Association between biologically effective dose and local control after stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sarcoma.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Eashwar Somasundaram, Timothy D Smile, Ahmed Halima, James B Broughman, Chandana A Reddy, Shireen Parsai, Jacob G Scott, Chirag Shah, Timothy Chan, Shauna Campbell, Lilyana Angelov, Peter M Anderson, Stacy Zahler, Matteo Trucco, Stefanie M Thomas, Shavaughn Johnson, Nathan Mesko, Lukas Nystrom, Dale Shepard, George Thomas Budd, Peng Qi, Anthony Magnelli, Erin S Murphy
{"title":"Association between biologically effective dose and local control after stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sarcoma.","authors":"Eashwar Somasundaram,&nbsp;Timothy D Smile,&nbsp;Ahmed Halima,&nbsp;James B Broughman,&nbsp;Chandana A Reddy,&nbsp;Shireen Parsai,&nbsp;Jacob G Scott,&nbsp;Chirag Shah,&nbsp;Timothy Chan,&nbsp;Shauna Campbell,&nbsp;Lilyana Angelov,&nbsp;Peter M Anderson,&nbsp;Stacy Zahler,&nbsp;Matteo Trucco,&nbsp;Stefanie M Thomas,&nbsp;Shavaughn Johnson,&nbsp;Nathan Mesko,&nbsp;Lukas Nystrom,&nbsp;Dale Shepard,&nbsp;George Thomas Budd,&nbsp;Peng Qi,&nbsp;Anthony Magnelli,&nbsp;Erin S Murphy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for patients with recurrent and metastatic sarcoma. SBRT affords the potential to overcome the relative radioresistance of sarcomas through delivery of a focused high biological effective dose (BED) as an alternative to invasive surgery. We report local control outcomes after metastatic sarcoma SBRT based on radiation dose and histology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From our IRB-approved single-institution registry, all patients treated with SBRT for metastatic sarcoma between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate local control and overall survival at 1 and 2 years. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine optimal BED using an α/β ratio of 3. Local control was compared by SBRT dose using the BED cut point and evaluated by histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients with a total of 138 lesions met inclusion criteria. Median imaging follow up was 7.73 months (range 0.5-35.0). Patients were heavily pre-treated with systemic therapy. Median SBRT prescription was 116.70 Gy BED (range 66.70-419.30). Desmoplastic small round cell tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and small round blue cell sarcomas were classified as radiosensitive (<i>n</i> = 63), and all other histologies were classified as radioresistant (<i>n</i> = 75). Local control for all lesions was 66.7% (95% CI, 56.6-78.5) at 1 year and 50.2% (95% CI, 38.2-66.1) at 2 years. Stratifying by histology, 1- and 2-year local control rates were 65.3% and 55.0%, respectively, for radiosensitive, and 68.6% and 44.5%, respectively, for radioresistant histologies (<i>p</i> = 0.49). The ROC cut point for BED was 95 Gy. Local control rates at 1- and 2-years were 75% and 61.6%, respectively, for lesions receiving >95 Gy BED, and 46.2% and 0%, respectively, for lesions receiving <95 Gy BED (<i>p</i> = 0.01). On subgroup analysis, local control by BED > 95 Gy was significant for radiosensitive histologies (p = 0.013), and trended toward significance for radioresistant histologies (<i>p</i> = 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a significant local control benefit for sarcoma SBRT when a BED > 95 Gy is used. Further investigation into the dose-response relationship is warranted to maximize the therapeutic index.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"8 4","pages":"265-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322177/pdf/rsbrt-8-265.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for patients with recurrent and metastatic sarcoma. SBRT affords the potential to overcome the relative radioresistance of sarcomas through delivery of a focused high biological effective dose (BED) as an alternative to invasive surgery. We report local control outcomes after metastatic sarcoma SBRT based on radiation dose and histology.

Methods: From our IRB-approved single-institution registry, all patients treated with SBRT for metastatic sarcoma between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate local control and overall survival at 1 and 2 years. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine optimal BED using an α/β ratio of 3. Local control was compared by SBRT dose using the BED cut point and evaluated by histology.

Results: Forty-two patients with a total of 138 lesions met inclusion criteria. Median imaging follow up was 7.73 months (range 0.5-35.0). Patients were heavily pre-treated with systemic therapy. Median SBRT prescription was 116.70 Gy BED (range 66.70-419.30). Desmoplastic small round cell tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and small round blue cell sarcomas were classified as radiosensitive (n = 63), and all other histologies were classified as radioresistant (n = 75). Local control for all lesions was 66.7% (95% CI, 56.6-78.5) at 1 year and 50.2% (95% CI, 38.2-66.1) at 2 years. Stratifying by histology, 1- and 2-year local control rates were 65.3% and 55.0%, respectively, for radiosensitive, and 68.6% and 44.5%, respectively, for radioresistant histologies (p = 0.49). The ROC cut point for BED was 95 Gy. Local control rates at 1- and 2-years were 75% and 61.6%, respectively, for lesions receiving >95 Gy BED, and 46.2% and 0%, respectively, for lesions receiving <95 Gy BED (p = 0.01). On subgroup analysis, local control by BED > 95 Gy was significant for radiosensitive histologies (p = 0.013), and trended toward significance for radioresistant histologies (p = 0.25).

Conclusion: There is a significant local control benefit for sarcoma SBRT when a BED > 95 Gy is used. Further investigation into the dose-response relationship is warranted to maximize the therapeutic index.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性肉瘤立体定向放疗后生物有效剂量与局部控制的关系。
立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)越来越多地用于复发和转移性肉瘤患者。SBRT通过集中高生物有效剂量(BED)作为侵入性手术的替代方案,提供了克服肉瘤相对放射耐药的潜力。我们根据放射剂量和组织学报告转移性肉瘤SBRT后的局部控制结果。方法:从我们的irb批准的单机构注册表中,确定了2014年至2020年间接受SBRT治疗转移性肉瘤的所有患者。Kaplan-Meier分析用于估计1年和2年的局部控制和总生存率。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以α/β比为3确定最佳BED。局部对照采用BED切点SBRT剂量进行比较,并用组织学进行评价。结果:42例患者共138个病灶符合纳入标准。中位影像学随访时间为7.73个月(0.5 ~ 35.0个月)。患者接受了大量的全身治疗。SBRT处方中位数为116.70 Gy / BED(范围66.70-419.30)。结缔组织增生小圆细胞瘤、尤文氏肉瘤、横纹肌肉瘤和小圆蓝细胞肉瘤被归为放射敏感(n = 63),其他所有组织学被归为放射耐药(n = 75)。1年时所有病变的局部控制率为66.7% (95% CI, 56.6-78.5), 2年时为50.2% (95% CI, 38.2-66.1)。按组织学分层,放射敏感的1年和2年局部控制率分别为65.3%和55.0%,放射耐药的1年和2年局部控制率分别为68.6%和44.5% (p = 0.49)。BED的ROC切点为95 Gy。>95 Gy BED组1年和2年的局部控制率分别为75%和61.6%,p = 0.01组分别为46.2%和0%。在亚组分析中,BED > 95 Gy的局部控制对放射敏感组织有显著意义(p = 0.013),对放射耐药组织有显著意义(p = 0.25)。结论:当BED > 95 Gy时,SBRT有明显的局部控制益处。进一步研究剂量-反应关系是必要的,以最大限度地提高治疗指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact. Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain. Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer. Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction. Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1