects, and of on-treatment T2FeNO inflammation in GINA steps 2-3 and 4-5 from 58.3% to 83.3%, and 64% to 96%, respectively.
Conclusion: Home-based FeNO provides important information about airway inflammation, distinct and complementary to symptom control. Detection of T2FeNO inflammation is facilitated at all GINA steps at diagnostic and predictive/prognostic cutoffs, with important implications for management and diagnosis.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) DRKS00029118, registered July 1, 2022.
{"title":"Home-Based FeNO Monitoring with the Vivatmo me Device Reveals Type 2 Inflammatory Patterns of Patients with Asthma at Different Treatment Steps: The FeNO@Home Study.","authors":"Kai M Beeh, Tim Harrison, Enrico Heffler, Hartmut Timmermann, Stephan Weber, Sandra Wegner","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00336-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00336-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is an important type 2 (T2) asthma biomarker. Home-based FeNO monitoring can provide longitudinal data better reflecting the variable nature of T2 inflammation versus single-point data. We sought to compare longitudinal mean FeNO and variability (CV) in relation to asthma control, and to compare detection rate of T2<sub>FeNO</sub> inflammation at diagnostic (≥ 40 ppb in GINA 1) and on-treatment (≥ 25 ppb in GINA 2-5) cutoffs during home versus clinic measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study with once-daily home-based FeNO (Vivatmo me) and symptom diary in patients with asthma of different GINA steps performed over 3 months. Clinic FeNO, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were also collected at two visits (enrolment/study end).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 85 patients (n = 23 step 1, n = 37 steps 2-3, and n = 25 steps 4-5). Mean FeNO over 3 months was highest in uncontrolled steps 4-5 (p = 0.006), and FeNO variability in steps 2-3 (p = 0.046). Subjects with optimal control (ACQ < 0.75 both visits) had comparable mean FeNO values, but fewer patients with CV above the median vs. suboptimally controlled patients (39.1% vs. 54.1%; p = 0.03). In GINA 1, FeNO CV was lower in optimally controlled patients (p = 0.10). Mean FeNO was higher on symptomatic asthma days, particularly in step 1 (p = 0.002), with similar trends during loss of asthma control phases. Home FeNO increased the detection rate of T2<sub>FeNO</sub> inflammation at a diagnostic cutoff (≥ 40 ppb, step 1) from 8.7% (clinic FeNO) to 47.8% of subjects, and of on-treatment T2<sub>FeNO</sub> inflammation in GINA steps 2-3 and 4-5 from 58.3% to 83.3%, and 64% to 96%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home-based FeNO provides important information about airway inflammation, distinct and complementary to symptom control. Detection of T2<sub>FeNO</sub> inflammation is facilitated at all GINA steps at diagnostic and predictive/prognostic cutoffs, with important implications for management and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) DRKS00029118, registered July 1, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145725460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00334-x
Marco Cipolli, Teja Thorat, Pia C Pafundi, Alessandro Roggeri, Daniela P Roggeri, Carlotta Rossi, Emily Pintani, Ilaria Meneghelli, Francesca Lucca, Anna Fratoni, Gabriela Vega-Hernandez
Introduction: In Italy, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in combination with ivacaftor was reimbursed starting July 2021 for use in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged ≥ 12 years homozygous for F508del mutation or heterozygous with at least one F508del allele and with a minimal function mutation. This study assessed the impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA on real-world outcomes among this population in Italy.
Methods: This observational study used data from Verona CF Center from October 2018 to December 2022 to describe the impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA on individuals aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 1 F508del allele on lung function and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Lung function (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s [ppFEV1]), hospitalizations, outpatient visits, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), and prescribed medications were analyzed during baseline and follow-up periods (12 months pre- and post-ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation, respectively) and reported as change from baseline.
Results: A total of 149 individuals were included (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 32.6 [12.25] years). A mean improvement in ppFEV1 of +14.38 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.65; 16.10) was observed during the follow-up period. An 87.2% reduction in the annualized PEx rate (rate ratio: 0.128 [95% CI 0.085; 0.187]) and an 85.4% reduction in the annualized hospitalization rate (rate ratio: 0.146 [95% CI 0.096; 0.213]) were observed during follow-up compared to baseline. Reductions in the proportion of individuals requiring prescription medications, including intravenous antibiotics, mucolytic agents, and bronchodilators, were observed.
