Specialist Palliative Care and Dementia: Staff Challenges and Learning Needs.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1177/08258597231180966
S J Currie, C Curtin, S Timmons
{"title":"Specialist Palliative Care and Dementia: Staff Challenges and Learning Needs.","authors":"S J Currie, C Curtin, S Timmons","doi":"10.1177/08258597231180966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study explored the perspectives of specialist palliative care (SPC) teams in Ireland, in relation to personal learning needs and education regarding dementia care. <b>Methods:</b> This mixed-methods study involved a survey and focus group. SPC staff were recruited through a professional palliative care society and via hospices in 4 regions. Survey items included challenges in clinical care, personal learning needs, and preferred modes of educational delivery. Quantitative data analysis was descriptive; open-answer survey questions and the focus group transcript underwent thematic analysis. <b>Results:</b> In total, 76 staff completed surveys and rated the following as most challenging: timely access to community agency and specialist support; and managing the needs of people with dementia (PwD). Respondents volunteered additional challenges around the timing/duration of SPC involvement, prognostication, and inadequate knowledge of local services. Staff ranked learning needs as highest in: nonpharmacological management of noncognitive and cognitive symptoms; differentiation of dementia subtypes; and pharmacological management of cognitive symptoms. The focus group (n = 4) gave deeper perspectives on these topics. Overall, 79.2% of staff preferred formal presentations by dementia-care specialists and 76.6% preferred e-learning. <b>Conclusion:</b> Several dementia-care challenges and learning needs are identified by SPC staff, as above. These can inform the design and delivery of tailored education programs for SPC staff. There is also a need for closer working between dementia services and SPC services to provide integrated, holistic care for PwD. One aspect of achieving this is greater awareness of local dementia-care services among SPC staff, and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597231180966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the perspectives of specialist palliative care (SPC) teams in Ireland, in relation to personal learning needs and education regarding dementia care. Methods: This mixed-methods study involved a survey and focus group. SPC staff were recruited through a professional palliative care society and via hospices in 4 regions. Survey items included challenges in clinical care, personal learning needs, and preferred modes of educational delivery. Quantitative data analysis was descriptive; open-answer survey questions and the focus group transcript underwent thematic analysis. Results: In total, 76 staff completed surveys and rated the following as most challenging: timely access to community agency and specialist support; and managing the needs of people with dementia (PwD). Respondents volunteered additional challenges around the timing/duration of SPC involvement, prognostication, and inadequate knowledge of local services. Staff ranked learning needs as highest in: nonpharmacological management of noncognitive and cognitive symptoms; differentiation of dementia subtypes; and pharmacological management of cognitive symptoms. The focus group (n = 4) gave deeper perspectives on these topics. Overall, 79.2% of staff preferred formal presentations by dementia-care specialists and 76.6% preferred e-learning. Conclusion: Several dementia-care challenges and learning needs are identified by SPC staff, as above. These can inform the design and delivery of tailored education programs for SPC staff. There is also a need for closer working between dementia services and SPC services to provide integrated, holistic care for PwD. One aspect of achieving this is greater awareness of local dementia-care services among SPC staff, and vice versa.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息关怀与痴呆症专科:工作人员的挑战和学习需求。
研究目的本研究探讨了爱尔兰姑息关怀(SPC)专科团队对个人学习需求和痴呆症关怀教育的看法。研究方法:这项混合方法研究包括调查和焦点小组。通过姑息关怀专业协会和 4 个地区的临终关怀机构招募 SPC 工作人员。调查项目包括临床护理中面临的挑战、个人学习需求以及偏好的教育方式。对定量数据进行了描述性分析;对开放式调查问题和焦点小组记录进行了主题分析。结果:共有 76 名员工完成了调查,并将以下问题评为最具挑战性:及时获得社区机构和专家的支持;管理痴呆症患者(PwD)的需求。受访者还主动提出了其他挑战,包括 SPC 参与的时间/持续时间、预后以及对当地服务的了解不足。工作人员认为在以下方面的学习需求最高:非认知症状和认知症状的非药物治疗;痴呆症亚型的区分;认知症状的药物治疗。焦点小组(n = 4)对这些主题提出了更深入的看法。总体而言,79.2%的员工倾向于由痴呆症护理专家进行正式讲解,76.6%的员工倾向于电子学习。结论:如上文所述,SPC工作人员发现了一些痴呆症护理方面的挑战和学习需求。这些都可以为制定和实施针对 SPC 员工的教育计划提供参考。此外,还需要加强痴呆症服务机构与 SPC 服务机构之间的合作,为残疾人提供综合、全面的护理服务。实现这一目标的一个方面是提高 SPC 工作人员对当地痴呆症护理服务的认识,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care in the Midst of Adversity: Insights from a Low-Income Country. Gender Distribution of Editorial Board Members in Palliative Care Journals: Assessment of Gender Parity. Cancer Caregiver Anxiety Over Time: The Influence of Palliative Care. Trends, Predictors, and Potential Disparities of Palliative Care Utilization Among Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2020. Barriers and Facilitators of Palliative Care in Older Adults With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1