The safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Cirugia Y Cirujanos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24875/CIRU.21000774
Tiantian Zhao, Yang Liu, Feng Li, Yang Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Bin Zhang, Junmao Gao
{"title":"The safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.","authors":"Tiantian Zhao,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Feng Li,&nbsp;Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Bin Zhang,&nbsp;Junmao Gao","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.21000774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and fenestration discectomy (FD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The complete clinical data from 87 patients with LDH from our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a control group (n = 39, treated with FD) and a research group (n = 48, treated with PTED) according to the prescribed treatments. The basic operation conditions were compared across the two groups. Surgical outcomes were assessed. The incidences of complications and the life quality of patients were evaluated 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients in both groups completed the operation. The visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index score of patients in the research group was significantly lower while the Orthopaedic Association Score was significantly higher after surgery. The success rate of the operation in the research group which was significantly higher and the rate of complications was significantly lower. No statistical differences in the quality of life were observed between the patients (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PTED and FD are effective in the treatment of LDH. However, our study showed that PTED has a higher rate of treatment success, faster recovery times and is safer than FD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":"91 2","pages":"153-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to explore the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and fenestration discectomy (FD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Material and methods: The complete clinical data from 87 patients with LDH from our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a control group (n = 39, treated with FD) and a research group (n = 48, treated with PTED) according to the prescribed treatments. The basic operation conditions were compared across the two groups. Surgical outcomes were assessed. The incidences of complications and the life quality of patients were evaluated 1 year after surgery.

Results: The patients in both groups completed the operation. The visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index score of patients in the research group was significantly lower while the Orthopaedic Association Score was significantly higher after surgery. The success rate of the operation in the research group which was significantly higher and the rate of complications was significantly lower. No statistical differences in the quality of life were observed between the patients (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: PTED and FD are effective in the treatment of LDH. However, our study showed that PTED has a higher rate of treatment success, faster recovery times and is safer than FD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮经椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术和开窗椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性和有效性。
背景:本研究的目的是探讨经皮经椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术(PTED)和开窗椎间盘切除术(FD)治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院87例LDH患者的完整临床资料。按照规定的治疗方法将患者分为对照组(n = 39,采用FD治疗)和研究组(n = 48,采用PTED治疗)。比较两组患者的基本手术条件。评估手术结果。术后1年观察并发症发生率及患者生活质量。结果:两组患者均完成手术。研究组患者术后视觉模拟量表和Oswestry残疾指数评分显著低于对照组,骨科协会评分显著高于对照组。研究组手术成功率明显高于对照组,并发症发生率明显低于对照组。两组患者生活质量比较差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:PTED联合FD治疗LDH疗效显著。然而,我们的研究表明,PTED比FD具有更高的治疗成功率,更快的恢复时间和更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and radiological assessment of vascular anatomy in patients who underwent D3 left hemicolectomy. A model to determine factors influencing intraoperative complications in sleeve gastrectomy. [Extremity soft tissue sarcoma: does surgical margin impact survival?] Relación preoperatoria de neutrófilos a proteína C reactiva como predictor de complicaciones posoperatorias del cáncer de pancreas ¿La vía de señalización de sonic hedgehog desempeña un papel en el mecanismo antirreflujo de la vejiga en los niños?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1