Effect of a Japanese Version of the Burns Wean Assessment Program e-Learning Materials on Ventilator Withdrawal for Intensive Care Unit Nurses.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000566
Rika Kimura, Naoko Hayashi, Akemi Utsunomiya
{"title":"Effect of a Japanese Version of the Burns Wean Assessment Program e-Learning Materials on Ventilator Withdrawal for Intensive Care Unit Nurses.","authors":"Rika Kimura,&nbsp;Naoko Hayashi,&nbsp;Akemi Utsunomiya","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No assessment tool for predicting ventilator withdrawal success is currently available in Japan. Thus, an accessible and valid assessment tool to address this issue is needed. The Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP) has been validated as a reliable predictor of ventilator withdrawal outcomes. However, nurses must be familiar with this tool to ensure its efficient utilization in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to examine the effect of a 26-item Japanese version of BWAP (J-BWAP) e-learning materials on ventilator withdrawal in a sample of intensive care unit nurses in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BWAP was translated into Japanese, checked, and verified as the J-BWAP. Nonrandomized intensive care unit nurses from six hospitals were assigned to three groups, including Intervention Group 1 (e-learning in one session), Intervention Group 2 (e-learning over three sessions during 1 week), and the control group. The participants underwent pretests and posttests using web-based, simulated patients. The primary outcome measure was the difference in online pretest and posttest total scores among the two intervention groups and the control group. The feasibility of the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials was evaluated using four frameworks: acceptability, demand, implementation, and adaptation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 48 participants in the study, 32 completed the posttest and were included in the analysis (dropout rate: 33.3%). The difference between pretest and posttest scores was significantly higher in the intervention groups than the control group (2 vs. -1, p = .0191) and in Intervention Group 2 than the control group (2.0 vs. -0.5, p = .049). The feasibility frameworks for the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials were mostly positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The development of the J-BWAP and training nurses using e-learning were shown to be feasible in this study. The J-BWAP contents are appropriate for predicting the outcome of mechanical ventilation withdrawal. The J-BWAP has the potential to become a common tool among Japanese medical professionals after the contents are further simplified for daily application in clinical practice. Subsequent studies should verify the reliability and validity of this tool and test the real-world utility of the J-BWAP using randomized controlled trials in Japanese clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"31 4","pages":"e287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No assessment tool for predicting ventilator withdrawal success is currently available in Japan. Thus, an accessible and valid assessment tool to address this issue is needed. The Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP) has been validated as a reliable predictor of ventilator withdrawal outcomes. However, nurses must be familiar with this tool to ensure its efficient utilization in clinical settings.

Purpose: This study was designed to examine the effect of a 26-item Japanese version of BWAP (J-BWAP) e-learning materials on ventilator withdrawal in a sample of intensive care unit nurses in Japan.

Methods: The BWAP was translated into Japanese, checked, and verified as the J-BWAP. Nonrandomized intensive care unit nurses from six hospitals were assigned to three groups, including Intervention Group 1 (e-learning in one session), Intervention Group 2 (e-learning over three sessions during 1 week), and the control group. The participants underwent pretests and posttests using web-based, simulated patients. The primary outcome measure was the difference in online pretest and posttest total scores among the two intervention groups and the control group. The feasibility of the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials was evaluated using four frameworks: acceptability, demand, implementation, and adaptation.

Results: Of the 48 participants in the study, 32 completed the posttest and were included in the analysis (dropout rate: 33.3%). The difference between pretest and posttest scores was significantly higher in the intervention groups than the control group (2 vs. -1, p = .0191) and in Intervention Group 2 than the control group (2.0 vs. -0.5, p = .049). The feasibility frameworks for the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials were mostly positive.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The development of the J-BWAP and training nurses using e-learning were shown to be feasible in this study. The J-BWAP contents are appropriate for predicting the outcome of mechanical ventilation withdrawal. The J-BWAP has the potential to become a common tool among Japanese medical professionals after the contents are further simplified for daily application in clinical practice. Subsequent studies should verify the reliability and validity of this tool and test the real-world utility of the J-BWAP using randomized controlled trials in Japanese clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本版烧伤评估程序电子学习材料对重症监护室护士呼吸机停用的影响。
背景:目前日本还没有预测呼吸机退出成功率的评估工具。因此,需要一个可利用和有效的评估工具来解决这一问题。Burns Wean评估程序(BWAP)已被验证为呼吸机停用结果的可靠预测指标。然而,护士必须熟悉该工具,以确保其在临床环境中的有效利用。目的:本研究旨在检验日本重症监护室护士样本中26项日语版BWAP(J-BWAP)电子学习材料对呼吸机退出的影响。方法:将BWAP翻译成日语,检查并验证为J-BWAP。来自六家医院的非随机重症监护室护士被分为三组,包括干预组1(一节课内进行电子学习)、干预组2(一周内三节课内的电子学习)和对照组。参与者使用基于网络的模拟患者进行了前测和后测。主要的结果测量是两个干预组和对照组的在线前测和后测总分的差异。使用四个框架评估了J-BWAP及其电子学习材料的可行性:可接受性、需求、实施和适应。结果:48名参与者中,32人完成了后测并被纳入分析(辍学率:33.3%)。干预组的前测和后测得分之间的差异显著高于对照组(2 vs.-1,p=.0191),干预组2的差异显著低于对照组(2.0 vs.-0.5,p=.049)。J-BWAP及其电子学习材料的可行性框架主要是积极乐观的结论/对实践的启示:本研究表明,开发J-BWAP和使用电子学习培训护士是可行的。J-BWAP内容适用于预测机械通气退出的结果。J-BWAP的内容经过进一步简化,可在临床实践中日常应用,有可能成为日本医学专业人员的常用工具。后续研究应验证该工具的可靠性和有效性,并在日本临床环境中使用随机对照试验来测试J-BWAP在现实世界中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Management in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes: A Focused Ethnography Study. Exploring the Difficulties and Strategies of Family Caregivers in Caring for Patients With Dementia in Acute Care Wards. Correlation Among Workplace Burnout, Resilience, and Well-Being in Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Factors Associated With HIV-Related Stigma Among Indonesian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1