Outcomes of BDSF technique for osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Latif Zafar Jilani, Mohammad Baqar Abbas, Ziaul Hoda Shaan, Sohail Ahmad, Mazhar Abbas
{"title":"Outcomes of BDSF technique for osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Latif Zafar Jilani,&nbsp;Mohammad Baqar Abbas,&nbsp;Ziaul Hoda Shaan,&nbsp;Sohail Ahmad,&nbsp;Mazhar Abbas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Femoral neck fractures present a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons, especially in young patients who want to preserve their natural femoral head. Conventional methods for fixing these fractures often lead to poor outcomes and high complication rates. The Biplane Double-supported Screw Fixation (BDSF) technique is a novel approach that involves placing screws in two planes simultaneously, creating a two-point support for the screws in the neck and head of the femur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BDSF technique in treating femoral neck fractures in patients aged 20-60 years. A total of 28 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures (less than three weeks old) were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation using the BDSF method. The patients' functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score, and the radiographic outcomes of union, femoral neck shortening, screw back-out, and femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the BDSF technique is a safe and effective method for treating femoral neck fractures in young adults. Out of the 25 patients who were followed up for a mean time of 18 months (range 6-24 months), 20 (80%) achieved fracture union in a mean time of 5.2 months. Non-union occurred in five patients (20%), and AVN of the femoral head was observed in three patients (12%). Two patients experienced varus collapse, but their fractures united successfully.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BDSF technique offers several advantages over conventional methods, including increased stability and improved fixation strength. It can be considered as an alternative to conventional methods for managing femoral neck fractures in young adults, with a low incidence of non-union and avascular necrosis and no cases of fixation failure or varus collapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349321/pdf/ijbt0013-0149.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Femoral neck fractures present a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons, especially in young patients who want to preserve their natural femoral head. Conventional methods for fixing these fractures often lead to poor outcomes and high complication rates. The Biplane Double-supported Screw Fixation (BDSF) technique is a novel approach that involves placing screws in two planes simultaneously, creating a two-point support for the screws in the neck and head of the femur.

Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BDSF technique in treating femoral neck fractures in patients aged 20-60 years. A total of 28 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures (less than three weeks old) were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation using the BDSF method. The patients' functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score, and the radiographic outcomes of union, femoral neck shortening, screw back-out, and femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) were also evaluated.

Results: The results showed that the BDSF technique is a safe and effective method for treating femoral neck fractures in young adults. Out of the 25 patients who were followed up for a mean time of 18 months (range 6-24 months), 20 (80%) achieved fracture union in a mean time of 5.2 months. Non-union occurred in five patients (20%), and AVN of the femoral head was observed in three patients (12%). Two patients experienced varus collapse, but their fractures united successfully.

Conclusion: The BDSF technique offers several advantages over conventional methods, including increased stability and improved fixation strength. It can be considered as an alternative to conventional methods for managing femoral neck fractures in young adults, with a low incidence of non-union and avascular necrosis and no cases of fixation failure or varus collapse.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BDSF技术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效。
股骨颈骨折对骨科医生来说是一个重大的挑战,特别是对于那些想要保留其自然股骨头的年轻患者。传统的方法固定这些骨折往往导致不良的结果和高并发症发生率。双翼双支撑螺钉固定(BDSF)技术是一种新颖的方法,包括同时在两个平面放置螺钉,为股骨颈部和头部的螺钉提供两点支撑。方法:本研究旨在评价BDSF技术治疗20 ~ 60岁股骨颈骨折的疗效。共有28例新生股骨颈骨折(小于3周)患者采用BDSF方法进行闭合复位内固定。使用Harris髋关节评分评估患者的功能结局,并评估愈合、股骨颈缩短、螺钉退出和股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)的影像学结果。结果:BDSF技术是一种安全有效的治疗青年股骨颈骨折的方法。25例患者平均随访18个月(6-24个月),20例(80%)平均5.2个月骨折愈合。5例(20%)患者出现骨不连,3例(12%)患者出现股骨头AVN。2例患者发生内翻塌陷,但骨折成功愈合。结论:与传统方法相比,BDSF技术具有许多优点,包括增加稳定性和提高固定强度。它可以被认为是处理年轻成人股骨颈骨折的传统方法的替代方法,其不愈合和无血管坏死的发生率低,并且没有固定失败或内翻塌陷的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of an enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients with burn injuries. Management of post-traumatic ankle deformities in children. Frostbite secondary to antimycobacterial-induced peripheral neuropathy: a case report. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study. Does early stable fixation reduce complications in paediatric femoral neck fractures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1