Two-Corner Fusion or Four-Corner Fusion of the Wrist for Midcarpal Osteoarthritis? A Multicenter Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009116
Liron S Duraku, Caroline A Hundepool, Lisa Hoogendam, Ruud W Selles, Brigitte E P A van der Heijden, Joost W Colaris, Steven E R Hovius, J Michiel Zuidam
{"title":"Two-Corner Fusion or Four-Corner Fusion of the Wrist for Midcarpal Osteoarthritis? A Multicenter Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.","authors":"Liron S Duraku,&nbsp;Caroline A Hundepool,&nbsp;Lisa Hoogendam,&nbsp;Ruud W Selles,&nbsp;Brigitte E P A van der Heijden,&nbsp;Joost W Colaris,&nbsp;Steven E R Hovius,&nbsp;J Michiel Zuidam","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000009116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Midcarpal osteoarthritis is a debilitating wrist pain, and a mainstay treatment is midcarpal fusion. The accepted standard for midcarpal fusion is four-corner fusion, but lately, two-corner fusion (i.e., capitolunate fusion) has gained popularity. This is the first prospective, multicenter, cohort study comparing capitolunate fusion with four-corner fusion for midcarpal osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse or scapholunate advanced collapse wrist of grade 2 to 3 undergoing capitolunate fusion or four-corner fusion between 2013 and 2019 were included. Sixty-three patients (34 with capitolunate fusion, 29 with four-corner fusion) were included. Patient demographics were similar between groups. Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation questionnaire score, visual analog scale pain score, grip strength, range of motion, and complications were measured at baseline and 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. Complications (i.e., nonunion, hardware migration, conversion to wrist arthrodesis, or arthroplasty) were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference in Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation or visual analog scale pain score at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between the capitolunate fusion and four-corner fusion groups was not found. There were no differences in grip strength between patient groups preoperatively or 12 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, capitolunate fusion patients had better flexion compared with that in the four-corner fusion group (p = 0.002); there were no differences in complications and reoperation rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Capitolunate fusion and four-corner fusion were comparable in terms of functional scores (i.e., Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation and visual analog scale pain scores) and complication scores. Capitolunate fusion showed favorable wrist mobility compared with four-corner fusion in treatment of midcarpal osteoarthritis. Capitolunate fusion advantages include use of less material, less need for bone-graft harvesting, and easier reduction of the lunate during fixation.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, II.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":"149 6","pages":"1130e-1139e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Midcarpal osteoarthritis is a debilitating wrist pain, and a mainstay treatment is midcarpal fusion. The accepted standard for midcarpal fusion is four-corner fusion, but lately, two-corner fusion (i.e., capitolunate fusion) has gained popularity. This is the first prospective, multicenter, cohort study comparing capitolunate fusion with four-corner fusion for midcarpal osteoarthritis.

Methods: Patients with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse or scapholunate advanced collapse wrist of grade 2 to 3 undergoing capitolunate fusion or four-corner fusion between 2013 and 2019 were included. Sixty-three patients (34 with capitolunate fusion, 29 with four-corner fusion) were included. Patient demographics were similar between groups. Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation questionnaire score, visual analog scale pain score, grip strength, range of motion, and complications were measured at baseline and 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. Complications (i.e., nonunion, hardware migration, conversion to wrist arthrodesis, or arthroplasty) were determined.

Results: A significant difference in Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation or visual analog scale pain score at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between the capitolunate fusion and four-corner fusion groups was not found. There were no differences in grip strength between patient groups preoperatively or 12 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, capitolunate fusion patients had better flexion compared with that in the four-corner fusion group (p = 0.002); there were no differences in complications and reoperation rates between groups.

Conclusions: Capitolunate fusion and four-corner fusion were comparable in terms of functional scores (i.e., Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation and visual analog scale pain scores) and complication scores. Capitolunate fusion showed favorable wrist mobility compared with four-corner fusion in treatment of midcarpal osteoarthritis. Capitolunate fusion advantages include use of less material, less need for bone-graft harvesting, and easier reduction of the lunate during fixation.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, II.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腕中骨关节炎采用腕关节角融合术还是腕关节角融合术?多中心前瞻性比较队列研究。
背景:腕中部骨关节炎是一种使人衰弱的手腕疼痛,主要的治疗方法是腕中部融合。腕中融合的公认标准是四角融合,但最近,两角融合(即头月形融合)越来越受欢迎。这是第一项前瞻性、多中心、队列研究,比较了头月形融合术和四角融合术治疗腕中骨关节炎。方法:选取2013 ~ 2019年2 ~ 3级舟状骨不连晚期塌陷或舟月骨晚期塌陷腕关节行头月骨融合术或四角骨融合术的患者。纳入63例患者(34例头月骨融合术,29例四角骨融合术)。两组患者的人口统计数据相似。在基线、术后3个月和12个月分别测量患者评定腕手评估问卷评分、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、握力、活动范围和并发症。确定并发症(即不愈合、硬体移位、转腕关节固定术或关节成形术)。结果:在头月融合术组和四角融合术组之间,术后3个月和12个月的患者评定腕手评估或视觉模拟量表疼痛评分无显著差异。术前和术后12个月两组患者握力无差异。术后12个月,头月融合术患者屈曲度优于四角融合术组(p = 0.002);两组间并发症及再手术率无差异。结论:头月骨融合术和四角骨融合术在功能评分(即患者评定腕手评估和视觉模拟量表疼痛评分)和并发症评分方面具有可比性。与四角融合术相比,头月骨融合术治疗腕中骨关节炎具有良好的手腕活动能力。头月骨融合的优点包括使用更少的材料,更少的植骨收获,在固定期间更容易复位月骨。临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
"Graduating" from Cleft Care and the Illusion of Finality. Comment on "Unmasking Inequality: The Current State of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery". Safety of Brand Discordant Tissue Expanders and Implants in Staged Breast Reconstruction. Versatility of the LICAP Flap for Enhancing Outcomes of Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Knowing that Someone Had Facial Plastic Surgery Does Not Modify Perceptions of Attractiveness or Social Attributes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1