Parity and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: a Population-Based Study in Lithuania.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Hormones & Cancer Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s12672-017-0308-3
L Zabuliene, D Jasilionis, E Miseikyte-Kaubriene, R Stukas, A Kaceniene, G Smailyte
{"title":"Parity and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: a Population-Based Study in Lithuania.","authors":"L Zabuliene,&nbsp;D Jasilionis,&nbsp;E Miseikyte-Kaubriene,&nbsp;R Stukas,&nbsp;A Kaceniene,&nbsp;G Smailyte","doi":"10.1007/s12672-017-0308-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An association between parity and thyroid cancer risk has been investigated in a number of independent studies but yielded contradictory findings. The aim of this study was to explore the association between parity and thyroid cancer risk. The population-based cohort study in Lithuanian was conducted. The study dataset based on the linkages between all records from the 2001 population census, all cancer incidence records from the Lithuanian Cancer Registry, and all death and emigration records from Statistics Lithuania for the period between 6 April 2001 and 31 December 2009. Cox's proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for parity, age at first birth, number of children, place of residence, education, and age at census. The cohort of 868,105 women was followed for 8.6 years, and 1775 thyroid cancer cases were diagnosed during the study period. The significantly higher thyroid cancer risk was observed among parous women (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.75) and in women with 1, 2, and 3 children, after adjusting for the possible confounding effects of relevant demographic variables. The findings of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that parity might be associated with the risk of thyroid cancer in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":13060,"journal":{"name":"Hormones & Cancer","volume":"8 5-6","pages":"325-329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12672-017-0308-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormones & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-017-0308-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

An association between parity and thyroid cancer risk has been investigated in a number of independent studies but yielded contradictory findings. The aim of this study was to explore the association between parity and thyroid cancer risk. The population-based cohort study in Lithuanian was conducted. The study dataset based on the linkages between all records from the 2001 population census, all cancer incidence records from the Lithuanian Cancer Registry, and all death and emigration records from Statistics Lithuania for the period between 6 April 2001 and 31 December 2009. Cox's proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for parity, age at first birth, number of children, place of residence, education, and age at census. The cohort of 868,105 women was followed for 8.6 years, and 1775 thyroid cancer cases were diagnosed during the study period. The significantly higher thyroid cancer risk was observed among parous women (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.75) and in women with 1, 2, and 3 children, after adjusting for the possible confounding effects of relevant demographic variables. The findings of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that parity might be associated with the risk of thyroid cancer in women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎次和甲状腺癌的风险:立陶宛一项基于人群的研究。
胎次和甲状腺癌风险之间的关系已经在一些独立的研究中进行了调查,但得出了相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是探讨胎次与甲状腺癌风险之间的关系。在立陶宛进行了以人群为基础的队列研究。该研究数据集基于2001年人口普查的所有记录、立陶宛癌症登记处的所有癌症发病率记录以及立陶宛统计局2001年4月6日至2009年12月31日期间的所有死亡和移民记录之间的联系。采用Cox比例风险回归模型估计胎次、第一胎年龄、子女数量、居住地、教育程度和普查年龄的风险比(hr)。研究人员对868105名女性进行了8.6年的随访,在研究期间诊断出1775例甲状腺癌病例。在对相关人口统计学变量可能的混杂效应进行调整后,在已生育的妇女(HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.75)和育有1、2和3个孩子的妇女中观察到甲状腺癌风险明显较高。这项研究的结果与胎次可能与女性患甲状腺癌的风险有关的假设是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hormones & Cancer
Hormones & Cancer ONCOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hormones and Cancer is a unique multidisciplinary translational journal featuring basic science, pre-clinical, epidemiological, and clinical research papers. It covers all aspects of the interface of Endocrinology and Oncology. Thus, the journal covers two main areas of research: Endocrine tumors (benign & malignant tumors of hormone secreting endocrine organs) and the effects of hormones on any type of tumor. We welcome all types of studies related to these fields, but our particular attention is on translational aspects of research. In addition to basic, pre-clinical, and epidemiological studies, we encourage submission of clinical studies including those that comprise small series of tumors in rare endocrine neoplasias and/or negative or confirmatory results provided that they significantly enhance our understanding of endocrine aspects of oncology. The journal does not publish case studies.
期刊最新文献
Welcome from the new Discover Oncology journal : Editorial - 28th December, 2020. Nuclear PDCD4 Expression Defines a Subset of Luminal B-Like Breast Cancers with Good Prognosis. Prevalence of Histological Characteristics of Breast Cancer in Rwanda in Relation to Age and Tumor Stages. The Thyroid Tumor Microenvironment: Potential Targets for Therapeutic Intervention and Prognostication. Outcome of Clinical Genetic Testing in Patients with Features Suggestive for Hereditary Predisposition to PTH-Mediated Hypercalcemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1