Relationship between Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Factors and Prognosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Neurology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000530208
Lu Peng, Xiang Li, Hang Li, Yi Zhong, Jinrong Lian, Heng Gao, Gang Chen
{"title":"Relationship between Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Factors and Prognosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lu Peng,&nbsp;Xiang Li,&nbsp;Hang Li,&nbsp;Yi Zhong,&nbsp;Jinrong Lian,&nbsp;Heng Gao,&nbsp;Gang Chen","doi":"10.1159/000530208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe cerebrovascular event with high mortality and disability rate. Neuroinflammation is involved in the brain injury after SAH, but the exact association between SAH progression and peripheral blood inflammatory factors is unknown. Therefore, to determine the relationship between inflammatory factors and the prognosis of SAH, we performed a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing the relationship between inflammatory factors (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-10 [IL-10], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α]) and prognosis of SAH were included in the study. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted based on mRS, GOS, and the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and delayed ischemic neurologic deficits. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. For continuous variables, we calculated the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,469 patients from 18 case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. The results found that patients in the good outcome group had significantly lower CRP levels than those in the poor outcome group (SMD: -1.15, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.66, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 87%), and peripheral IL-6 levels were significantly lower in SAH patients with the good functional outcome than those with the poor functional outcome (SMD: -0.99, 95% CI: -1.48 to -0.51, p &lt; 0.0001, I2 = 88%). As for IL-10 (SMD: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.97 to 0.42, p = 0.43, I2 = 88%) and TNF-α (SMD: -0.40, 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.19, p = 0.18, I2 = 79%), due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity, and uncontrollable factors, robust conclusions cannot be drawn.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAH patients with good prognoses have significantly lower peripheral CRP and IL-6 levels. In addition, due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity, and uncontrollable factors, robust conclusions cannot be drawn for IL-10 and TNF-α. More high-quality studies are needed in the future to provide more specific recommendations for the clinical practice of inflammatory factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":"86 3","pages":"193-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe cerebrovascular event with high mortality and disability rate. Neuroinflammation is involved in the brain injury after SAH, but the exact association between SAH progression and peripheral blood inflammatory factors is unknown. Therefore, to determine the relationship between inflammatory factors and the prognosis of SAH, we performed a meta-analysis.

Method: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing the relationship between inflammatory factors (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-10 [IL-10], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α]) and prognosis of SAH were included in the study. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted based on mRS, GOS, and the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and delayed ischemic neurologic deficits. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. For continuous variables, we calculated the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: 1,469 patients from 18 case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. The results found that patients in the good outcome group had significantly lower CRP levels than those in the poor outcome group (SMD: -1.15, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.66, p < 0.00001, I2 = 87%), and peripheral IL-6 levels were significantly lower in SAH patients with the good functional outcome than those with the poor functional outcome (SMD: -0.99, 95% CI: -1.48 to -0.51, p < 0.0001, I2 = 88%). As for IL-10 (SMD: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.97 to 0.42, p = 0.43, I2 = 88%) and TNF-α (SMD: -0.40, 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.19, p = 0.18, I2 = 79%), due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity, and uncontrollable factors, robust conclusions cannot be drawn.

Conclusion: SAH patients with good prognoses have significantly lower peripheral CRP and IL-6 levels. In addition, due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity, and uncontrollable factors, robust conclusions cannot be drawn for IL-10 and TNF-α. More high-quality studies are needed in the future to provide more specific recommendations for the clinical practice of inflammatory factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周血炎症因子与蛛网膜下腔出血预后关系的meta分析。
蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)是一种死亡率和致残率高的严重脑血管事件。神经炎症参与SAH后的脑损伤,但SAH进展与外周血炎症因子之间的确切关联尚不清楚。因此,为了确定炎症因子与SAH预后之间的关系,我们进行了荟萃分析。方法:系统查阅PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆的相关文献。比较炎症因子(c -反应蛋白[CRP]、白细胞介素-6 [IL-6]、白细胞介素-10 [IL-10]、肿瘤坏死因子[TNF-α])与SAH预后的关系。基于mRS、GOS和脑血管痉挛、迟发性脑缺血、迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损的发生情况进行随机效应荟萃分析。采用留一法进行敏感性分析。病例对照研究的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)用于评估纳入研究的质量。对于连续变量,我们以95%置信区间(CI)计算平均差值。结果:来自18项病例对照研究的1469例患者符合纳入标准。结果发现,预后良好组患者的CRP水平显著低于预后不良组患者(SMD: -1.15, 95% CI: -1.64 ~ -0.66, p <0.00001, I2 = 87%),功能结局良好的SAH患者外周血IL-6水平显著低于功能结局较差的SAH患者(SMD: -0.99, 95% CI: -1.48 ~ -0.51, p <0.0001, i2 = 88%)。至于IL-10 (SMD: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.97 ~ 0.42, p = 0.43, I2 = 88%)和TNF-α (SMD: -0.40, 95% CI: -0.98 ~ 0.19, p = 0.18, I2 = 79%),由于研究数量少,存在异质性和不可控因素,无法得出可靠的结论。结论:预后良好的SAH患者外周血CRP和IL-6水平明显降低。此外,由于研究数量少、异质性和不可控因素,IL-10和TNF-α之间的关系尚不能得出可靠的结论。未来需要更多高质量的研究,为炎症因子的临床实践提供更具体的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
期刊最新文献
SEX DIFFERENCES IN MARKERS OF CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH LOBAR INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE. Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Evolution in the Times of the Pandemic and Multimedia. Causal Associations Between Tea Consumption and REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Continuous versus Routine Electroencephalography in the Intensive Care Unit: A Review of Current Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1