Validity and reliability of the Turkish Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T) in mental health.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2022.2164351
Selma Ercan Doğu, Ayla Günal, Serkan Pekçetin, Sibel Örsel, Petra Wagman, Carita Håkansson
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Turkish Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T) in mental health.","authors":"Selma Ercan Doğu,&nbsp;Ayla Günal,&nbsp;Serkan Pekçetin,&nbsp;Sibel Örsel,&nbsp;Petra Wagman,&nbsp;Carita Håkansson","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2022.2164351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with psychiatric disabilities often find it difficult to maintain a satisfactory occupational balance.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T) in mental health.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>OBQ11-T was applied to 149 people for construct validity analysis and to 61 of them for reliability analysis. Validity was determined using factor analyses. The reliability of the OBQ between the first and second evaluations was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each item and the total OBQ11-T score. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of factor analysis revealed one factor that explains 35.94% of the total variance in the model. OBQ11-T item 1 had the lowest and OBQ11-T item 4 had the highest factor loadings. The model fits the data according to the indices of relative fit (RMSEA = 0.087, CMIN/DF = 2.129, CFI = 0.901). There was an excellent correlation between test and retest OBQ11-T total scores (ICC = 0.905). All items of the OBQ11-T showed good reliability. Cronbach's alpha for the OBQ11-T total score was 0.839, indicating acceptable internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The current study showed that OBQ11-T is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the self-rated occupational balance of people with mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2164351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with psychiatric disabilities often find it difficult to maintain a satisfactory occupational balance.

Aims/objectives: This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T) in mental health.

Material and methods: OBQ11-T was applied to 149 people for construct validity analysis and to 61 of them for reliability analysis. Validity was determined using factor analyses. The reliability of the OBQ between the first and second evaluations was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each item and the total OBQ11-T score. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The results of factor analysis revealed one factor that explains 35.94% of the total variance in the model. OBQ11-T item 1 had the lowest and OBQ11-T item 4 had the highest factor loadings. The model fits the data according to the indices of relative fit (RMSEA = 0.087, CMIN/DF = 2.129, CFI = 0.901). There was an excellent correlation between test and retest OBQ11-T total scores (ICC = 0.905). All items of the OBQ11-T showed good reliability. Cronbach's alpha for the OBQ11-T total score was 0.839, indicating acceptable internal consistency.

Conclusions and significance: The current study showed that OBQ11-T is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the self-rated occupational balance of people with mental illness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其职业平衡问卷(OBQ11-T)在心理健康方面的效度和信度
背景:精神障碍患者往往难以维持令人满意的职业平衡。目的/目的:本研究旨在调查土耳其版职业平衡问卷(OBQ11-T)在心理健康方面的效度和信度。材料与方法:采用OBQ11-T对149人进行结构效度分析,对61人进行信度分析。效度采用因子分析确定。使用各项目的类内相关系数(ICC)和OBQ11-T总分来评估第一次和第二次评价之间OBQ的信度。内部一致性采用Cronbach’s alpha评价。结果:因子分析结果显示,一个因子解释了模型总方差的35.94%。OBQ11-T题1因子负荷最低,OBQ11-T题4因子负荷最高。模型根据相对拟合指标(RMSEA = 0.087, CMIN/DF = 2.129, CFI = 0.901)对数据进行拟合。测试与复测OBQ11-T总分之间存在极好的相关性(ICC = 0.905)。OBQ11-T各项目均显示良好的信度。OBQ11-T总分的Cronbach’s alpha为0.839,内部一致性可接受。结论与意义:本研究表明,OBQ11-T是一种有效、可靠的测量精神疾病患者自评职业平衡的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Defining the future of occupational therapy: A concept analysis of leadership development. Fostering social participation among older adults: Perspectives of stakeholders. 'A new sense of my former self' - transforming the self through vocational rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury. Psychometric properties of the arabic version of occupational value with pre-defined ítems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1