Germline whole genome sequencing in adults with multiple primary tumors.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Familial Cancer Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s10689-023-00343-2
Yiming Wang, Qiliang Ding, Stephenie Prokopec, Kirsten M Farncombe, Jeffrey Bruce, Selina Casalino, Jeanna McCuaig, Marta Szybowska, Kalene van Engelen, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Trevor J Pugh, Raymond H Kim
{"title":"Germline whole genome sequencing in adults with multiple primary tumors.","authors":"Yiming Wang,&nbsp;Qiliang Ding,&nbsp;Stephenie Prokopec,&nbsp;Kirsten M Farncombe,&nbsp;Jeffrey Bruce,&nbsp;Selina Casalino,&nbsp;Jeanna McCuaig,&nbsp;Marta Szybowska,&nbsp;Kalene van Engelen,&nbsp;Jordan Lerner-Ellis,&nbsp;Trevor J Pugh,&nbsp;Raymond H Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10689-023-00343-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple primary tumors (MPTs) are a harbinger of hereditary cancer syndromes. Affected individuals often fit genetic testing criteria for a number of hereditary cancer genes and undergo multigene panel testing. Other genomic testing options, such as whole exome (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) are available, but the utility of these genomic approaches as a second-tier test for those with uninformative multigene panel testing has not been explored. Here, we report our germline sequencing results from WGS in 9 patients with MPTs who had non-informative multigene panel testing. Following germline WGS, sequence (agnostic or 735 selected genes) and copy number variant (CNV) analysis was performed according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants and reporting CNVs. In this cohort, WGS, as a second-tier test, did not identify additional pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. Although we identified a CHEK2 likely pathogenic variant and a MUTYH pathogenic variant, both were previously identified in the multigene panels and were not explanatory for the presented type of tumors. CNV analysis also failed to identify any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. In summary, after multigene panel testing, WGS did not reveal any additional pathogenic variants in patients with MPTs. Our study, based on a small cohort of patients with MPT, suggests that germline gene panel testing may be sufficient to investigate these cases. Future studies with larger sample sizes may further elucidate the additional utility of WGS in MPTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"513-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-023-00343-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple primary tumors (MPTs) are a harbinger of hereditary cancer syndromes. Affected individuals often fit genetic testing criteria for a number of hereditary cancer genes and undergo multigene panel testing. Other genomic testing options, such as whole exome (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) are available, but the utility of these genomic approaches as a second-tier test for those with uninformative multigene panel testing has not been explored. Here, we report our germline sequencing results from WGS in 9 patients with MPTs who had non-informative multigene panel testing. Following germline WGS, sequence (agnostic or 735 selected genes) and copy number variant (CNV) analysis was performed according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants and reporting CNVs. In this cohort, WGS, as a second-tier test, did not identify additional pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. Although we identified a CHEK2 likely pathogenic variant and a MUTYH pathogenic variant, both were previously identified in the multigene panels and were not explanatory for the presented type of tumors. CNV analysis also failed to identify any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. In summary, after multigene panel testing, WGS did not reveal any additional pathogenic variants in patients with MPTs. Our study, based on a small cohort of patients with MPT, suggests that germline gene panel testing may be sufficient to investigate these cases. Future studies with larger sample sizes may further elucidate the additional utility of WGS in MPTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人多原发性肿瘤种系全基因组测序。
多原发性肿瘤是遗传性癌症综合征的前兆。受影响的个体通常符合许多遗传性癌症基因的基因检测标准,并接受多基因小组检测。其他基因组测试选项,如全外显子组(WES)和全基因组测序(WGS)也是可用的,但这些基因组方法作为第二级测试对那些没有信息的多基因小组测试的效用尚未探索。在这里,我们报告了9名MPTs患者的WGS种系测序结果,这些患者进行了非信息性多基因小组测试。在种系WGS之后,根据美国医学遗传学学会(ACMG)解释序列变异和报告CNV的标准和指南,进行序列(不可知基因或735个选定基因)和拷贝数变异(CNV)分析。在该队列中,WGS作为第二级测试,没有在癌症易感性基因中识别出额外的致病性或可能的致病性变体。尽管我们发现了一种CHEK2可能的致病性变体和一种MUTYH致病性变体,但这两种变体都是先前在多基因组中发现的,并且不能解释所呈现的肿瘤类型。CNV分析也未能确定癌症易感性基因中的任何致病性或可能的致病性变体。总之,经过多基因小组测试,WGS没有在MPTs患者中发现任何额外的致病性变异。我们的研究基于一小群MPT患者,表明种系基因小组测试可能足以调查这些病例。未来更大样本量的研究可能会进一步阐明WGS在MPTs中的额外效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
期刊最新文献
The challenge of preventing gastric cancer in patients under surveillance for familial adenomatous polyposis. Haplotype analysis detects MLH1 founder variant in Indian Lynch syndrome patient cohort. Bilateral familial retinoblastoma diagnosed via optical coherence tomography following a normal funduscopic exam. Recurrent paraneoplastic nephrotic syndrome; insights from a Lynch syndrome patient with multiple malignancies. Sarcomas arising in MEN1 patients: demonstrating LOH of the MEN1 locus and loss of menin expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1