Controlled Trial of a Short-term Intensive Parent Training Program within the Context of Routine Services for Autistic Children in China.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychosocial Intervention Pub Date : 2022-05-13 eCollection Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5093/pi2022a9
Zuyi Fang, Jamie M Lachman, Dongping Qiao, Jane Barlow
{"title":"Controlled Trial of a Short-term Intensive Parent Training Program within the Context of Routine Services for Autistic Children in China.","authors":"Zuyi Fang, Jamie M Lachman, Dongping Qiao, Jane Barlow","doi":"10.5093/pi2022a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent systematic reviews found limited rigorous research conducted to date of the effectiveness of parent training programs in reducing behavioral problems for autistic children in low- and middle-income countries. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a short-term intensive parent training program for autistic children aged three to six in the context of routine service provision in China. A quasi-experiment was conducted involving the local implementing organization and using a waitlist control. Data were collected at baseline and immediate post-intervention. The primary outcome was child behavioral problems measured using the Child Behavior Checklist Externalizing scale. Between-group comparisons used a difference-in-differences design with propensity score weighting to reduce sources of bias. A process evaluation was undertaken in parallel to assess participant involvement, program acceptability, and delivery. The protocol was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04257331). The final sample size was 111 (treatment: 63; comparison: 48). Results suggest that the program was associated with improvements in child externalizing behaviors (<i>b</i> = -2.71, 95% CI [-5.23, -0.18]), parental mental health symptoms (<i>b</i> = -5.96, 95% CI [-11.74, -0.17]), over-reactive parenting (<i>b</i> = -0.63, 95% CI [-0.98, -0.27]), and parental knowledge (<i>b</i> = 2.08, 95% CI [2.07, 2.17]). Exploratory analysis of factors related to implementation indicated that baseline parental mental health was related to participant engagement, and that satisfaction and engagement levels were potentially linked to positive treatment effects. Findings suggest that short-term intensive parent training programs that are provided by trained non-specialists, could potentially be used as an alternative to traditional prohibitively costly services that are delivered intensively for consecutive years in low-resource contexts. Follow-ups are needed to investigate its long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":51641,"journal":{"name":"Psychosocial Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/db/1132-0559-pi-31-2-0121.PMC10268554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosocial Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2022a9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent systematic reviews found limited rigorous research conducted to date of the effectiveness of parent training programs in reducing behavioral problems for autistic children in low- and middle-income countries. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a short-term intensive parent training program for autistic children aged three to six in the context of routine service provision in China. A quasi-experiment was conducted involving the local implementing organization and using a waitlist control. Data were collected at baseline and immediate post-intervention. The primary outcome was child behavioral problems measured using the Child Behavior Checklist Externalizing scale. Between-group comparisons used a difference-in-differences design with propensity score weighting to reduce sources of bias. A process evaluation was undertaken in parallel to assess participant involvement, program acceptability, and delivery. The protocol was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04257331). The final sample size was 111 (treatment: 63; comparison: 48). Results suggest that the program was associated with improvements in child externalizing behaviors (b = -2.71, 95% CI [-5.23, -0.18]), parental mental health symptoms (b = -5.96, 95% CI [-11.74, -0.17]), over-reactive parenting (b = -0.63, 95% CI [-0.98, -0.27]), and parental knowledge (b = 2.08, 95% CI [2.07, 2.17]). Exploratory analysis of factors related to implementation indicated that baseline parental mental health was related to participant engagement, and that satisfaction and engagement levels were potentially linked to positive treatment effects. Findings suggest that short-term intensive parent training programs that are provided by trained non-specialists, could potentially be used as an alternative to traditional prohibitively costly services that are delivered intensively for consecutive years in low-resource contexts. Follow-ups are needed to investigate its long-term benefits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国自闭症儿童常规服务背景下的短期强化家长培训项目对照试验》(Controlled Trial of a Short-term Intensive Parent Training Program within the Context of Routine Services for Autistic Children in China)。
近期的系统性综述发现,迄今为止,在中低收入国家开展的关于家长培训项目在减少自闭症儿童行为问题方面的有效性的严格研究十分有限。本研究旨在评估针对中国三至六岁自闭症儿童的短期强化家长培训项目在提供常规服务方面的有效性。在当地实施机构的参与下,采用候补对照的方式进行了准实验。在基线和干预后立即收集数据。主要结果是使用儿童行为检查表外化量表测量的儿童行为问题。组间比较采用了倾向得分加权的差异设计,以减少偏差来源。同时还进行了一项过程评估,以评估参与者的参与度、项目的可接受性以及项目的实施情况。该方案已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了前瞻性注册(NCT04257331)。最终样本量为 111 个(治疗:63 个;对比:48 个)。结果表明,该计划与儿童外化行为(b = -2.71,95% CI [-5.23,-0.18])、父母心理健康症状(b = -5.96,95% CI [-11.74,-0.17])、父母过度反应(b = -0.63,95% CI [-0.98,-0.27])和父母知识(b = 2.08,95% CI [2.07,2.17])的改善相关。对实施相关因素的探索性分析表明,家长的心理健康基线与参与者的参与度有关,满意度和参与度水平与积极的治疗效果有潜在联系。研究结果表明,由训练有素的非专业人员提供的短期强化家长培训项目有可能被用来替代在资源匮乏的情况下连续数年提供的成本过高的传统服务。需要进行后续跟踪,以研究其长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychosocial Intervention
Psychosocial Intervention PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychosocial Intervention is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes papers in all areas relevant to psychosocial intervention at the individual, family, social networks, organization, community, and population levels. The Journal emphasizes an evidence-based perspective and welcomes papers reporting original basic and applied research, program evaluation, and intervention results. The journal will also feature integrative reviews, and specialized papers on theoretical advances and methodological issues. Psychosocial Intervention is committed to advance knowledge, and to provide scientific evidence informing psychosocial interventions tackling social and community problems, and promoting social welfare and quality of life. Psychosocial Intervention welcomes contributions from all areas of psychology and allied disciplines, such as sociology, social work, social epidemiology, and public health. Psychosocial Intervention aims to be international in scope, and will publish papers both in Spanish and English.
期刊最新文献
Which Psychosocial Strengths Could Combat the Adolescent Suicide Spectrum? Dissecting the Covitality Model. A Controlled Evaluation of a Psychosocial Outreach Support Program for Adults with Severe Mental Illness. Care Competencies Training Enhances Adolescents' Well-being: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Integrated Motivational Strategies for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators with Substance Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Understanding the Effect of Loneliness on Quality of Life in Older Adults from Longitudinal Approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1