Evaluation of postoperative pain with new heat-treated rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium files: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_566_22
C T Valliappan, B Rahul, E Melvin Gabriel, I Anand Sherwood, James L Gutmann, Bennett Tochukwu Amaechi, Omar Farooq Burhanuddin Mohammed
{"title":"Evaluation of postoperative pain with new heat-treated rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium files: A randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"C T Valliappan,&nbsp;B Rahul,&nbsp;E Melvin Gabriel,&nbsp;I Anand Sherwood,&nbsp;James L Gutmann,&nbsp;Bennett Tochukwu Amaechi,&nbsp;Omar Farooq Burhanuddin Mohammed","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_566_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A special heat-treated endodontic file (TruNatomy) was recently introduced with the claim of superior flexibility to enhance dentin preservation. The aim of the present study was to assess postoperative pain in single-visit root canal treatment with this newly introduced file, comparing it with other contemporary reciprocating and rotary file systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred seventy patients with acute irreversible pulpitis in maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to four experimental file systems: TruNatomy, HyFlex EDM, EdgeFile, and ProTaper Gold. Pre- and postoperative pain scores were assessed with 10-point visual analog scale. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TruNatomy file system had significantly the highest postoperative pain incidence (53.8%), while the EdgeFile system had significantly the least postoperative pain incidence (24%) and 24-h pain score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that the reciprocating multiple-file system, EdgeFile, had significantly reduced postoperative pain incidence compared to other heat-treated rotary nickel-titanium file systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 2","pages":"170-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_566_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A special heat-treated endodontic file (TruNatomy) was recently introduced with the claim of superior flexibility to enhance dentin preservation. The aim of the present study was to assess postoperative pain in single-visit root canal treatment with this newly introduced file, comparing it with other contemporary reciprocating and rotary file systems.

Materials and methods: One hundred seventy patients with acute irreversible pulpitis in maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to four experimental file systems: TruNatomy, HyFlex EDM, EdgeFile, and ProTaper Gold. Pre- and postoperative pain scores were assessed with 10-point visual analog scale. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: TruNatomy file system had significantly the highest postoperative pain incidence (53.8%), while the EdgeFile system had significantly the least postoperative pain incidence (24%) and 24-h pain score.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the reciprocating multiple-file system, EdgeFile, had significantly reduced postoperative pain incidence compared to other heat-treated rotary nickel-titanium file systems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型热处理旋转和往复式镍钛锉对术后疼痛的评估:一项随机对照临床试验。
简介:最近推出了一种特殊的热处理牙髓锉(TruNatomy),声称其具有优异的柔韧性,可以增强牙本质的保存。本研究的目的是评估这种新引入的锉刀单次根管治疗的术后疼痛,并将其与其他当代往复式和旋转锉系统进行比较。材料和方法:将170例上颌前磨牙急性不可逆牙髓炎患者随机分为四个实验文件系统:TruNatomy、HyFlex EDM、EdgeFile和ProTaper Gold。采用10分视觉模拟量表评估术前和术后疼痛评分。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行统计分析。结果:TruNatomy文件系统的术后疼痛发生率最高(53.8%),而EdgeFile系统的术前疼痛发生率和24小时疼痛评分最低(24%)。结论:本研究表明,与其他热处理的旋转镍钛锉系统相比,往复式多锉系统EdgeFile显著降低了术后疼痛发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Adding Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the Porosity of Calcium Hydroxide Determination of gamma radiation sterilization dose on bioceramic BCP-Sr-Ag as bone graft according to ISO 11137 standards Compressive strength of nanohybrid composite resin after the application of glycerin immersed in fermented milk Differences in the solubility of CaCO3 from blood clam shells and Ca(OH)2 as a candidate pulp capping material Effective Dose of Nano Propolis as Anti-Pain in Animal Models of Mus Musculus Using Writhing Test Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1