Analysis of risk factors for non-fusion of bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A clinical retrospective study

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.002
Wentao Zhuo , Fuming Huang , Weijia Zhu , Fuqiang Liu , Jun Liu , Dadi Jin
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for non-fusion of bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A clinical retrospective study","authors":"Wentao Zhuo ,&nbsp;Fuming Huang ,&nbsp;Weijia Zhu ,&nbsp;Fuqiang Liu ,&nbsp;Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Dadi Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Bone graft fusion is a major concern among surgeons after </span>Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery as non-fusion may lead to further physical and drug therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The related risk elements of non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF surgery were retrospectively assessed. Patients receiving ACDF operation in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the criteria, 107 study subjects were recruited with a total of 164 surgical segments. The general information of patients, bone graft materials, imaging parameters, and clinical efficacy was recorded. T-test, chi-square test and binary logistic regression<span> evaluation were employed to explore the risk factors of bone graft nonunion.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Low housefield unit (HU) value, diabetes, allogeneic bone, and hydroxyapatite<span> (HA) artificial bone could be risk factors for bone graft fusion in ACDF surgery. Further multivariate analysis was performed and confirmed those related factors of bone graft non-fusion including low HU value (non-fusion rate: 32.53% [27/83], OR = 5.024, </span></span><em>p</em> = 0.025), diabetes (non-fusion rate: 53.33% [8/15], OR = 4.776, <em>p</em> = 0.031), allogeneic bone (18.57% [13/70], OR = 3.964, <em>p</em> = 0.046), and artificial bone (68.29% [28/41], OR = 50.550, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>By looking at bone graft fusion, selecting autologous iliac bone is an ideal selection to avoid non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF. Diabetes was more important predictor of bone graft nonunion than low HU value. Larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to further confirm these findings in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823001902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bone graft fusion is a major concern among surgeons after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery as non-fusion may lead to further physical and drug therapies.

Methods

The related risk elements of non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF surgery were retrospectively assessed. Patients receiving ACDF operation in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the criteria, 107 study subjects were recruited with a total of 164 surgical segments. The general information of patients, bone graft materials, imaging parameters, and clinical efficacy was recorded. T-test, chi-square test and binary logistic regression evaluation were employed to explore the risk factors of bone graft nonunion.

Results

Low housefield unit (HU) value, diabetes, allogeneic bone, and hydroxyapatite (HA) artificial bone could be risk factors for bone graft fusion in ACDF surgery. Further multivariate analysis was performed and confirmed those related factors of bone graft non-fusion including low HU value (non-fusion rate: 32.53% [27/83], OR = 5.024, p = 0.025), diabetes (non-fusion rate: 53.33% [8/15], OR = 4.776, p = 0.031), allogeneic bone (18.57% [13/70], OR = 3.964, p = 0.046), and artificial bone (68.29% [28/41], OR = 50.550, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

By looking at bone graft fusion, selecting autologous iliac bone is an ideal selection to avoid non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF. Diabetes was more important predictor of bone graft nonunion than low HU value. Larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to further confirm these findings in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中植骨不融合的风险因素分析:一项临床回顾性研究。
背景:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)手术后,植骨融合是外科医生关注的一个主要问题,因为不融合可能导致进一步的物理和药物治疗:方法:对 ACDF 手术中植骨不融合的相关风险因素进行回顾性评估。回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月在我院接受ACDF手术的患者。根据标准,共纳入 107 例研究对象,共计 164 个手术节段。记录患者的一般信息、植骨材料、影像学参数和临床疗效。采用T检验、卡方检验和二元逻辑回归评估来探讨植骨不愈合的风险因素:结果:低housefield单位(HU)值、糖尿病、同种异体骨和羟基磷灰石(HA)人工骨可能是ACDF手术中骨移植融合的风险因素。进一步的多变量分析证实,与植骨不融合相关的因素包括低 HU 值(不融合率:32.53% [27/83],OR = 5.024,P = 0.025)、糖尿病(非融合率:53.33%[8/15],OR = 4.776,P = 0.031)、异体骨(18.57%[13/70],OR = 3.964,P = 0.046)和人工骨(68.29%[28/41],OR = 50.550,P 结论:通过观察植骨融合情况,选择自体髂骨是避免 ACDF 中植骨不融合的理想选择。与低HU值相比,糖尿病是导致植骨不融合的更重要的预测因素。未来需要更大的样本量和更长时间的随访来进一步证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Assessing subscapularis tears: Relationship between special tests and pain & tear severity. Analysis of orthopedic surgery-related incidents in operating rooms using a nationwide incident reporting database. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the kinesiophobia causes scale: A descriptive survey have undergone total knee arthroplasty in China. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer versus open complete repair for symptomatic massive rotator cuff tear. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 and SF-36 instruments in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1