Men's Use of Economic Coercion Against Women in Rural Bangladesh.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Psychology of Violence Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1037/vio0000417
Emily C Dore, Monique Hennink, Ruchira Tabassum Naved, Stephanie Spaid Miedema, Aloka Talukder, Alison Hoover, Kathryn M Yount
{"title":"Men's Use of Economic Coercion Against Women in Rural Bangladesh.","authors":"Emily C Dore,&nbsp;Monique Hennink,&nbsp;Ruchira Tabassum Naved,&nbsp;Stephanie Spaid Miedema,&nbsp;Aloka Talukder,&nbsp;Alison Hoover,&nbsp;Kathryn M Yount","doi":"10.1037/vio0000417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bangladesh is historically a patriarchal society, but has made recent strides in increasing educational and economic opportunities for women. Yet men continue to perpetrate economic coercion and other forms of intimate partner violence against women in Bangladesh. This study examines how men in rural Bangladesh shape the economic activities of their wives within the context of changing norms around women's involvement in economic domains. Men's perspectives are not often explored in the literature and can provide valuable insight into how and why economic coercion persists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>25 in-depth interviews were conducted with men in rural Bangladesh and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men engaged in economically coercive practices, both implicitly and explicitly. Three themes captured how men perpetrated economic coercion: they held gendered expectations about how and if women should participate in economic activities, they monitored women's activities to ensure they conformed to the men's gendered expectations, and they placed explicit restrictions on women's economic activities to align with and maintain gender inequitable norms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings call attention to how men continue to see themselves as dominant over women in rural Bangladesh, despite the progress made in expanding educational and economic opportunities for women. The analysis points to the need for interventions that go beyond increased access to educational and economic programs for women to address the persistence of gender inequitable norms within patriarchal societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47876,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Violence","volume":"12 3","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194999/pdf/nihms-1898177.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Bangladesh is historically a patriarchal society, but has made recent strides in increasing educational and economic opportunities for women. Yet men continue to perpetrate economic coercion and other forms of intimate partner violence against women in Bangladesh. This study examines how men in rural Bangladesh shape the economic activities of their wives within the context of changing norms around women's involvement in economic domains. Men's perspectives are not often explored in the literature and can provide valuable insight into how and why economic coercion persists.

Method: 25 in-depth interviews were conducted with men in rural Bangladesh and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Men engaged in economically coercive practices, both implicitly and explicitly. Three themes captured how men perpetrated economic coercion: they held gendered expectations about how and if women should participate in economic activities, they monitored women's activities to ensure they conformed to the men's gendered expectations, and they placed explicit restrictions on women's economic activities to align with and maintain gender inequitable norms.

Conclusion: These findings call attention to how men continue to see themselves as dominant over women in rural Bangladesh, despite the progress made in expanding educational and economic opportunities for women. The analysis points to the need for interventions that go beyond increased access to educational and economic programs for women to address the persistence of gender inequitable norms within patriarchal societies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国农村男性对女性的经济胁迫。
目标:孟加拉国历史上是一个父权社会,但最近在增加妇女的教育和经济机会方面取得了进展。然而,在孟加拉国,男子继续对妇女实施经济胁迫和其他形式的亲密伴侣暴力。本研究考察了孟加拉国农村地区的男性如何在妇女参与经济领域的规范不断变化的背景下影响其妻子的经济活动。男性的观点在文献中很少被探讨,但可以为经济胁迫如何以及为什么会持续提供有价值的见解。方法:对孟加拉国农村男性进行25次深度访谈,并采用主题分析法进行分析。结果:男性参与了经济胁迫行为,包括显性和隐性。三个主题反映了男性如何实施经济胁迫:他们对女性如何以及是否应该参与经济活动抱有性别期望;他们监测女性的活动,以确保她们符合男性的性别期望;他们对女性的经济活动施加明确的限制,以符合并维持性别不平等的规范。结论:这些发现提醒人们注意,尽管在扩大妇女的教育和经济机会方面取得了进展,但在孟加拉国农村,男性仍然认为自己比女性占优势。分析指出,除了增加妇女获得教育和经济项目的机会之外,还需要采取干预措施,以解决男权社会中持续存在的性别不平等规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
The association between dating violence victimization and the well-being of young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Supplemental Material for Multiple Group Identities and Support for Violent Radicalization Among College and University Students: Challenge or Opportunity? Supplemental Material for Estimating the Association Between Spanking and Early Childhood Development Using Between- and Within-Child Analyses Attitudes justifying partner violence against women in Latin-American and Caribbean countries: A measurement invariance study. Making the world a more hostile place: Honor endorsement and the hostile attribution bias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1