Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Depression Treatment Within a TB Program and Primary Care in Brazil.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1177/15248399231183400
Annika Claire Sweetland, Claudio Gruber Mann, Maria Jose Fernandes, Fatima Virginia Siqueira de Menezes Silva, Camila Matsuzaka, Maria Cavalcanti, Sandra Fortes, Afranio Kritski, Austin Y Su, Julio Cesar Ambrosio, Bianca Kann, Milton L Wainberg
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Depression Treatment Within a TB Program and Primary Care in Brazil.","authors":"Annika Claire Sweetland, Claudio Gruber Mann, Maria Jose Fernandes, Fatima Virginia Siqueira de Menezes Silva, Camila Matsuzaka, Maria Cavalcanti, Sandra Fortes, Afranio Kritski, Austin Y Su, Julio Cesar Ambrosio, Bianca Kann, Milton L Wainberg","doi":"10.1177/15248399231183400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis (TB) and depression is common and is associated with poor TB outcomes. The World Health Organization End TB Strategy explicitly calls for the integration of TB and mental health services. Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) is a brief evidence-based treatment for depression that can be delivered by non-mental health specialists with expert supervision. The goal of this study was to explore potential barriers and facilitators to training non-specialist providers to deliver IPC within the TB Control Program and primary care in Itaboraí, Rio de Janeiro state. Data collection consisted of six focus groups (n = 42) with health professionals (n = 29), program coordinators (n = 7), and persons with TB (n = 6). We used open coding to analyze the data, followed by deductive coding using the Chaudoir multi-level framework for implementation outcomes. The main structural barriers identified were poverty, limited access to treatment, political instability, violence, and social stigma. Organizational barriers included an overburdened and under-resourced health system with high staff turnover. Despite high levels of stress and burnout among health professionals, several provider-level facilitators emerged including a high receptivity to, and demand for, mental health training; strong community relationships through the community health workers; and overall acceptance of IPC delivered by any type of health provider. Patients were also receptive to IPC being delivered by any type of professional. No intervention-specific barriers or facilitators were identified. Despite many challenges, integrating depression treatment into primary care in Itaboraí using IPC was perceived as acceptable, feasible, and desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10799967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399231183400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) and depression is common and is associated with poor TB outcomes. The World Health Organization End TB Strategy explicitly calls for the integration of TB and mental health services. Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) is a brief evidence-based treatment for depression that can be delivered by non-mental health specialists with expert supervision. The goal of this study was to explore potential barriers and facilitators to training non-specialist providers to deliver IPC within the TB Control Program and primary care in Itaboraí, Rio de Janeiro state. Data collection consisted of six focus groups (n = 42) with health professionals (n = 29), program coordinators (n = 7), and persons with TB (n = 6). We used open coding to analyze the data, followed by deductive coding using the Chaudoir multi-level framework for implementation outcomes. The main structural barriers identified were poverty, limited access to treatment, political instability, violence, and social stigma. Organizational barriers included an overburdened and under-resourced health system with high staff turnover. Despite high levels of stress and burnout among health professionals, several provider-level facilitators emerged including a high receptivity to, and demand for, mental health training; strong community relationships through the community health workers; and overall acceptance of IPC delivered by any type of health provider. Patients were also receptive to IPC being delivered by any type of professional. No intervention-specific barriers or facilitators were identified. Despite many challenges, integrating depression treatment into primary care in Itaboraí using IPC was perceived as acceptable, feasible, and desirable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西将抑郁症治疗纳入结核病计划和初级保健的障碍和促进因素。
结核病(TB)和抑郁症很常见,并且与结核病的不良后果有关。世界卫生组织终结结核病战略明确要求将结核病和心理健康服务结合起来。人际咨询(IPC)是一种以证据为基础的简短抑郁治疗方法,可在专家指导下由非心理健康专家提供。本研究的目的是探讨在里约热内卢州伊塔博拉伊的结核病控制计划和初级保健中培训非专业医疗服务提供者提供人际咨询的潜在障碍和促进因素。数据收集包括六个焦点小组(n=42),成员包括医疗专业人员(n=29)、项目协调员(n=7)和肺结核患者(n=6)。我们采用开放式编码对数据进行分析,然后使用乔杜瓦多层次实施成果框架进行演绎编码。我们发现的主要结构性障碍包括贫困、治疗机会有限、政治不稳定、暴力和社会羞辱。组织障碍包括卫生系统负担过重、资源不足、人员流动性大。尽管医疗专业人员的压力和职业倦怠程度较高,但还是出现了一些医疗服务提供者层面的促进因素,包括对心理健康培训的高度接受和需求;通过社区医疗工作者建立的牢固的社区关系;以及对任何类型的医疗服务提供者提供的 IPC 的总体接受度。患者也接受由任何类型的专业人员提供 IPC。没有发现针对特定干预措施的障碍或促进因素。尽管存在许多挑战,但在伊塔博拉伊,人们认为利用综合治疗方案将抑郁症治疗纳入初级保健是可以接受的、可行的和可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
期刊最新文献
From Daunting to Doable: Tools for Qualitative Evaluation of a Complex Public Health Intervention. Strengthening Academic Public Health Programs and Workforce Development Through Fieldwork: Insights From a Novel Partnership Between New Mexico's Two Major Universities. Youth and Young Adult Access to Flavored Vaping Products Following a Sales Restriction in New York State: A Mixed Methods Approach. "It Has to Be Culturally Inclusive": Food Distribution Services for Diverse Communities in New York City. A Community-Engaged Research Study to Inform Tailored Programming for Smoking Cessation and Lung Cancer Screening Among At-Risk LGBTQ+ Elders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1