Romantic racism: How racial preferences (and beliefs about racial preferences) reinforce hierarchy in U.S. interracial relationships.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1037/cdp0000592
Sakaria Laisene Auelua-Toomey, Steven Othello Roberts
{"title":"Romantic racism: How racial preferences (and beliefs about racial preferences) reinforce hierarchy in U.S. interracial relationships.","authors":"Sakaria Laisene Auelua-Toomey, Steven Othello Roberts","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the United States, the two most common interracial marriages are between Asian women and White men, and between Black men and White women. Previous research proposed that the reason for these pairings stems from White Americans' racial preferences, such that White men prefer Asian women over Black women (i.e., the group stereotyped as more feminine), whereas White women prefer Black men over Asian men (i.e., the group stereotyped as more masculine). Here, we argue that focusing solely on White Americans' preferences neglects the reality that Americans of color also have preferences (and beliefs about others' preferences) that contribute to the composition of U.S. interracial relationships.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used multiple methodologies (i.e., surveys and experimental manipulations) to examine Asian, Black, and White Americans beliefs about others' preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across three studies (<i>N</i> = 3,728), we reveal that Asian, Black, and White Americans have beliefs about others' preferences (Study 1), that those beliefs mirror their own preferences (Study 2), and that those beliefs have causal implications for their own preferences (Study 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collectively, these findings reveal that such beliefs (and preferences) advantage White Americans, such that both Asian and Black Americans believe that they are more attractive to White Americans than to each other, which leads them to be more attracted to White Americans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the United States, the two most common interracial marriages are between Asian women and White men, and between Black men and White women. Previous research proposed that the reason for these pairings stems from White Americans' racial preferences, such that White men prefer Asian women over Black women (i.e., the group stereotyped as more feminine), whereas White women prefer Black men over Asian men (i.e., the group stereotyped as more masculine). Here, we argue that focusing solely on White Americans' preferences neglects the reality that Americans of color also have preferences (and beliefs about others' preferences) that contribute to the composition of U.S. interracial relationships.

Method: We used multiple methodologies (i.e., surveys and experimental manipulations) to examine Asian, Black, and White Americans beliefs about others' preferences.

Results: Across three studies (N = 3,728), we reveal that Asian, Black, and White Americans have beliefs about others' preferences (Study 1), that those beliefs mirror their own preferences (Study 2), and that those beliefs have causal implications for their own preferences (Study 3).

Conclusion: Collectively, these findings reveal that such beliefs (and preferences) advantage White Americans, such that both Asian and Black Americans believe that they are more attractive to White Americans than to each other, which leads them to be more attracted to White Americans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浪漫种族主义:种族偏好(以及关于种族偏好的信念)如何强化美国异族关系中的等级制度。
目标:在美国,最常见的两种异族通婚是亚裔女性与白人男性之间的婚姻,以及黑人男性与白人女性之间的婚姻。以往的研究认为,这些婚姻配对的原因在于美国白人的种族偏好,比如白人男性更喜欢亚裔女性而非黑人女性(即刻板印象中更女性化的群体),而白人女性更喜欢黑人男性而非亚裔男性(即刻板印象中更男性化的群体)。在此,我们认为,只关注美国白人的偏好忽视了一个现实,即有色人种也有偏好(以及对他人偏好的看法),而这些偏好促成了美国异族关系的构成:我们采用多种方法(即调查和实验操作)来研究亚裔、黑人和白人对他人偏好的看法:通过三项研究(N = 3,728),我们发现亚裔美国人、黑人美国人和白人美国人都有关于他人偏好的信念(研究 1),这些信念反映了他们自己的偏好(研究 2),并且这些信念对他们自己的偏好有因果影响(研究 3):总之,这些研究结果表明,这种信念(和偏好)对美国白人有利,例如,亚裔美国人和黑人美国人都认为他们对美国白人的吸引力大于对彼此的吸引力,这导致他们对美国白人的吸引力更大。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
期刊最新文献
Criminality, foreignness, and illness stereotypes underlie racial minorities' social identity threat wearing different face masks during COVID-19. Latent profiles of perceived discrimination, bicultural stress, and negative context of reception and associations with mental health in a sample of Hispanic and Somali adolescents. Validation of the Coping With Discrimination Scale among Arab/Middle Eastern North African Americans. Voices and experiences of Moroccan-heritage women and men in Spain: Understanding affective reactions to injustice through mixed-methods. Responding responsively: Benefits of responsive racism-specific support for Black college students in same- and cross-race friendships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1