Trustworthiness judgments without the halo effect: A data-driven computational modeling approach.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Perception Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1177/03010066231178489
DongWon Oh, Nicole Wedel, Brandon Labbree, Alexander Todorov
{"title":"Trustworthiness judgments without the halo effect: A data-driven computational modeling approach.","authors":"DongWon Oh,&nbsp;Nicole Wedel,&nbsp;Brandon Labbree,&nbsp;Alexander Todorov","doi":"10.1177/03010066231178489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trustworthy-looking faces are also perceived as more attractive, but are there other meaningful cues that contribute to perceived trustworthiness? Using data-driven models, we identify these cues after removing attractiveness cues. In Experiment 1, we show that both judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness of faces manipulated by a model of perceived trustworthiness change in the same direction. To control for the effect of attractiveness, we build two new models of perceived trustworthiness: a subtraction model, which forces the perceived attractiveness and trustworthiness to be negatively correlated (Experiment 2), and an orthogonal model, which reduces their correlation (Experiment 3). In both experiments, faces manipulated to appear more trustworthy were indeed perceived to be more trustworthy, but not more attractive. Importantly, in both experiments, these faces were also perceived as more approachable and with more positive expressions, as indicated by both judgments and machine learning algorithms. The current studies show that the visual cues used for trustworthiness and attractiveness judgments can be separated, and that apparent approachability and facial emotion are driving trustworthiness judgments and possibly general valence evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":"52 8","pages":"590-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066231178489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trustworthy-looking faces are also perceived as more attractive, but are there other meaningful cues that contribute to perceived trustworthiness? Using data-driven models, we identify these cues after removing attractiveness cues. In Experiment 1, we show that both judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness of faces manipulated by a model of perceived trustworthiness change in the same direction. To control for the effect of attractiveness, we build two new models of perceived trustworthiness: a subtraction model, which forces the perceived attractiveness and trustworthiness to be negatively correlated (Experiment 2), and an orthogonal model, which reduces their correlation (Experiment 3). In both experiments, faces manipulated to appear more trustworthy were indeed perceived to be more trustworthy, but not more attractive. Importantly, in both experiments, these faces were also perceived as more approachable and with more positive expressions, as indicated by both judgments and machine learning algorithms. The current studies show that the visual cues used for trustworthiness and attractiveness judgments can be separated, and that apparent approachability and facial emotion are driving trustworthiness judgments and possibly general valence evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有光环效应的可信度判断:一种数据驱动的计算建模方法。
看起来值得信赖的脸也被认为更有吸引力,但是否有其他有意义的线索有助于感知可信度呢?使用数据驱动模型,我们在去除吸引力线索后识别这些线索。在实验1中,我们发现在感知可信度模型的操纵下,人们对面孔的可信度和吸引力的判断都朝着同一方向变化。为了控制吸引力的影响,我们建立了两个新的感知可信度模型:减法模型,该模型迫使感知吸引力和可信度呈负相关(实验2),以及正交模型,该模型降低了它们的相关性(实验3)。在两个实验中,被操纵得更值得信赖的面孔确实被认为更值得信赖,但不是更有吸引力。重要的是,在这两个实验中,正如判断和机器学习算法所表明的那样,这些面孔也被认为更平易近人,表情更积极。目前的研究表明,用于可信度和吸引力判断的视觉线索是可以分离的,明显的可接近性和面部情绪驱动着可信度判断和可能的一般效价评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Re-examining our evolutionary propensities toward snakes: Insights from children's inattentional blindness. Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching. The overestimation of gaze for horizontal, vertical, and diagonal fixation points. Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning. The Ames room and the misunderstood versions and depictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1