Occupational value outcomes among people with mental health issues participating in activity-based interventions - The importance of internal and external factors.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2023.2184718
Mona Eklund
{"title":"Occupational value outcomes among people with mental health issues participating in activity-based interventions - The importance of internal and external factors.","authors":"Mona Eklund","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2023.2184718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perceived occupational value is an important treatment outcome but is still relatively unexplored as a phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether the Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) intervention for people with mental health issues was effective compared to Standard Occupational Therapy (SOT) regarding improvement on three dimensions of occupational value (concrete, socio-symbolic and self-reward), and how internal factors (self-esteem and self-mastery) and external factors (sociodemographics) were related to occupational value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a cluster RCT (<i>n</i> = 226) and used self-report questionnaires on three occasions (baseline = T1, completed intervention = T2, six-month follow-up = T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences between the groups were seen in occupational value change scores. Within-group analyses (T1-T3) indicated a change in the BEL group on concrete value and self-reward value. No change was indicated in the SOT group. Associations showed that self-esteem and self-mastery were correlated with all three aspects of occupational value. Having children was negative for experiencing occupational value, whereas having a friend was positive. None of the correlates could predict changes in occupational value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-related factors appeared to be integral in occupational value.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Since occupational value is essential for a meaningful life, therapists should consider such factors and peer support when supporting people with mental health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2184718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perceived occupational value is an important treatment outcome but is still relatively unexplored as a phenomenon.

Aim: To evaluate whether the Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) intervention for people with mental health issues was effective compared to Standard Occupational Therapy (SOT) regarding improvement on three dimensions of occupational value (concrete, socio-symbolic and self-reward), and how internal factors (self-esteem and self-mastery) and external factors (sociodemographics) were related to occupational value.

Methods: The study was a cluster RCT (n = 226) and used self-report questionnaires on three occasions (baseline = T1, completed intervention = T2, six-month follow-up = T3).

Results: No differences between the groups were seen in occupational value change scores. Within-group analyses (T1-T3) indicated a change in the BEL group on concrete value and self-reward value. No change was indicated in the SOT group. Associations showed that self-esteem and self-mastery were correlated with all three aspects of occupational value. Having children was negative for experiencing occupational value, whereas having a friend was positive. None of the correlates could predict changes in occupational value.

Conclusion: Self-related factors appeared to be integral in occupational value.

Significance: Since occupational value is essential for a meaningful life, therapists should consider such factors and peer support when supporting people with mental health issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与以活动为基础的干预措施的心理健康问题人群的职业价值结果——内部和外部因素的重要性
背景:感知职业价值是一种重要的治疗结果,但作为一种现象仍然相对未被探索。目的:评价平衡日常生活(BEL)干预与标准职业治疗(SOT)相比,在职业价值(具体、社会象征和自我奖励)三个维度上的改善是否有效,以及内部因素(自尊和自我掌握)和外部因素(社会人口统计学)与职业价值的关系。方法:采用聚类随机对照试验(n = 226),采用3次自我报告问卷(基线= T1,完成干预= T2, 6个月随访= T3)。结果:两组间职业价值观改变得分无显著差异。组内分析(T1-T3)显示BEL组在具体价值和自我奖励价值上有变化。SOT组无明显变化。关联表明,自尊和自我控制与职业价值的三个方面均相关。有孩子对体验职业价值有负面影响,而有朋友对体验职业价值有积极影响。所有相关因素都不能预测职业价值的变化。结论:自我相关因素是影响职业价值的重要因素。意义:由于职业价值对于有意义的生活是必不可少的,治疗师在支持有心理健康问题的人时应该考虑这些因素和同伴的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Cognitive interviews on the Swedish occupational balance questionnaire. Occupational therapy in the space of artificial intelligence: Ethical considerations and human-centered efforts. Evaluation of a driving clinical decision pathway for generalist occupational therapists: Pilot test of practice change. Developmental coordination disorder questionnaire - translation and adaptation into Danish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1