Evaluación de riesgos y mejora de la seguridad biológica y radiológica en la toma de radiografía torácica a pacientes con COVID-19

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.02.001
N.C. Santisteban Salazar , M.Y. Santisteban Salazar , M.A. Arrasco Barrenechea , M. Llashag Adán
{"title":"Evaluación de riesgos y mejora de la seguridad biológica y radiológica en la toma de radiografía torácica a pacientes con COVID-19","authors":"N.C. Santisteban Salazar ,&nbsp;M.Y. Santisteban Salazar ,&nbsp;M.A. Arrasco Barrenechea ,&nbsp;M. Llashag Adán","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Health workers are at high risk of becoming infected with COVID-19. The objective of the study was to evaluate the risks and improve the biological and radiological safety measures for taking chest X-rays in patients with COVID-19 in a Social Security hospital in Utcubamba (Peru).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Quasi-experimental intervention study type before and after without a control group, carried out between May and September 2020. A process map and an analysis of failure modes and effects (FMEA) of radiological care were prepared. The gravity (G), occurrence (O), and detectability (D) values ??were found and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated for each failure mode (FM). FM with RPN ≥ 100 and G ≥ 7 were prioritized. Improvement actions were implemented based on the recommendations of recognized institutions and the O and D values ??were re-evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The process map consisted of 6 threads and 30 steps. 54 FM were identified, 37 of whom had RPN ≥ 100 and 48 had G ≥ 7. Most of the errors occurred during the examination 50% (27). After entering the recommendations, 23 FM had RPN ≥ 100.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although none of the measures applied through the FMEA made the failure mode impossible, they made it more detectable and less frequent and reduced the RPN for each failure mode; however, a periodic update of the process is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Health workers are at high risk of becoming infected with COVID-19. The objective of the study was to evaluate the risks and improve the biological and radiological safety measures for taking chest X-rays in patients with COVID-19 in a Social Security hospital in Utcubamba (Peru).

Material and methods

Quasi-experimental intervention study type before and after without a control group, carried out between May and September 2020. A process map and an analysis of failure modes and effects (FMEA) of radiological care were prepared. The gravity (G), occurrence (O), and detectability (D) values ??were found and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated for each failure mode (FM). FM with RPN ≥ 100 and G ≥ 7 were prioritized. Improvement actions were implemented based on the recommendations of recognized institutions and the O and D values ??were re-evaluated.

Results

The process map consisted of 6 threads and 30 steps. 54 FM were identified, 37 of whom had RPN ≥ 100 and 48 had G ≥ 7. Most of the errors occurred during the examination 50% (27). After entering the recommendations, 23 FM had RPN ≥ 100.

Conclusions

Although none of the measures applied through the FMEA made the failure mode impossible, they made it more detectable and less frequent and reduced the RPN for each failure mode; however, a periodic update of the process is necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19患者胸片的风险评估和生物和放射安全性的提高
卫生工作者感染COVID-19的风险很高。本研究的目的是评估在乌库班巴(秘鲁)的一家社会保障医院对COVID-19患者进行胸部x光检查的风险并改进生物和放射安全措施。材料与方法2020年5月至9月,前后无对照组的准实验干预研究类型。编制了放射护理过程图和失效模式及影响分析(FMEA)。重力(G)、发生率(O)和可探测性(D)值??,并对每种故障模式(FM)计算风险优先级数(RPN)。RPN≥100、G≥7的FM优先。我们根据认可机构的建议,以及“O”和“D”的价值,推行改善措施。被重新评估。结果该流程图由6个线程30个步骤组成。共鉴定FM 54例,其中RPN≥100者37例,G≥7者48例。大部分错误发生在考试期间,占50%(27)。进入推荐后,有23个FM的RPN≥100。结论通过FMEA应用的措施虽然没有使失效模式不可能,但它们使其更易于检测,频率更低,并降低了每种失效模式的RPN;但是,有必要对流程进行定期更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients]. Determinants of citizens' choice between public and private hospitals. Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1