“Youth-focused” versus “whole-family” screen rules: Associations with social media difficulties and moderation by impulsivity

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Research on Adolescence Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1111/jora.12873
Skyler T. Hawk, Ying Wang, Natalie Wong, Yang Xiao, Yan Zhang
{"title":"“Youth-focused” versus “whole-family” screen rules: Associations with social media difficulties and moderation by impulsivity","authors":"Skyler T. Hawk,&nbsp;Ying Wang,&nbsp;Natalie Wong,&nbsp;Yang Xiao,&nbsp;Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jora.12873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many parents attempt to limit adolescents' screen time without changing their own habits. We examined whether “whole-family” versus “youth-focused” restrictions differentially predict social media-related difficulties (procrastination and problematic use), and whether adolescents' impulsive social media behaviors moderated these relationships. Among 183 Chinese early adolescents (58.5% female), whole-family rules negatively predicted procrastination. Impulsivity moderated associations between rulemaking approaches and social media difficulties; youth-focused rules negatively predicted procrastination and problematic use for highly impulsive adolescents, while whole-family rules held no associations or predicted increased difficulties. For less impulsive adolescents, however, whole-family rules negatively predicted social media difficulties and youth-focused rules positively predicted problematic use. Results suggest that setting the implementation of screen rules should involve parental participation and consideration of individual differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"33 4","pages":"1254-1267"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many parents attempt to limit adolescents' screen time without changing their own habits. We examined whether “whole-family” versus “youth-focused” restrictions differentially predict social media-related difficulties (procrastination and problematic use), and whether adolescents' impulsive social media behaviors moderated these relationships. Among 183 Chinese early adolescents (58.5% female), whole-family rules negatively predicted procrastination. Impulsivity moderated associations between rulemaking approaches and social media difficulties; youth-focused rules negatively predicted procrastination and problematic use for highly impulsive adolescents, while whole-family rules held no associations or predicted increased difficulties. For less impulsive adolescents, however, whole-family rules negatively predicted social media difficulties and youth-focused rules positively predicted problematic use. Results suggest that setting the implementation of screen rules should involve parental participation and consideration of individual differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“以年轻人为中心”与“全家人”的屏幕规则:与社交媒体困难和冲动节制的联系。
许多父母试图在不改变自己习惯的情况下限制青少年看屏幕的时间。我们研究了“全家人”和“以青少年为中心”的限制是否在预测社交媒体相关困难(拖延症和有问题的使用)方面存在差异,以及青少年的冲动性社交媒体行为是否会调节这些关系。在183名中国早期青少年中(58.5%为女性),家庭规则对拖延症有负向预测。冲动性调节了规则制定方法与社交媒体困难之间的关联;对于高度冲动的青少年,以青少年为中心的规则对拖延症和有问题的使用有负面预测,而全家规则则没有关联或预测困难增加。然而,对于不那么冲动的青少年,家庭规则对社交媒体困难有负面预测,而针对青少年的规则对社交媒体使用有问题有积极预测。结果表明,制定筛查规则的实施应涉及家长的参与,并考虑到个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
期刊最新文献
Daily association between parent-adolescent emotion contagion: The role of parent-adolescent connectednesss. Commentary: Revisiting developmental science research practices during a global crisis. Commentary: The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on adolescent development: Embracing a more ecological perspective. Strategies to promote safety for sexual and gender minority youth in secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis. Challenging the dichotomy: Examining parent socialization goals and behaviors regarding positive affect in Bengaluru, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1