Telemedicine in pulmonary rehabilitation - benefits of a telerehabilitation program in post-COVID-19 patients: a controlled quasi-experimental study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17534666231167354
Marta de la Plaza San Frutos, Vanesa Abuín Porras, María Blanco Morales, María García Arrabé, Cecilia Estrada Barranco, Margarita Rubio Alonso
{"title":"Telemedicine in pulmonary rehabilitation - benefits of a telerehabilitation program in post-COVID-19 patients: a controlled quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Marta de la Plaza San Frutos,&nbsp;Vanesa Abuín Porras,&nbsp;María Blanco Morales,&nbsp;María García Arrabé,&nbsp;Cecilia Estrada Barranco,&nbsp;Margarita Rubio Alonso","doi":"10.1177/17534666231167354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the results of a Respiratory Telerehabilitation Program implemented to patients post-COVID-19 in postacute phase of mild to critical course of COVID-19 who had persistent respiratory symptoms and had not received any vaccination. The intervention was performed during confinement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental nonrandomized study was conducted in Spain during confinement. Respiratory Telerehabilitation Program was guided by a specialized physical therapist through a web platform (Zoom by Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA, USA). Participants were recruited through social webs. Outcome measures included respiratory rate, heart rate, percutaneous oxygen saturation, Mahler's Dyspnea Index, anxiety status, and quality of life [EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 (EQ-5D)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total number of 148 participants were recruited, with a final number of 100 participants completing the protocol (50 experimental group (EG)/50 control group (CG)). A total of 500 telerehabilitation sessions were performed for this study. In the EG, pre-post intervention comparative analysis showed significative changes in Mahler's functional dyspnea (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (<i>p</i> < 0.001), oxygen saturation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), heart rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001), quality-of-life questionnaire (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and respiratory rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Participants in the CG showed an improvement in all the variables, but the differences were not statistically significant except in Mahler's functional dyspnea (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and in the quality-of-life questionnaire (<i>p</i> = 0.043). Percentage changes in pre-post intervention were calculated and compared between EG and CG. There were statistically significative differences in all the outcomes in favor of the EG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program for COVID-19 not vaccinated survivors in postacute phase with mild to critical course of COVID-19 with respiratory sequelae has proven its benefits in cardiorespiratory variables and dyspnea-related anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"17534666231167354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/c5/10.1177_17534666231167354.PMC10151922.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231167354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the results of a Respiratory Telerehabilitation Program implemented to patients post-COVID-19 in postacute phase of mild to critical course of COVID-19 who had persistent respiratory symptoms and had not received any vaccination. The intervention was performed during confinement.

Methods: A quasi-experimental nonrandomized study was conducted in Spain during confinement. Respiratory Telerehabilitation Program was guided by a specialized physical therapist through a web platform (Zoom by Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA, USA). Participants were recruited through social webs. Outcome measures included respiratory rate, heart rate, percutaneous oxygen saturation, Mahler's Dyspnea Index, anxiety status, and quality of life [EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 (EQ-5D)].

Results: A total number of 148 participants were recruited, with a final number of 100 participants completing the protocol (50 experimental group (EG)/50 control group (CG)). A total of 500 telerehabilitation sessions were performed for this study. In the EG, pre-post intervention comparative analysis showed significative changes in Mahler's functional dyspnea (p < 0.001), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (p < 0.001), oxygen saturation (p < 0.001), heart rate (p < 0.001), quality-of-life questionnaire (p < 0.001), and respiratory rate (p < 0.001). Participants in the CG showed an improvement in all the variables, but the differences were not statistically significant except in Mahler's functional dyspnea (p = 0.001) and in the quality-of-life questionnaire (p = 0.043). Percentage changes in pre-post intervention were calculated and compared between EG and CG. There were statistically significative differences in all the outcomes in favor of the EG.

Conclusion: The implementation of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program for COVID-19 not vaccinated survivors in postacute phase with mild to critical course of COVID-19 with respiratory sequelae has proven its benefits in cardiorespiratory variables and dyspnea-related anxiety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺部康复中的远程医疗——covid -19后患者远程康复计划的益处:一项对照准实验研究
导言:COVID-19大流行给全球医疗保健系统带来了挑战。本研究的目的是评估在COVID-19轻度至危重病程急性期后持续呼吸道症状且未接种任何疫苗的COVID-19后患者实施的呼吸远程康复计划的结果。干预是在禁闭期间进行的。方法:在西班牙坐月子期间进行准实验非随机研究。呼吸远程康复项目由专业物理治疗师通过网络平台(Zoom by Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA, USA)进行指导。参与者是通过社交网站招募的。结局指标包括呼吸频率、心率、经皮氧饱和度、马勒呼吸困难指数、焦虑状态和生活质量[EuroQol 5维度5 (EQ-5D)]。结果:共纳入受试者148人,最终完成方案的受试者为100人(实验组50人/对照组50人)。本研究共进行了500次远程康复治疗。在EG中,干预前和干预后的比较分析显示马勒功能性呼吸困难(p p p p p p = 0.001)和生活质量问卷(p = 0.043)有显著变化。计算并比较EG和CG干预前后的百分比变化。支持EG的所有结果均有统计学差异。结论:对急性期后伴有呼吸后遗症的轻至危重期COVID-19未接种疫苗的幸存者实施肺部远程康复计划已证明其在心肺变量和呼吸困难相关焦虑方面的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
期刊最新文献
Prone positioning during CPAP therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a concise clinical review. Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data. Referral rates and barriers to lung transplantation based on pulmonary function criteria in interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective cohort study. A comparison between a gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire-based algorithm and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index: a new parameter for the identification of non-acid gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1