Using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to assess mortality risk in older medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220094
Michael E Detsky, Saeha Shin, Michael Fralick, Laveena Munshi, Jacqueline M Kruser, Katherine R Courtright, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Terence Tang, Shail Rawal, Janice L Kwan, Adina Weinerman, Fahad Razak, Amol A Verma
{"title":"Using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to assess mortality risk in older medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit.","authors":"Michael E Detsky,&nbsp;Saeha Shin,&nbsp;Michael Fralick,&nbsp;Laveena Munshi,&nbsp;Jacqueline M Kruser,&nbsp;Katherine R Courtright,&nbsp;Lauren Lapointe-Shaw,&nbsp;Terence Tang,&nbsp;Shail Rawal,&nbsp;Janice L Kwan,&nbsp;Adina Weinerman,&nbsp;Fahad Razak,&nbsp;Amol A Verma","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognostic information at the time of hospital discharge can help guide goals-of-care discussions for future care. We sought to assess the association between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), which may highlight patients' risk of adverse outcomes at the time of hospital discharge, and in-hospital death among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 12 months of a previous hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study that included patients aged 75 years or older admitted at least twice over a 12-month period to the general medicine service at 7 academic centres and large community-based teaching hospitals in Toronto and Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, from Apr. 1, 2010, to Dec. 31, 2019. The HFRS (categorized as low, moderate or high frailty risk) was calculated at the time of discharge from the first hospital admission. Outcomes included ICU admission and death during the second hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 22 178 patients, of whom 1767 (8.0%) were categorized as having high frailty risk, 9464 (42.7%) as having moderate frailty risk, and 10 947 (49.4%) as having low frailty risk. One hundred patients (5.7%) with high frailty risk were admitted to the ICU, compared to 566 (6.0%) of those with moderate risk and 790 (7.2%) of those with low risk. After adjustment for age, sex, hospital, day of admission, time of admission and Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score, the odds of ICU admission were not significantly different for patients with high (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 1.23) or moderate (adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09) frailty risk compared to those with low frailty risk. Among patients admitted to the ICU, 75 (75.0%) of those with high frailty risk died, compared to 317 (56.0%) of those with moderate risk and 416 (52.7%) of those with low risk. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of death after ICU admission was higher for patients with high frailty risk than for those with low frailty risk (adjusted OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.77 to 4.77).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among patients readmitted to hospital within 12 months, patients with high frailty risk were similarly likely as those with lower frailty risk to be admitted to the ICU but were more likely to die if admitted to ICU. The HFRS at hospital discharge can inform prognosis, which can help guide discussions for preferences for ICU care during future hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 4","pages":"E607-E614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/cd/cmajo.20220094.PMC10325579.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prognostic information at the time of hospital discharge can help guide goals-of-care discussions for future care. We sought to assess the association between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), which may highlight patients' risk of adverse outcomes at the time of hospital discharge, and in-hospital death among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 12 months of a previous hospital discharge.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study that included patients aged 75 years or older admitted at least twice over a 12-month period to the general medicine service at 7 academic centres and large community-based teaching hospitals in Toronto and Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, from Apr. 1, 2010, to Dec. 31, 2019. The HFRS (categorized as low, moderate or high frailty risk) was calculated at the time of discharge from the first hospital admission. Outcomes included ICU admission and death during the second hospital admission.

Results: The cohort included 22 178 patients, of whom 1767 (8.0%) were categorized as having high frailty risk, 9464 (42.7%) as having moderate frailty risk, and 10 947 (49.4%) as having low frailty risk. One hundred patients (5.7%) with high frailty risk were admitted to the ICU, compared to 566 (6.0%) of those with moderate risk and 790 (7.2%) of those with low risk. After adjustment for age, sex, hospital, day of admission, time of admission and Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score, the odds of ICU admission were not significantly different for patients with high (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 1.23) or moderate (adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09) frailty risk compared to those with low frailty risk. Among patients admitted to the ICU, 75 (75.0%) of those with high frailty risk died, compared to 317 (56.0%) of those with moderate risk and 416 (52.7%) of those with low risk. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of death after ICU admission was higher for patients with high frailty risk than for those with low frailty risk (adjusted OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.77 to 4.77).

Interpretation: Among patients readmitted to hospital within 12 months, patients with high frailty risk were similarly likely as those with lower frailty risk to be admitted to the ICU but were more likely to die if admitted to ICU. The HFRS at hospital discharge can inform prognosis, which can help guide discussions for preferences for ICU care during future hospital stays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用医院衰弱风险评分评估重症监护病房住院的老年患者的死亡风险。
背景:出院时的预后信息可以帮助指导未来护理的护理目标讨论。我们试图评估医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)与重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者院内死亡之间的关系,HFRS可以突出患者出院时不良后果的风险,而重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者在出院后12个月内的院内死亡。方法:我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2010年4月1日至2019年12月31日期间在加拿大安大略省多伦多和密西沙加的7个学术中心和大型社区教学医院的普通医学服务部门住院至少两次的75岁及以上患者。在首次住院出院时计算HFRS(分为低、中、高虚弱风险)。结果包括ICU住院和第二次住院期间死亡。结果:该队列纳入22 178例患者,其中1767例(8.0%)为高衰弱风险,9464例(42.7%)为中度衰弱风险,10 947例(49.4%)为低衰弱风险。100例高危患者(5.7%)入住ICU,而566例中度危患者(6.0%)和790例低危患者(7.2%)入住ICU。调整年龄、性别、医院、入院日期、入院时间和实验室急性生理评分后,高(调整优势比[OR] 0.99, 95%置信区间[CI] 0.78 ~ 1.23)或中度(调整优势比[OR] 0.97, 95%置信区间[CI] 0.86 ~ 1.09)衰弱风险患者与低(调整优势比[OR] 0.97 ~ 1.09)衰弱风险患者入住ICU的几率无显著差异。在入住ICU的患者中,75名(75.0%)高危患者死亡,而317名(56.0%)中度高危患者死亡,416名(52.7%)低危患者死亡。多变量调整后,高衰弱风险患者入院后的死亡风险高于低衰弱风险患者(调整后OR为2.86,95% CI为1.77 ~ 4.77)。解释:在12个月内再次入院的患者中,高衰弱风险的患者与低衰弱风险的患者被送入ICU的可能性相似,但如果被送入ICU,死亡的可能性更大。出院时的HFRS可以告知预后,这可以帮助指导讨论未来住院期间对ICU护理的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. Identifying clusters of coexisting conditions and outcomes among adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Is the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in midlife associated with lower risk of cancer? Evidence from 3 European prospective cohorts. Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1