Patient aggression towards receptionists in general practice: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1136/fmch-2023-002171
Fiona Willer, David Chua, Lauren Ball
{"title":"Patient aggression towards receptionists in general practice: a systematic review.","authors":"Fiona Willer, David Chua, Lauren Ball","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>General practice receptionists provide an essential function in the healthcare system but routinely encounter acts of incivility and aggression from patients, including hostility, abuse and violence. This study was conducted to summarise what is known about patient-initiated aggression towards general practice receptionists, including impacts on reception staff and existing mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with convergent integrated synthesis.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies published at any time in English that examine patient aggression experiences of reception staff in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Information sources: </strong>Searches of five major databases were performed (CINAHL Complete, Scopus, PubMed, Healthcare Administration Database and Google Scholar) to August 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies of various designs were included, ranging from the late 1970s to 2022 and originating from five OECD countries. Twelve were assessed as high quality using a validated checklist. Reviewed articles represented 4107 participants; 21.5% were general practice receptionists. All studies reported that displays of aggression towards receptionists by patients were a frequent and routine occurrence in general practice, particularly verbal abuse such as shouting, cursing, accusations of malicious behaviour and use of racist, ablest and sexist insults. Although infrequent, physical violence was widely reported. Inefficient appointment scheduling systems, delayed access to doctors and prescription denial appeared common precipitators. Receptionists adapted their behaviour and demeanour to placate and please patients to avoid escalation of patient frustrations at the cost of their own well-being and clinic productivity. Training in patient aggression management increased receptionist confidence and appeared to decrease negative sequalae. Coordinated support for general practice reception staff who had experienced patient aggression was generally lacking, with a small proportion receiving professional counselling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient aggression towards reception staff is a serious workplace safety concern for general practices and negatively affects healthcare sector function more broadly. Receptionists in general practice deserve evidence-based measures to improve their working conditions and well-being for their own benefit and that of the community.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Pre-registered in Open Science Framework (osf.io/42p85).</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/3d/fmch-2023-002171.PMC10335458.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: General practice receptionists provide an essential function in the healthcare system but routinely encounter acts of incivility and aggression from patients, including hostility, abuse and violence. This study was conducted to summarise what is known about patient-initiated aggression towards general practice receptionists, including impacts on reception staff and existing mitigation strategies.

Design: Systematic review with convergent integrated synthesis.

Eligibility criteria: Studies published at any time in English that examine patient aggression experiences of reception staff in primary care settings.

Information sources: Searches of five major databases were performed (CINAHL Complete, Scopus, PubMed, Healthcare Administration Database and Google Scholar) to August 2022.

Results: Twenty studies of various designs were included, ranging from the late 1970s to 2022 and originating from five OECD countries. Twelve were assessed as high quality using a validated checklist. Reviewed articles represented 4107 participants; 21.5% were general practice receptionists. All studies reported that displays of aggression towards receptionists by patients were a frequent and routine occurrence in general practice, particularly verbal abuse such as shouting, cursing, accusations of malicious behaviour and use of racist, ablest and sexist insults. Although infrequent, physical violence was widely reported. Inefficient appointment scheduling systems, delayed access to doctors and prescription denial appeared common precipitators. Receptionists adapted their behaviour and demeanour to placate and please patients to avoid escalation of patient frustrations at the cost of their own well-being and clinic productivity. Training in patient aggression management increased receptionist confidence and appeared to decrease negative sequalae. Coordinated support for general practice reception staff who had experienced patient aggression was generally lacking, with a small proportion receiving professional counselling.

Conclusions: Patient aggression towards reception staff is a serious workplace safety concern for general practices and negatively affects healthcare sector function more broadly. Receptionists in general practice deserve evidence-based measures to improve their working conditions and well-being for their own benefit and that of the community.

Registration: Pre-registered in Open Science Framework (osf.io/42p85).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病人对全科医生接待员的侵犯:系统性综述。
目的:全科诊所接待员在医疗保健系统中发挥着重要作用,但经常会遇到来自患者的不礼貌和攻击行为,包括敌意、虐待和暴力。本研究旨在总结有关患者对全科诊所接待员发起的攻击行为的已知信息,包括对接待人员的影响和现有的缓解策略:设计:系统综述与聚合综合:信息来源:信息来源:对五大数据库(CINAHL Complete、Scopus、PubMed、Healthcare Administration Database和Google Scholar)进行检索,检索期至2022年8月:结果:共纳入了 20 项不同设计的研究,时间跨度从 20 世纪 70 年代末到 2022 年,来自 5 个经合组织国家。其中 12 项研究通过有效核对表被评为高质量研究。接受审查的文章代表了 4107 名参与者;其中 21.5% 是全科接待员。所有研究都报告称,患者对前台接待员的攻击行为在全科诊所中经常发生,尤其是辱骂,如大喊大叫、咒骂、恶意行为指控以及使用种族主义、最卑劣和性别歧视的侮辱性语言。肢体暴力虽然不常发生,但也有大量报道。预约系统效率低下、看病延迟和拒绝开处方似乎是常见的诱因。接待人员调整自己的行为和举止,安抚和取悦病人,以避免病人的不满情绪升级,从而影响自己的健康和诊所的工作效率。对接待员进行患者攻击管理方面的培训增强了他们的信心,似乎也减少了负面后果。对于遭遇患者侵犯的普通诊所接待人员,普遍缺乏协调支持,只有一小部分人接受了专业辅导:患者对接待人员的侵犯是全科医生工作场所安全的一个严重问题,并对医疗行业的功能产生了广泛的负面影响。全科诊所的接待人员应采取循证措施,改善他们的工作条件和福利,以造福于他们自己和社会:已在开放科学框架(osf.io/42p85)中预先注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
期刊最新文献
fRAP 2.0: a community engagement method applied to cervical cancer disparities among Hispanic women. Survey of international experts on research priorities to improve care for healthy ageing. Global lessons on delivery of primary healthcare services for people with non-communicable diseases: convergent mixed methods. Individual and geospatial factors associated with receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a state-wide mixed-level analysis. Effectiveness of post-COVID-19 primary care attendance in improving survival in very old patients with multimorbidity: a territory-wide target trial emulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1