Accuracy Evaluation Trial of Mixed Reality-Guided Spinal Puncture Technology.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S416918
Jiajun Wu, Lei Gao, Qiao Shi, Chunhui Qin, Kai Xu, Zhaoshun Jiang, Xixue Zhang, Ming Li, Jianjian Qiu, Weidong Gu
{"title":"Accuracy Evaluation Trial of Mixed Reality-Guided Spinal Puncture Technology.","authors":"Jiajun Wu,&nbsp;Lei Gao,&nbsp;Qiao Shi,&nbsp;Chunhui Qin,&nbsp;Kai Xu,&nbsp;Zhaoshun Jiang,&nbsp;Xixue Zhang,&nbsp;Ming Li,&nbsp;Jianjian Qiu,&nbsp;Weidong Gu","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S416918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of mixed reality (MR)-guided visualization technology for spinal puncture (MRsp).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRsp involved the following three steps: 1. Lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) data were obtained to reconstruct virtual 3D images, which were imported into a HoloLens (2nd gen). 2. The patented MR system quickly recognized the spatial orientation and superimposed the virtual image over the real spine in the HoloLens. 3. The operator performed the spinal puncture with structural information provided by the virtual image. A posture fixation cushion was used to keep the subjects' lateral decubitus position consistent. 12 subjects were recruited to verify the setup error and the registration error. The setup error was calculated using the first two CT scans and measuring the displacement of two location markers. The projection points of the upper edge of the L3 spinous process (L3↑), the lower edge of the L3 spinous process (L3↓), and the lower edge of the L4 spinous process (L4↓) in the virtual image were positioned and marked on the skin as the registration markers. A third CT scan was performed to determine the registration error by measuring the displacement between the three registration markers and the corresponding real spinous process edges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The setup errors in the position of the cranial location marker between CT scans along the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) axes of the CT bed measured 0.09 ± 0.06 cm, 0.30 ± 0.28 cm, and 0.22 ± 0.12 cm, respectively, while those of the position of the caudal location marker measured 0.08 ± 0.06 cm, 0.29 ± 0.18 cm, and 0.18 ± 0.10 cm, respectively. The registration errors between the three registration markers and the subject's real L3↑, L3↓, and L4↓ were 0.11 ± 0.09 cm, 0.15 ± 0.13 cm, and 0.13 ± 0.10 cm, respectively, in the SI direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MR-guided visualization technology for spinal puncture can accurately and quickly superimpose the reconstructed 3D CT images over a real human spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/83/tcrm-19-599.PMC10361284.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S416918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of mixed reality (MR)-guided visualization technology for spinal puncture (MRsp).

Methods: MRsp involved the following three steps: 1. Lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) data were obtained to reconstruct virtual 3D images, which were imported into a HoloLens (2nd gen). 2. The patented MR system quickly recognized the spatial orientation and superimposed the virtual image over the real spine in the HoloLens. 3. The operator performed the spinal puncture with structural information provided by the virtual image. A posture fixation cushion was used to keep the subjects' lateral decubitus position consistent. 12 subjects were recruited to verify the setup error and the registration error. The setup error was calculated using the first two CT scans and measuring the displacement of two location markers. The projection points of the upper edge of the L3 spinous process (L3↑), the lower edge of the L3 spinous process (L3↓), and the lower edge of the L4 spinous process (L4↓) in the virtual image were positioned and marked on the skin as the registration markers. A third CT scan was performed to determine the registration error by measuring the displacement between the three registration markers and the corresponding real spinous process edges.

Results: The setup errors in the position of the cranial location marker between CT scans along the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) axes of the CT bed measured 0.09 ± 0.06 cm, 0.30 ± 0.28 cm, and 0.22 ± 0.12 cm, respectively, while those of the position of the caudal location marker measured 0.08 ± 0.06 cm, 0.29 ± 0.18 cm, and 0.18 ± 0.10 cm, respectively. The registration errors between the three registration markers and the subject's real L3↑, L3↓, and L4↓ were 0.11 ± 0.09 cm, 0.15 ± 0.13 cm, and 0.13 ± 0.10 cm, respectively, in the SI direction.

Conclusion: This MR-guided visualization technology for spinal puncture can accurately and quickly superimpose the reconstructed 3D CT images over a real human spine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合现实引导脊柱穿刺技术准确性评估试验。
目的:评价混合现实(MR)引导下脊柱穿刺(MRsp)可视化技术的准确性。方法:MRsp包括以下三个步骤:1。获取腰椎计算机断层扫描(CT)数据,重建虚拟三维图像,并将其导入HoloLens(第二代)。2. 专利MR系统快速识别空间方向,并在HoloLens中将虚拟图像叠加在真实脊柱上。3.操作员使用虚拟图像提供的结构信息进行脊柱穿刺。采用体位固定垫保持受试者侧卧位一致。选取12名被试进行设置误差和注册误差的验证。通过前两次CT扫描和测量两个位置标记的位移来计算安装误差。将虚拟图像中L3棘突上边缘(L3↑)、L3棘突下边缘(L3↓)、L4棘突下边缘(L4↓)的投影点定位并标记在皮肤上作为配准标记。第三次CT扫描通过测量三个配准标记与对应的真实棘突边缘之间的位移来确定配准误差。结果:颅脑定位标记在CT床左右(LR)、前后(AP)、上下(SI)轴上的定位误差分别为0.09±0.06 cm、0.30±0.28 cm、0.22±0.12 cm,尾侧定位标记在CT床左右(LR)轴上的定位误差分别为0.08±0.06 cm、0.29±0.18 cm、0.18±0.10 cm。三个配准标记与受试者真实L3↑、L3↓、L4↓在SI方向上的配准误差分别为0.11±0.09 cm、0.15±0.13 cm、0.13±0.10 cm。结论:mri引导下的脊柱穿刺可视化技术可以准确、快速地将重建的三维CT图像叠加在真实的人体脊柱上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
The Etiologic Landscape of Lymphoproliferation in Childhood: Proposal for a Diagnostic Approach Exploring from Infections to Inborn Errors of Immunity and Metabolic Diseases Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia. Factors Affecting Radial Artery Occlusion After Right Transradial Artery Catheterization for Coronary Intervention and Procedures. Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate on Healing of Non-Unions: An Observational Study of over 400 Non-Unions. Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Older Adults: A Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1