Accuracy of the Swedish quality registry for caries and periodontal diseases (SKaPa) - evaluation in 6- and 12-year-olds in the region of Värmland, Sweden.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1080/00016357.2023.2235422
Tita Kirkinen, Aron Naimi-Akbar, Andreas Cederlund, Sofia Tranæus, Christina Carlson, Gunilla Klingberg
{"title":"Accuracy of the Swedish quality registry for caries and periodontal diseases (SKaPa) - evaluation in 6- and 12-year-olds in the region of Värmland, Sweden.","authors":"Tita Kirkinen,&nbsp;Aron Naimi-Akbar,&nbsp;Andreas Cederlund,&nbsp;Sofia Tranæus,&nbsp;Christina Carlson,&nbsp;Gunilla Klingberg","doi":"10.1080/00016357.2023.2235422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the agreement of data on dental caries between electronic dental records and data retrieved from the national SKaPa-registry (Swedish Quality Registry for caries and periodontal disease), with special reference to e/M in deft/DMFT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a random sample of 500 6- and 12-year-old children having received dental care in 2014 in the county region of Värmland, Sweden, the diagnostic accuracy of data in electronic dental records with corresponding data obtained from the SKaPa-registry was compared by using Cohen's Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For dft/DFT the Kappa was 0.95, and ICC 0.98 (total population). For deft/DMFT in the total population the Kappa was 0.80 and ICC 0.96. For 6-year-olds (deft) the Kappa was 0.89 and ICC 0.99 and for 12-year-olds (DMFT) the Kappa was 0.70, and ICC 0.83. The corresponding figures for Kappa and ICC when excluding individuals without caries (deft/DMFT = 0) were: Total population 0.63 and 0.94; 6-year-olds 0.79 and 0.99; 12-year-olds 0.42 and 0.68.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Agreement between data in the dental records and SKaPa was very high for dft/DFT confirming that transfer from the dental records to the SKaPa-registry is safe and correct. As the accuracy of deft/DMFT was considerably lower than for dft/DFT we advise against using deft/DMFT data from SKaPa for research purposes at this point.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2023.2235422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates the agreement of data on dental caries between electronic dental records and data retrieved from the national SKaPa-registry (Swedish Quality Registry for caries and periodontal disease), with special reference to e/M in deft/DMFT.

Methods: In a random sample of 500 6- and 12-year-old children having received dental care in 2014 in the county region of Värmland, Sweden, the diagnostic accuracy of data in electronic dental records with corresponding data obtained from the SKaPa-registry was compared by using Cohen's Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: For dft/DFT the Kappa was 0.95, and ICC 0.98 (total population). For deft/DMFT in the total population the Kappa was 0.80 and ICC 0.96. For 6-year-olds (deft) the Kappa was 0.89 and ICC 0.99 and for 12-year-olds (DMFT) the Kappa was 0.70, and ICC 0.83. The corresponding figures for Kappa and ICC when excluding individuals without caries (deft/DMFT = 0) were: Total population 0.63 and 0.94; 6-year-olds 0.79 and 0.99; 12-year-olds 0.42 and 0.68.

Conclusion: Agreement between data in the dental records and SKaPa was very high for dft/DFT confirming that transfer from the dental records to the SKaPa-registry is safe and correct. As the accuracy of deft/DMFT was considerably lower than for dft/DFT we advise against using deft/DMFT data from SKaPa for research purposes at this point.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典龋齿和牙周病质量登记(SKaPa)的准确性——对瑞典Värmland地区6岁和12岁儿童的评估。
目的:本研究评估了电子牙科记录与从国家SKaPa注册中心(瑞典龋齿和牙周病质量注册中心)检索的数据之间的龋齿数据的一致性,特别是deft/DMFT中的e/M。方法:在瑞典Värmland县2014年接受牙科护理的500名6岁和12岁儿童的随机样本中,使用Cohen’s Kappa和类内相关系数(ICC)比较电子牙科记录中的数据与SKaPa登记处获得的相应数据的诊断准确性。结果:dft/dft的Kappa为0.95,ICC为0.98(总人口)。对于总人口中的deft/DMFT,Kappa为0.80,ICC为0.96。6岁(deft)的Kappa为0.89,ICC为0.99,12岁(DMFT)的Kap帕为0.70,ICC为0.83。当排除无龋齿个体时,Kappa和ICC的相应数字(deft/DMFT=0)为:总人口0.63和0.94;6岁儿童分别为0.79和0.99;12岁的0.42和0.68。结论:dft/dft在牙科记录中的数据与SKaPa之间的一致性非常高,证实了从牙科记录转移到SKaPa登记是安全和正确的。由于deft/DMFT的精度远低于dft/dft,我们建议此时不要将SKaPa的deft/DMFT数据用于研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the relationship between cycle threshold values and oral manifestations in COVID-19: a comprehensive overview. Sedation of Adults with Orally Administered Midazolam in Dentistry - A Retrospective Study. Chewing Side Preference, Facial Asymmetry and Related Factors in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986. A retrospective study on the influence of inclination of cusp on implant marginal bone height in patients with periodontal disease. The expression of signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) in periodontal cells and tissue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1