Conclusion: Substantial improvements in lung function and reductions in HCRU were observed after treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA in the Verona CF Center. Results contribute to the growing evidence of country-specific real-world data on the positive impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA.
在意大利,elexaftor /tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)联合ivacaftor从2021年7月开始获得报销,用于年龄≥12岁、F508del突变纯合或至少一个F508del等位基因杂合且功能突变最小的囊性纤维化(CF)患者。本研究评估了ELX/TEZ/IVA对意大利这一人群实际预后的影响。方法:本观察性研究使用维罗纳CF中心2018年10月至2022年12月的数据,描述ELX/TEZ/IVA对≥12岁、F508del等位基因≥1的个体肺功能和医疗资源利用(HCRU)的影响。在基线和随访期间(分别为elx /TEZ/IVA开始前和开始后12个月),分析肺功能(1秒内预测用力呼气量百分比[ppFEV1])、住院、门诊就诊、肺恶化(PEx)和处方药,并报告与基线相比的变化。结果:共纳入149例(平均[标准差,SD]年龄:32.6[12.25]岁)。随访期间,ppFEV1平均改善14.38个百分点(95%可信区间[CI] 12.65; 16.10)。与基线相比,随访期间观察到年化PEx率降低87.2%(率比:0.128 [95% CI 0.085; 0.187]),年化住院率降低85.4%(率比:0.146 [95% CI 0.096; 0.213])。观察到需要处方药物(包括静脉注射抗生素、黏液溶解剂和支气管扩张剂)的个体比例有所下降。结论:在维罗纳CF中心接受ELX/TEZ/IVA治疗后,观察到肺功能的显著改善和HCRU的降低。这些结果为ELX/TEZ/IVA的积极影响提供了越来越多的具体国家实际数据证据。
{"title":"Real-World Impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in Italy: A Retrospective Study from a Cystic Fibrosis Center.","authors":"Marco Cipolli, Teja Thorat, Pia C Pafundi, Alessandro Roggeri, Daniela P Roggeri, Carlotta Rossi, Emily Pintani, Ilaria Meneghelli, Francesca Lucca, Anna Fratoni, Gabriela Vega-Hernandez","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00334-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00334-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Italy, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in combination with ivacaftor was reimbursed starting July 2021 for use in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged ≥ 12 years homozygous for F508del mutation or heterozygous with at least one F508del allele and with a minimal function mutation. This study assessed the impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA on real-world outcomes among this population in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study used data from Verona CF Center from October 2018 to December 2022 to describe the impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA on individuals aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 1 F508del allele on lung function and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Lung function (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s [ppFEV<sub>1</sub>]), hospitalizations, outpatient visits, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), and prescribed medications were analyzed during baseline and follow-up periods (12 months pre- and post-ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation, respectively) and reported as change from baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 individuals were included (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 32.6 [12.25] years). A mean improvement in ppFEV<sub>1</sub> of +14.38 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.65; 16.10) was observed during the follow-up period. An 87.2% reduction in the annualized PEx rate (rate ratio: 0.128 [95% CI 0.085; 0.187]) and an 85.4% reduction in the annualized hospitalization rate (rate ratio: 0.146 [95% CI 0.096; 0.213]) were observed during follow-up compared to baseline. Reductions in the proportion of individuals requiring prescription medications, including intravenous antibiotics, mucolytic agents, and bronchodilators, were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial improvements in lung function and reductions in HCRU were observed after treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA in the Verona CF Center. Results contribute to the growing evidence of country-specific real-world data on the positive impact of ELX/TEZ/IVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00319-w
Christer Janson, Hanna Hisinger-Mölkänen, Lilla Tamasi, Ville Vartiainen, Lauri Lehtimäki
Introduction: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have a 20-40-fold lower carbon footprint compared to pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). Switching from pMDI to DPI is therefore beneficial from an environmental perspective, but many health care professionals are concerned that this may worsen treatment outcomes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods: We analyzed patient outcomes and carbon footprints of switching inhaler treatment from pMDI to DPI. We performed a post hoc analysis on clinical outcomes data from a 12-week real-world, non-interventional study of adult patients with asthma or COPD who switched treatment from pMDI to the budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler DPI. Clinical end points included asthma control test (ACT), Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), lung function tests, and reliever use (asthma), and COPD assessment test (CAT), and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) (COPD). In the carbon footprint calculation, we used estimates from the Montreal Protocol for pMDI and for DPI the estimate as reported.
