How has COVID-19 changed healthcare professionals' attitudes to self-care? A mixed methods research study.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0289067
Peter Samuel Smith, Aos Alaa, Eva Riboli Sasco, Emmanouil Bagkeris, Austen El-Osta
{"title":"How has COVID-19 changed healthcare professionals' attitudes to self-care? A mixed methods research study.","authors":"Peter Samuel Smith,&nbsp;Aos Alaa,&nbsp;Eva Riboli Sasco,&nbsp;Emmanouil Bagkeris,&nbsp;Austen El-Osta","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0289067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed the way services are delivered. Self-care, including good hygiene practices and avoidance of risk was emphasised as the key measure to tackle the pandemic in the early stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how self-reported professional attitudes, perceptions and practices of self-care have changed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured qualitative interview.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Health care.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>304 healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A wide range of HCPs, including pharmacists, nurses, doctors, social prescribers and other designations took part in a 27-item anonymous online survey. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with nine healthcare professionals explored attitudes to and practices of self-care before and during the pandemic. Views were sought on the permanence and implications of changes. Data were analysed using routine statistics and thematic analysis to identify major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 304 HCPs responded to the survey fully. Nine participated in a semi-structured interview. There was agreement that the importance of self-care has increased markedly during the pandemic. The percentage of respondents who felt that self-care was 'very' important to their clients increased from 54.3% to 86.6% since the pandemic. Personal empowerment and capacity of service users to self-care increased significantly during the pandemic. Willingness of patients to engage (74%) and poor understanding of self-care (71%) were cited as the two main barriers to self-care. A close third was digital exclusion (71%), though 86% of respondents recommended online resources and 77% the use of smartphone apps. Survey respondents believed the changes to be permanent and positive. Interviewees reported a major, and positive move to self-care with the pandemic seen as an opportunity to be grasped, but professional education would have to be aligned to make the most of it. They raised concerns as to whether the shift to self-care was perceived by users as 'abandonment' rather than 'empowerment' and whether problems had been stored rather than dealt with through self-care and therefore whether the positive changes would continue after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reporting their views before the pandemic, barely more than half of the professionals surveyed saw self-care as fundamentally important to the individuals they served. This changed to 86% as a result of the pandemic. Patient/client engagement with and understanding of self-care were reported as major barriers, as was digital exclusion, though increased technological solutions were used by all respondents. Concerns were raised that the permanence of the changes depended upon continued encouragement and empowerment of individuals to self-care and on its inclusion in professional education as a substantive subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"18 7","pages":"e0289067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed the way services are delivered. Self-care, including good hygiene practices and avoidance of risk was emphasised as the key measure to tackle the pandemic in the early stages.

Objective: To understand how self-reported professional attitudes, perceptions and practices of self-care have changed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured qualitative interview.

Setting: Health care.

Participants: 304 healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Methods: A wide range of HCPs, including pharmacists, nurses, doctors, social prescribers and other designations took part in a 27-item anonymous online survey. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with nine healthcare professionals explored attitudes to and practices of self-care before and during the pandemic. Views were sought on the permanence and implications of changes. Data were analysed using routine statistics and thematic analysis to identify major themes.

Results: A total of 304 HCPs responded to the survey fully. Nine participated in a semi-structured interview. There was agreement that the importance of self-care has increased markedly during the pandemic. The percentage of respondents who felt that self-care was 'very' important to their clients increased from 54.3% to 86.6% since the pandemic. Personal empowerment and capacity of service users to self-care increased significantly during the pandemic. Willingness of patients to engage (74%) and poor understanding of self-care (71%) were cited as the two main barriers to self-care. A close third was digital exclusion (71%), though 86% of respondents recommended online resources and 77% the use of smartphone apps. Survey respondents believed the changes to be permanent and positive. Interviewees reported a major, and positive move to self-care with the pandemic seen as an opportunity to be grasped, but professional education would have to be aligned to make the most of it. They raised concerns as to whether the shift to self-care was perceived by users as 'abandonment' rather than 'empowerment' and whether problems had been stored rather than dealt with through self-care and therefore whether the positive changes would continue after the pandemic.

Conclusion: Reporting their views before the pandemic, barely more than half of the professionals surveyed saw self-care as fundamentally important to the individuals they served. This changed to 86% as a result of the pandemic. Patient/client engagement with and understanding of self-care were reported as major barriers, as was digital exclusion, though increased technological solutions were used by all respondents. Concerns were raised that the permanence of the changes depended upon continued encouragement and empowerment of individuals to self-care and on its inclusion in professional education as a substantive subject.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19如何改变医疗保健专业人员对自我保健的态度?一种混合方法的研究。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行从根本上改变了提供服务的方式。自我保健,包括良好的卫生习惯和避免风险,被强调为在早期阶段应对大流行病的关键措施。目的:了解COVID-19大流行对自我报告的职业态度、认知和自我保健实践的影响。设计:横断面在线调查和半结构化定性访谈。环境:医疗保健。参与者:304名医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)。方法:对包括药师、护士、医生、社会开处方者和其他指定人员在内的广大医护人员进行27项匿名在线调查。与9名卫生保健专业人员进行的半结构化定性访谈探讨了在大流行之前和期间对自我保健的态度和做法。人们就变化的持久性和所涉问题征求了意见。使用常规统计和专题分析来分析数据,以确定主要主题。结果:304名医护人员全面回复了调查。其中9人参加了半结构化的面试。人们一致认为,在大流行期间,自我保健的重要性显著增加。自疫情以来,认为自我保健对客户“非常”重要的受访者比例从54.3%上升到86.6%。在大流行期间,个人赋权和服务使用者自我保健的能力大大提高。患者参与意愿(74%)和对自我保健了解不足(71%)被认为是自我保健的两个主要障碍。紧随其后的是数字排斥(71%),尽管86%的受访者建议使用在线资源,77%的受访者建议使用智能手机应用程序。受访者认为这些变化是永久性和积极的。受访者报告说,在大流行的情况下,自我保健的重大积极举措被视为一个可以抓住的机会,但必须协调专业教育,以充分利用这一机会。他们对用户是否认为向自我保健的转变是"放弃"而不是"赋予权力"表示关切,对问题是否被储存而不是通过自我保健来解决,以及因此在大流行之后是否会继续出现积极的变化表示关切。结论:在大流行之前报告他们的观点时,接受调查的专业人员中,略多于一半的人认为自我保健对他们所服务的个人至关重要。由于大流行,这一比例变为86%。尽管所有受访者都使用了更多的技术解决方案,但据报告,患者/客户对自我护理的参与和理解是主要障碍,数字排斥也是主要障碍。有人表示关切的是,这些变化的持久性取决于继续鼓励和赋予个人自理能力,并取决于将其作为一项实质性课题纳入专业教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Trichoderma sp. AH pretreatment improves organic oxygen composites from supercritical alcoholysis of wheat straw. Trypanosomes lack a canonical EJC but possess an UPF1 dependent NMD-like pathway. A hemoperfusion column selectively adsorbs LAP+ lymphocytes to improve anti-tumor immunity and survival of tumor-bearing rats. A new method for detection of microbursts via point observation methods and field measurement for validation study with Doppler weather radar. Acceptability and feasibility of acceptance and commitment therapy for improving outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1