A qualitative assessment of stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators to emergency care delays in Northern Tanzania through the Three Delays

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE African Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afjem.2023.06.007
Leah Hosaka , Anna Tupetz , Francis M. Sakita , Frida Shayo , Catherine Staton , Blandina T. Mmbaga , Anjni Patel Joiner
{"title":"A qualitative assessment of stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators to emergency care delays in Northern Tanzania through the Three Delays","authors":"Leah Hosaka ,&nbsp;Anna Tupetz ,&nbsp;Francis M. Sakita ,&nbsp;Frida Shayo ,&nbsp;Catherine Staton ,&nbsp;Blandina T. Mmbaga ,&nbsp;Anjni Patel Joiner","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Emergency conditions cause a significant burden of death and disability, particularly in developing countries. Prehospital and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are largely nonexistent throughout Tanzania and little is known about the community's barriers to accessing emergency care. The objective of this study was to better understand local community stakeholder perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions surrounding emergency care in the Kilimanjaro region through the Three Delays Model framework.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative assessment of local stakeholders was conducted through semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) from February to June 2021 with five separate groups: hospital administrators, emergency hospital workers, police personnel, fire brigade personnel, and community health workers. FGDs were conducted in Kiswahili, audio recorded, and translated to English verbatim. Two research analysts separately coded the first two FGDs using both inductive and deductive thematic analysis. A final codebook was then created to analyze the remaining FGDs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 24 participants were interviewed. Thematic analysis revealed that participants identified significant barriers within the Three Delays Model as well as identified an additional delay centered on community members and first aid provision. Perceived delays in the decision to seek care, the first delay, were financial constraints and the lack of community education on emergency conditions. Limited infrastructure and reduced transportation access were thought to contribute to the second delay. Potential barriers to receiving timely appropriate care, the third delay, included upfront payments required by hospitals and emergency department intake delays. Suggested solutions focused on increasing education and improving communication and infrastructure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings outline barriers to accessing emergency care from a stakeholder perspective. These themes can support recommendations for further strengthening of the prehospital and emergency care system. Due to logistical constraints, emergency care workers interviewed were all from one hospital and patients were not included.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 191-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency conditions cause a significant burden of death and disability, particularly in developing countries. Prehospital and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are largely nonexistent throughout Tanzania and little is known about the community's barriers to accessing emergency care. The objective of this study was to better understand local community stakeholder perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions surrounding emergency care in the Kilimanjaro region through the Three Delays Model framework.

Methods

A qualitative assessment of local stakeholders was conducted through semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) from February to June 2021 with five separate groups: hospital administrators, emergency hospital workers, police personnel, fire brigade personnel, and community health workers. FGDs were conducted in Kiswahili, audio recorded, and translated to English verbatim. Two research analysts separately coded the first two FGDs using both inductive and deductive thematic analysis. A final codebook was then created to analyze the remaining FGDs.

Results

A total of 24 participants were interviewed. Thematic analysis revealed that participants identified significant barriers within the Three Delays Model as well as identified an additional delay centered on community members and first aid provision. Perceived delays in the decision to seek care, the first delay, were financial constraints and the lack of community education on emergency conditions. Limited infrastructure and reduced transportation access were thought to contribute to the second delay. Potential barriers to receiving timely appropriate care, the third delay, included upfront payments required by hospitals and emergency department intake delays. Suggested solutions focused on increasing education and improving communication and infrastructure.

Conclusion

The findings outline barriers to accessing emergency care from a stakeholder perspective. These themes can support recommendations for further strengthening of the prehospital and emergency care system. Due to logistical constraints, emergency care workers interviewed were all from one hospital and patients were not included.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益攸关方对坦桑尼亚北部三次延误造成的紧急护理延误的障碍和促进者的看法的定性评估
引言紧急情况造成严重的死亡和残疾负担,特别是在发展中国家。坦桑尼亚各地基本上不存在院前和紧急医疗服务(EMS),人们对社区获得紧急护理的障碍知之甚少。本研究的目的是通过三延迟模型框架,更好地了解当地社区利益相关者对乞力马扎罗山地区急救障碍、促进者和潜在解决方案的看法。方法2021年2月至6月,通过半结构化焦点小组讨论(FGD)对当地利益相关者进行定性评估,分为五个小组:医院管理人员、急救医院工作人员、警察、消防队人员和社区卫生工作者。FGD是用斯瓦希里语进行的,录音并逐字翻译成英语。两位研究分析师分别使用归纳和演绎主题分析对前两个FGD进行了编码。然后创建最后的代码簿来分析剩余的FGD。结果共采访了24名参与者。专题分析显示,与会者在“三个延迟模式”中发现了重大障碍,并发现了以社区成员和急救提供为中心的额外延迟。人们认为,寻求护理的决定出现了延误,这是第一次延误,原因是资金限制和缺乏关于紧急情况的社区教育。基础设施有限和运输通道减少被认为是造成第二次延误的原因。获得及时适当护理的潜在障碍,即第三次延误,包括医院要求的预付款和急诊科入院延误。建议的解决方案侧重于增加教育、改善通信和基础设施。结论研究结果从利益相关者的角度概述了获得紧急护理的障碍。这些主题可以支持进一步加强院前和急救系统的建议。由于后勤限制,接受采访的急救人员都来自一家医院,患者不包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
期刊最新文献
Barriers to accessing appendectomy in the public sector health system in the Western Cape Province, South Africa Abstracts from African Conference of Emergency Care 2024. Gaborone, Botswana November 2024 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of emergency medical services in Nairobi, Kenya The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations with suicidal behaviour in a tertiary hospital Emergency Centre in the Eastern Cape, South Africa–A cross-sectional analysis From vocational to graduation: A mixed methods study of support needs for vocational learners pursuing post-graduate education in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1