Results: Among all 237 patients (142 asthma, 95 COPD) by switching their treatment clinical improvements were observed in all the outcome measures (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the need for reliever medication decreased among patients with asthma (p < 0.001). The amount of estimated kg CO2e emissions per year for maintenance treatment was 97.0% lower for the DPI than for pMDI. For reliever medication among patients with asthma, it was 99.6% lower. Among them, the emission savings could amount to approximately 131 kg CO2e annually. This is of similar magnitude, as individual high-impact environmental actions such as eating a plant-based diet or purchasing green energy.
Conclusions: Our results show that disease control was maintained among patients with asthma or COPD when they switched from pMDI to DPI, while the carbon footprint of inhaler treatment was reduced.
{"title":"Switching to the Dry Powder Inhaler: Disease Control with a Lower Carbon Footprint.","authors":"Christer Janson, Hanna Hisinger-Mölkänen, Lilla Tamasi, Ville Vartiainen, Lauri Lehtimäki","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00319-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00319-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have a 20-40-fold lower carbon footprint compared to pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). Switching from pMDI to DPI is therefore beneficial from an environmental perspective, but many health care professionals are concerned that this may worsen treatment outcomes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patient outcomes and carbon footprints of switching inhaler treatment from pMDI to DPI. We performed a post hoc analysis on clinical outcomes data from a 12-week real-world, non-interventional study of adult patients with asthma or COPD who switched treatment from pMDI to the budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler DPI. Clinical end points included asthma control test (ACT), Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), lung function tests, and reliever use (asthma), and COPD assessment test (CAT), and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) (COPD). In the carbon footprint calculation, we used estimates from the Montreal Protocol for pMDI and for DPI the estimate as reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all 237 patients (142 asthma, 95 COPD) by switching their treatment clinical improvements were observed in all the outcome measures (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the need for reliever medication decreased among patients with asthma (p < 0.001). The amount of estimated kg CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions per year for maintenance treatment was 97.0% lower for the DPI than for pMDI. For reliever medication among patients with asthma, it was 99.6% lower. Among them, the emission savings could amount to approximately 131 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e annually. This is of similar magnitude, as individual high-impact environmental actions such as eating a plant-based diet or purchasing green energy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that disease control was maintained among patients with asthma or COPD when they switched from pMDI to DPI, while the carbon footprint of inhaler treatment was reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"753-763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623521/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00311-4
Teresa De Marco, Carly J Paoli, Nicole S Croteau, Fei Tang, Harrison W Farber
Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive disease resulting from elevated pulmonary arterial pressure leading to right ventricular failure and death. Optimal adherence and persistence to medical therapy are necessary to improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize adherence and persistence to first-line PAH therapies in patients newly initiating treatment.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized Komodo Research Database claims data. Adults initiating therapy were identified based on ≥ 1 claim for a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and/or an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2022 (index date), continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment for ≥ 12 months before and including index, ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims for pulmonary hypertension/PAH, and ≥ 1 claim for right heart catheterization. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC); nonadherence was defined as PDC < 80%. Persistence was defined as time from index to treatment discontinuation (gap in therapy > 60 days). Propensity score matching was utilized 1:1:1 across groups.
Results: A total of 9176 patients met the study criteria (6989 PDE5i, 1006 ERA, 1181 dual combination). After matching, each cohort included 714 patients. Median (95% confidence interval) persistence was highest for ERA monotherapy (26.5 [19.0-33.0] months), followed by dual combination therapy (19.8 [16.6-23.4] months) and PDE5i monotherapy (12.9 [10.8-17.4] months)-P = 0.019, dual combination versus ERA; P = 0.026, dual combination versus PDE5i. Nonadherence was highest with dual combination therapy (35.4%), followed by PDE5i monotherapy (17.1%) and ERA monotherapy (11.9%)-P < 0.001, dual combination versus each monotherapy.
