Specialist Palliative Care and Dementia: Staff Challenges and Learning Needs.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1177/08258597231180966
S J Currie, C Curtin, S Timmons
{"title":"Specialist Palliative Care and Dementia: Staff Challenges and Learning Needs.","authors":"S J Currie, C Curtin, S Timmons","doi":"10.1177/08258597231180966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study explored the perspectives of specialist palliative care (SPC) teams in Ireland, in relation to personal learning needs and education regarding dementia care. <b>Methods:</b> This mixed-methods study involved a survey and focus group. SPC staff were recruited through a professional palliative care society and via hospices in 4 regions. Survey items included challenges in clinical care, personal learning needs, and preferred modes of educational delivery. Quantitative data analysis was descriptive; open-answer survey questions and the focus group transcript underwent thematic analysis. <b>Results:</b> In total, 76 staff completed surveys and rated the following as most challenging: timely access to community agency and specialist support; and managing the needs of people with dementia (PwD). Respondents volunteered additional challenges around the timing/duration of SPC involvement, prognostication, and inadequate knowledge of local services. Staff ranked learning needs as highest in: nonpharmacological management of noncognitive and cognitive symptoms; differentiation of dementia subtypes; and pharmacological management of cognitive symptoms. The focus group (n = 4) gave deeper perspectives on these topics. Overall, 79.2% of staff preferred formal presentations by dementia-care specialists and 76.6% preferred e-learning. <b>Conclusion:</b> Several dementia-care challenges and learning needs are identified by SPC staff, as above. These can inform the design and delivery of tailored education programs for SPC staff. There is also a need for closer working between dementia services and SPC services to provide integrated, holistic care for PwD. One aspect of achieving this is greater awareness of local dementia-care services among SPC staff, and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"282-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597231180966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the perspectives of specialist palliative care (SPC) teams in Ireland, in relation to personal learning needs and education regarding dementia care. Methods: This mixed-methods study involved a survey and focus group. SPC staff were recruited through a professional palliative care society and via hospices in 4 regions. Survey items included challenges in clinical care, personal learning needs, and preferred modes of educational delivery. Quantitative data analysis was descriptive; open-answer survey questions and the focus group transcript underwent thematic analysis. Results: In total, 76 staff completed surveys and rated the following as most challenging: timely access to community agency and specialist support; and managing the needs of people with dementia (PwD). Respondents volunteered additional challenges around the timing/duration of SPC involvement, prognostication, and inadequate knowledge of local services. Staff ranked learning needs as highest in: nonpharmacological management of noncognitive and cognitive symptoms; differentiation of dementia subtypes; and pharmacological management of cognitive symptoms. The focus group (n = 4) gave deeper perspectives on these topics. Overall, 79.2% of staff preferred formal presentations by dementia-care specialists and 76.6% preferred e-learning. Conclusion: Several dementia-care challenges and learning needs are identified by SPC staff, as above. These can inform the design and delivery of tailored education programs for SPC staff. There is also a need for closer working between dementia services and SPC services to provide integrated, holistic care for PwD. One aspect of achieving this is greater awareness of local dementia-care services among SPC staff, and vice versa.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息关怀与痴呆症专科:工作人员的挑战和学习需求。
研究目的本研究探讨了爱尔兰姑息关怀(SPC)专科团队对个人学习需求和痴呆症关怀教育的看法。研究方法:这项混合方法研究包括调查和焦点小组。通过姑息关怀专业协会和 4 个地区的临终关怀机构招募 SPC 工作人员。调查项目包括临床护理中面临的挑战、个人学习需求以及偏好的教育方式。对定量数据进行了描述性分析;对开放式调查问题和焦点小组记录进行了主题分析。结果:共有 76 名员工完成了调查,并将以下问题评为最具挑战性:及时获得社区机构和专家的支持;管理痴呆症患者(PwD)的需求。受访者还主动提出了其他挑战,包括 SPC 参与的时间/持续时间、预后以及对当地服务的了解不足。工作人员认为在以下方面的学习需求最高:非认知症状和认知症状的非药物治疗;痴呆症亚型的区分;认知症状的药物治疗。焦点小组(n = 4)对这些主题提出了更深入的看法。总体而言,79.2%的员工倾向于由痴呆症护理专家进行正式讲解,76.6%的员工倾向于电子学习。结论:如上文所述,SPC工作人员发现了一些痴呆症护理方面的挑战和学习需求。这些都可以为制定和实施针对 SPC 员工的教育计划提供参考。此外,还需要加强痴呆症服务机构与 SPC 服务机构之间的合作,为残疾人提供综合、全面的护理服务。实现这一目标的一个方面是提高 SPC 工作人员对当地痴呆症护理服务的认识,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Inpatient Hospice Access in the United Kingdom: A Spatial Provision Analysis. The Effect of Life Activity Levels of Palliative Care Patients on the Caregivers' Perception of Caregivers Burden. Place of Death for People with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder in New Zealand: A National Retrospective Cohort Study. Invisible Pillars With Hidden Burdens: A Scoping Review on the Challenges of Informal Caregivers for Older Adults in Home-Based Palliative Care. Place of Death in Patients with Motor Neuron Disease and the Association with Comorbidities During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Population-Based Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1