Low back pain, ultrasonographic muscle thickness measurements and biopsychosocial factors at different trimesters of pregnancy

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.006
Esra Üzelpasaci , Levent Özçakar , Serap Özgül , Ceren Gürşen , Türkan Akbayrak
{"title":"Low back pain, ultrasonographic muscle thickness measurements and biopsychosocial factors at different trimesters of pregnancy","authors":"Esra Üzelpasaci ,&nbsp;Levent Özçakar ,&nbsp;Serap Özgül ,&nbsp;Ceren Gürşen ,&nbsp;Türkan Akbayrak","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pregnancy-related low back pain is a multifactorial problem and its assosiation with pain intensity and biopsycosocial factors can not be fully explained. This study aimed to determine the psychosocial as well as biological/physical risk factors associated with self-reported low back pain (LBP) intensity during different trimesters of pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This cross-sectional study comprised 107 pregnant women. An introductory information form for physical and medical characteristics, Visual Analog Scale<span> (VAS) for low back pain intensity and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for degree of loss of functionality, Short Form-36 (SF-36) for </span></span>quality of life<span> and Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) for physical activity were applied. Abdominal muscle thicknesses and diastasis recti<span> were measured by ultrasonography. Univariate regression was used to analyse associations between each plausible independent variable and low back pain intensity.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean LBP intensity during 1st, 2nd ve 3rd trimesters were 26.8 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 20.9, 27.3 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 19.8, 21.6 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span><span> 20.1 mm, respectively. ODI scores were associated with LBP intensity, explaining 11%, 13% and 26% of LBP severity during the 1st, 2nd ve 3rd trimesters, respectively. Other biological/physical variables like age, body mass index<span>, muscle thickness and diastasis recti were not associated with pain intensity. SF-36 emotional role limitation (coef = −0.03, R2 = 0.20, p = 0.01) in the 3rd trimester and SF-36 pain score in the 1st (coef = −0.04, R2 = 0.12, p = 0.02) and 3rd (coef = −0.05, R2 = 0.26, p = 0.004) trimesters and PPAQ-sedentary was associated during the 2nd trimester (coef = 0.17, R2 = 0.17, p = 0.02) with pain intensity.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ODI scores were associated with LBP intensity in all three trimesters, with SF-36 pain domain in the 1st and 3rd trimesters, with SF-36 emotional role limitation only in the 3rd trimester and with sedentary activity level only in the 2nd trimester. İncreased pain intensity was surprisingly associated with a small number of biopsychosocial factors in all the trimesters. There is need for further large-sample studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823001951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy-related low back pain is a multifactorial problem and its assosiation with pain intensity and biopsycosocial factors can not be fully explained. This study aimed to determine the psychosocial as well as biological/physical risk factors associated with self-reported low back pain (LBP) intensity during different trimesters of pregnancy.

Methods

This cross-sectional study comprised 107 pregnant women. An introductory information form for physical and medical characteristics, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain intensity and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for degree of loss of functionality, Short Form-36 (SF-36) for quality of life and Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) for physical activity were applied. Abdominal muscle thicknesses and diastasis recti were measured by ultrasonography. Univariate regression was used to analyse associations between each plausible independent variable and low back pain intensity.

Results

Mean LBP intensity during 1st, 2nd ve 3rd trimesters were 26.8 ± 20.9, 27.3 ± 19.8, 21.6 ± 20.1 mm, respectively. ODI scores were associated with LBP intensity, explaining 11%, 13% and 26% of LBP severity during the 1st, 2nd ve 3rd trimesters, respectively. Other biological/physical variables like age, body mass index, muscle thickness and diastasis recti were not associated with pain intensity. SF-36 emotional role limitation (coef = −0.03, R2 = 0.20, p = 0.01) in the 3rd trimester and SF-36 pain score in the 1st (coef = −0.04, R2 = 0.12, p = 0.02) and 3rd (coef = −0.05, R2 = 0.26, p = 0.004) trimesters and PPAQ-sedentary was associated during the 2nd trimester (coef = 0.17, R2 = 0.17, p = 0.02) with pain intensity.

Conclusion

ODI scores were associated with LBP intensity in all three trimesters, with SF-36 pain domain in the 1st and 3rd trimesters, with SF-36 emotional role limitation only in the 3rd trimester and with sedentary activity level only in the 2nd trimester. İncreased pain intensity was surprisingly associated with a small number of biopsychosocial factors in all the trimesters. There is need for further large-sample studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同孕期的腰痛、超声波肌肉厚度测量和生物心理社会因素。
背景:与妊娠相关的腰背痛是一个多因素的问题,其与疼痛强度和活组织检查社会因素的关系还不能完全解释清楚。本研究旨在确定与妊娠不同孕期自述腰背痛(LBP)强度相关的社会心理以及生物/物理风险因素:这项横断面研究包括 107 名孕妇。方法:这项横断面研究由 107 名孕妇组成,采用了一份介绍身体和医疗特征的信息表、腰背痛强度视觉模拟量表(VAS)和功能丧失程度 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、生活质量简表-36(SF-36)和体力活动调查表(PPAQ)。腹部肌肉厚度和直肠膨出通过超声波进行测量。采用单变量回归法分析每个可能的自变量与腰背痛强度之间的关系:结果:第一、第二和第三孕期的平均腰背痛强度分别为(26.8 ± 20.9)、(27.3 ± 19.8)和(21.6 ± 20.1)毫米。ODI评分与枸杞痛强度相关,分别解释了第一、第二和第三孕期11%、13%和26%的枸杞痛严重程度。其他生物/物理变量,如年龄、体重指数、肌肉厚度和直肠膨出与疼痛强度无关。SF-36情感角色限制(系数=-0.03,R2=0.20,p=0.01)在第 3 个孕期与疼痛强度相关,SF-36 疼痛评分在第 1 个孕期(系数=-0.04,R2=0.12,p=0.02)和第 3 个孕期(系数=-0.05,R2=0.26,p=0.004)与疼痛强度相关,PPAQ-sedentary 在第 2 个孕期与疼痛强度相关(系数=0.17,R2=0.17,p=0.02):结论:ODI 评分在所有三个孕期都与枸杞痛强度相关,在第一和第三个孕期与 SF-36 疼痛域相关,仅在第三个孕期与 SF-36 情感角色限制相关,仅在第二个孕期与久坐活动水平相关。令人惊讶的是,疼痛强度的增加在所有三个孕期都与少数生物心理社会因素有关。有必要进行进一步的大样本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Assessing subscapularis tears: Relationship between special tests and pain & tear severity. Analysis of orthopedic surgery-related incidents in operating rooms using a nationwide incident reporting database. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the kinesiophobia causes scale: A descriptive survey have undergone total knee arthroplasty in China. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer versus open complete repair for symptomatic massive rotator cuff tear. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 and SF-36 instruments in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1