Conclusions: Adherence to initial PAH therapy is suboptimal, especially with upfront dual combination therapy. Persistence was highest for ERA monotherapy, followed by dual combination therapy and PDE5i monotherapy. Strategies to improve adherence and persistence are crucial to optimizing outcomes.
{"title":"Real-World Adherence and Persistence of Upfront Therapy in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the United States.","authors":"Teresa De Marco, Carly J Paoli, Nicole S Croteau, Fei Tang, Harrison W Farber","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00311-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00311-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive disease resulting from elevated pulmonary arterial pressure leading to right ventricular failure and death. Optimal adherence and persistence to medical therapy are necessary to improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize adherence and persistence to first-line PAH therapies in patients newly initiating treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized Komodo Research Database claims data. Adults initiating therapy were identified based on ≥ 1 claim for a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and/or an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2022 (index date), continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment for ≥ 12 months before and including index, ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims for pulmonary hypertension/PAH, and ≥ 1 claim for right heart catheterization. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC); nonadherence was defined as PDC < 80%. Persistence was defined as time from index to treatment discontinuation (gap in therapy > 60 days). Propensity score matching was utilized 1:1:1 across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9176 patients met the study criteria (6989 PDE5i, 1006 ERA, 1181 dual combination). After matching, each cohort included 714 patients. Median (95% confidence interval) persistence was highest for ERA monotherapy (26.5 [19.0-33.0] months), followed by dual combination therapy (19.8 [16.6-23.4] months) and PDE5i monotherapy (12.9 [10.8-17.4] months)-P = 0.019, dual combination versus ERA; P = 0.026, dual combination versus PDE5i. Nonadherence was highest with dual combination therapy (35.4%), followed by PDE5i monotherapy (17.1%) and ERA monotherapy (11.9%)-P < 0.001, dual combination versus each monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to initial PAH therapy is suboptimal, especially with upfront dual combination therapy. Persistence was highest for ERA monotherapy, followed by dual combination therapy and PDE5i monotherapy. Strategies to improve adherence and persistence are crucial to optimizing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"587-604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623596/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00323-0
Guy Brusselle, Jodie Crawford, Peter G Gibson, David Leather, Alison Moore, John J Oppenheimer, Ian D Pavord, Marcus Stanaland, Emilio Pizzichini
The "treatable traits" approach to asthma management has helped revolutionize severe asthma treatment with biologic therapy and includes using biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific treatment. The ability to understand which characteristics predict response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or bronchodilator therapy in mild and moderate-to-severe asthma is also vital for physicians to provide treatment tailored to an individual's phenotype/endotype. Here, we identified studies of inhaled treatments in asthma exploring treatment outcomes based upon subgroups of baseline characteristics, including type 2 biomarkers, asthma attack history, baseline lung function, bronchodilator reversibility, patient age and age at asthma onset, body mass index, smoking status, sex, and ethnicity. We assessed the available evidence regarding the influence of each characteristic on lung function, asthma attacks or asthma control in patients with asthma following treatment with either ICS, ICS/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) therapy, or ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy. Of all the characteristics examined, only type 2 biomarkers (blood eosinophil levels and fractional exhaled nitric oxide) appear to consistently predict treatment response, particularly regarding ICS. For all other characteristics, we found either evidence that baseline values are not predictive of response to inhaled treatment or mixed and inconclusive evidence requiring further investigation.
