Synthetic Tabular Data Evaluation in the Health Domain Covering Resemblance, Utility, and Privacy Dimensions.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1760247
Mikel Hernadez, Gorka Epelde, Ane Alberdi, Rodrigo Cilla, Debbie Rankin
{"title":"Synthetic Tabular Data Evaluation in the Health Domain Covering Resemblance, Utility, and Privacy Dimensions.","authors":"Mikel Hernadez,&nbsp;Gorka Epelde,&nbsp;Ane Alberdi,&nbsp;Rodrigo Cilla,&nbsp;Debbie Rankin","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1760247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Synthetic tabular data generation is a potentially valuable technology with great promise for data augmentation and privacy preservation. However, prior to adoption, an empirical assessment of generated synthetic tabular data is required across dimensions relevant to the target application to determine its efficacy. A lack of standardized and objective evaluation and benchmarking strategy for synthetic tabular data in the health domain has been found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper is to identify key dimensions, per dimension metrics, and methods for evaluating synthetic tabular data generated with different techniques and configurations for health domain application development and to provide a strategy to orchestrate them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the literature, the resemblance, utility, and privacy dimensions have been prioritized, and a collection of metrics and methods for their evaluation are orchestrated into a complete evaluation pipeline. This way, a guided and comparative assessment of generated synthetic tabular data can be done, categorizing its quality into three categories (\"<i>Excellent,</i>\" \"<i>Good,</i>\" and \"<i>Poor</i>\"). Six health care-related datasets and four synthetic tabular data generation approaches have been chosen to conduct an analysis and evaluation to verify the utility of the proposed evaluation pipeline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthetic tabular data generated with the four selected approaches has maintained resemblance, utility, and privacy for most datasets and synthetic tabular data generation approach combination. In several datasets, some approaches have outperformed others, while in other datasets, more than one approach has yielded the same performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results have shown that the proposed pipeline can effectively be used to evaluate and benchmark the synthetic tabular data generated by various synthetic tabular data generation approaches. Therefore, this pipeline can support the scientific community in selecting the most suitable synthetic tabular data generation approaches for their data and application of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"62 S 01","pages":"e19-e38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/31/67/10-1055-s-0042-1760247.PMC10306449.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Synthetic tabular data generation is a potentially valuable technology with great promise for data augmentation and privacy preservation. However, prior to adoption, an empirical assessment of generated synthetic tabular data is required across dimensions relevant to the target application to determine its efficacy. A lack of standardized and objective evaluation and benchmarking strategy for synthetic tabular data in the health domain has been found in the literature.

Objective: The aim of this paper is to identify key dimensions, per dimension metrics, and methods for evaluating synthetic tabular data generated with different techniques and configurations for health domain application development and to provide a strategy to orchestrate them.

Methods: Based on the literature, the resemblance, utility, and privacy dimensions have been prioritized, and a collection of metrics and methods for their evaluation are orchestrated into a complete evaluation pipeline. This way, a guided and comparative assessment of generated synthetic tabular data can be done, categorizing its quality into three categories ("Excellent," "Good," and "Poor"). Six health care-related datasets and four synthetic tabular data generation approaches have been chosen to conduct an analysis and evaluation to verify the utility of the proposed evaluation pipeline.

Results: The synthetic tabular data generated with the four selected approaches has maintained resemblance, utility, and privacy for most datasets and synthetic tabular data generation approach combination. In several datasets, some approaches have outperformed others, while in other datasets, more than one approach has yielded the same performance.

Conclusion: The results have shown that the proposed pipeline can effectively be used to evaluate and benchmark the synthetic tabular data generated by various synthetic tabular data generation approaches. Therefore, this pipeline can support the scientific community in selecting the most suitable synthetic tabular data generation approaches for their data and application of interest.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康领域的综合表格数据评估,涵盖相似性、效用和隐私维度。
背景:合成表格数据生成是一种潜在的有价值的技术,在数据增强和隐私保护方面具有很大的前景。然而,在采用之前,需要跨与目标应用程序相关的维度对生成的合成表格数据进行经验评估,以确定其有效性。文献中发现,卫生领域合成表格数据缺乏标准化和客观的评估和基准策略。目的:本文的目的是确定关键维度、每维度度量和评估使用不同技术和配置生成的健康领域应用程序开发的综合表格数据的方法,并提供编排它们的策略。方法:基于文献,相似性、效用和隐私维度已被优先考虑,并将其评估的度量和方法集合编排成一个完整的评估管道。通过这种方式,可以对生成的合成表格数据进行指导和比较评估,将其质量分为三类(“优秀”、“良好”和“差”)。选择了六个卫生保健相关数据集和四种综合表格数据生成方法进行分析和评估,以验证拟议的评估管道的效用。结果:对于大多数数据集和合成表格数据生成方法组合,四种方法生成的合成表格数据保持了相似性、实用性和隐私性。在一些数据集中,一些方法优于其他方法,而在其他数据集中,不止一种方法产生了相同的性能。结论:实验结果表明,该管道可有效地对各种合成表格数据生成方法生成的合成表格数据进行评价和基准测试。因此,这个管道可以支持科学界为他们感兴趣的数据和应用选择最合适的合成表格数据生成方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
期刊最新文献
Harnessing Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Microscopic Vessel Segmentation in Pulmonary Fibrosis Using Novel Hierarchical Phase-Contrast Tomography (HiP-CT) Images. Deciphering Abbreviations in Malaysian Clinical Notes Using Machine Learning. The Significance of Information Quality for the Secondary Use of the Information in the National Health Care Quality Registers in Finland. Leveraging Guideline-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems with Large Language Models: A Case Study with Breast Cancer. Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1