Investigating Individual Variation Using Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling: A Tutorial with Tinnitus.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/21677026221129279
Thomas L Rodebaugh, Marilyn L Piccirillo, Madelyn R Frumkin, Dorina Kallogjeri, Katherine M Gerull, Jay F Piccirillo
{"title":"Investigating Individual Variation Using Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling: A Tutorial with Tinnitus.","authors":"Thomas L Rodebaugh,&nbsp;Marilyn L Piccirillo,&nbsp;Madelyn R Frumkin,&nbsp;Dorina Kallogjeri,&nbsp;Katherine M Gerull,&nbsp;Jay F Piccirillo","doi":"10.1177/21677026221129279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing body of research suggests that standard group-based models might provide little insight regarding individuals. In the current study, we sought to compare group-based and individual predictors of bothersome tinnitus, illustrating how researchers can use dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) for intensive longitudinal data to examine whether findings from analyses of the group apply to individuals. A total of 43 subjects with bothersome tinnitus responded to up to 200 surveys each. In multi-level DSEM models, survey items loaded on three factors (tinnitus bother, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety) and results indicated a reciprocal relationship between tinnitus bother and anxiety. In fully idiographic models, the three-factor model fit poorly for two individuals, and the multilevel model did not generalize to most individuals, possibly due to limited power. Research examining heterogeneous conditions such as tinnitus bother may benefit from methods such as DSEM that allow researchers to model dynamic relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"11 3","pages":"574-591"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321503/pdf/nihms-1835904.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221129279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that standard group-based models might provide little insight regarding individuals. In the current study, we sought to compare group-based and individual predictors of bothersome tinnitus, illustrating how researchers can use dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) for intensive longitudinal data to examine whether findings from analyses of the group apply to individuals. A total of 43 subjects with bothersome tinnitus responded to up to 200 surveys each. In multi-level DSEM models, survey items loaded on three factors (tinnitus bother, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety) and results indicated a reciprocal relationship between tinnitus bother and anxiety. In fully idiographic models, the three-factor model fit poorly for two individuals, and the multilevel model did not generalize to most individuals, possibly due to limited power. Research examining heterogeneous conditions such as tinnitus bother may benefit from methods such as DSEM that allow researchers to model dynamic relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用动态结构方程模型研究个体差异:耳鸣教程。
越来越多的研究表明,标准的以群体为基础的模型可能无法提供关于个体的洞察力。在当前的研究中,我们试图比较基于群体和个体的恼人耳鸣预测因素,说明研究人员如何使用动态结构方程模型(DSEM)进行密集的纵向数据分析,以检查群体分析的结果是否适用于个体。共有43名患有恼人耳鸣的受试者每人回答了多达200份调查。在多层次的DSEM模型中,调查项目加载了三个因素(耳鸣困扰、认知症状和焦虑),结果显示耳鸣困扰与焦虑之间存在相互关系。在完全具体的模型中,三因素模型对两个个体的拟合较差,而多层模型可能由于功率有限而不能推广到大多数个体。对耳鸣等异质条件的研究可能会受益于DSEM等方法,这些方法允许研究人员建立动态关系模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
期刊最新文献
Testing a Reward-Processing Model of Negative Urgency in Women With and Without Binge Eating Bias in the Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder Among Sexual- and Gender-Minority Persons: Results From a Vignette-Based Experiment Opening the Black Box: The Underlying Working Mechanisms in Virtual-Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders A Bayesian Longitudinal Network Analysis of Panic-Disorder Symptoms and Respiratory Biomarkers Additive Benefits of Individual, Relational, and Community Factors on Physical- and Mental-Health Trajectories Among Black Americans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1