{"title":"Misconceptions of Traits to Predict Response to Inhaled Corticosteroid and Bronchodilator Therapies in Asthma: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Guy Brusselle, Jodie Crawford, Peter G Gibson, David Leather, Alison Moore, John J Oppenheimer, Ian D Pavord, Marcus Stanaland, Emilio Pizzichini","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00323-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00323-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"treatable traits\" approach to asthma management has helped revolutionize severe asthma treatment with biologic therapy and includes using biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific treatment. The ability to understand which characteristics predict response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or bronchodilator therapy in mild and moderate-to-severe asthma is also vital for physicians to provide treatment tailored to an individual's phenotype/endotype. Here, we identified studies of inhaled treatments in asthma exploring treatment outcomes based upon subgroups of baseline characteristics, including type 2 biomarkers, asthma attack history, baseline lung function, bronchodilator reversibility, patient age and age at asthma onset, body mass index, smoking status, sex, and ethnicity. We assessed the available evidence regarding the influence of each characteristic on lung function, asthma attacks or asthma control in patients with asthma following treatment with either ICS, ICS/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (LABA) therapy, or ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy. Of all the characteristics examined, only type 2 biomarkers (blood eosinophil levels and fractional exhaled nitric oxide) appear to consistently predict treatment response, particularly regarding ICS. For all other characteristics, we found either evidence that baseline values are not predictive of response to inhaled treatment or mixed and inconclusive evidence requiring further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00312-3
Moritz Fleischhauer, Kai Berkenfeld, David Stadermann, Sitaram Velaga, Igor Gonda, Peter Langguth, Herbert Wachtel
Introduction: The modification of an inhaler's air flow resistance influences a patient's inhalation flow profile, thereby affecting the exit velocity of an aerosol leaving the Respimat® mouthpiece. A slower inhalation maneuver results in reduced plume velocity and thus a decreased oropharyngeal deposition due to reduced impaction. This could not only lead to fewer unwanted side effects associated with inhaled therapies, but also enhance lung deposition.
Methods: Device prototypes with different air flow resistances were designed using custom-made inserts that can be clipped into the Respimat mouthpiece. The consequences on aerosol characteristics, as well as on in vitro deposition, were analyzed. Computational fluid dynamics simulations contributed to a better understanding of the modified aerodynamic conditions.
Results: Different insert geometries resulted in modified device resistances. However, an increased flow resistance does not necessarily result in an improved in vitro performance. The flow restrictors critically determine aerosol characteristics such as plume velocity and spray pattern, thereby altering in vitro deposition patterns. Quantitative data on mouth-throat deposition and aerosol characteristics are reported.
Conclusions: Integrating flow restrictors into the Respimat mouthpiece offers a promising approach to enhance patient centricity by promoting slower inhalation, thereby reducing the likelihood of suboptimal use. The use of a porous insert acting as a diffuser demonstrated minimal impact on internal airflow dynamics and in vitro deposition, suggesting that such designs can support correct inhalation technique without compromising aerosol performance. By minimizing the influence of patient-dependent factors, this strategy may help standardize the inhalation process and improve therapeutic outcomes. Video Abstract available for this article. Video Abstract (MP4 85313 KB).
{"title":"Impact of Flow Restrictors on Aerosol Delivery of the Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler.","authors":"Moritz Fleischhauer, Kai Berkenfeld, David Stadermann, Sitaram Velaga, Igor Gonda, Peter Langguth, Herbert Wachtel","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00312-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00312-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The modification of an inhaler's air flow resistance influences a patient's inhalation flow profile, thereby affecting the exit velocity of an aerosol leaving the Respimat® mouthpiece. A slower inhalation maneuver results in reduced plume velocity and thus a decreased oropharyngeal deposition due to reduced impaction. This could not only lead to fewer unwanted side effects associated with inhaled therapies, but also enhance lung deposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Device prototypes with different air flow resistances were designed using custom-made inserts that can be clipped into the Respimat mouthpiece. The consequences on aerosol characteristics, as well as on in vitro deposition, were analyzed. Computational fluid dynamics simulations contributed to a better understanding of the modified aerodynamic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different insert geometries resulted in modified device resistances. However, an increased flow resistance does not necessarily result in an improved in vitro performance. The flow restrictors critically determine aerosol characteristics such as plume velocity and spray pattern, thereby altering in vitro deposition patterns. Quantitative data on mouth-throat deposition and aerosol characteristics are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating flow restrictors into the Respimat mouthpiece offers a promising approach to enhance patient centricity by promoting slower inhalation, thereby reducing the likelihood of suboptimal use. The use of a porous insert acting as a diffuser demonstrated minimal impact on internal airflow dynamics and in vitro deposition, suggesting that such designs can support correct inhalation technique without compromising aerosol performance. By minimizing the influence of patient-dependent factors, this strategy may help standardize the inhalation process and improve therapeutic outcomes. Video Abstract available for this article. Video Abstract (MP4 85313 KB).</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"605-623"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623585/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145034065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}