Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Between Single-Energy and Dual-Energy Images for the Brain With Stereotactic Frames on Dual-Energy Cerebral CT.

Frontiers in radiology Pub Date : 2022-06-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fradi.2022.899100
Xiaojing Zhao, Wang Chao, Yi Shan, Jingkai Li, Cheng Zhao, Miao Zhang, Jie Lu
{"title":"Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Between Single-Energy and Dual-Energy Images for the Brain With Stereotactic Frames on Dual-Energy Cerebral CT.","authors":"Xiaojing Zhao,&nbsp;Wang Chao,&nbsp;Yi Shan,&nbsp;Jingkai Li,&nbsp;Cheng Zhao,&nbsp;Miao Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Lu","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2022.899100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative stereotactic planning of deep brain stimulation (DBS) using computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is of clinical interest. However, frame-induced metal artifacts are common in clinical practice, which can be challenging for neurosurgeons to visualize brain structures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the image quality and radiation exposure of patients with stereotactic frame brain CT acquired using a dual-source CT (DSCT) system in single- and dual-energy modes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 60 consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and randomized them into two groups. CT images of the brain were performed using DSCT (Group A, an 80/Sn150 kVp dual-energy mode; Group B, a 120 kVp single-energy mode). One set of single-energy images (120 kVp) and 10 sets of virtual monochromatic images (50-140 keV) were obtained. Subjective image analysis of overall image quality was performed using a five-point Likert scale. For objective image quality evaluation, CT values, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were calculated. The radiation dose was recorded for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean effective radiation dose was reduced in the dual-energy mode (1.73 mSv ± 0.45 mSv) compared to the single-energy mode (3.16 mSv ± 0.64 mSv) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Image noise was reduced by 46-52% for 120-140 keV VMI compared to 120 kVp images (both <i>p</i> < 0.01). CT values were higher at 100-140 keV than at 120 kVp images. At 120-140 keV, CT values of brain tissue showed significant differences at the level of the most severe metal artifacts (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). SNR was also higher in the dual-energy mode 90-140 keV compared to 120 kVp images, showing a significant difference between the two groups at 120-140 keV (all <i>p</i> < 0.01). The CNR was significantly better in Group A for 60-140 keV VMI compared to Group B (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The highest subjective image scores were found in the 120 keV images, while 110-140 keV images had significantly higher scores than 120 kVp images (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DSCT images using dual-energy modes provide better objective and subjective image quality for patients with PD at lower radiation doses compared to single-energy modes and facilitate brain tissue visualization with stereotactic frame DBS procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"2 ","pages":"899100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.899100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative stereotactic planning of deep brain stimulation (DBS) using computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is of clinical interest. However, frame-induced metal artifacts are common in clinical practice, which can be challenging for neurosurgeons to visualize brain structures.

Objectives: To evaluate the image quality and radiation exposure of patients with stereotactic frame brain CT acquired using a dual-source CT (DSCT) system in single- and dual-energy modes.

Materials and methods: We included 60 consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and randomized them into two groups. CT images of the brain were performed using DSCT (Group A, an 80/Sn150 kVp dual-energy mode; Group B, a 120 kVp single-energy mode). One set of single-energy images (120 kVp) and 10 sets of virtual monochromatic images (50-140 keV) were obtained. Subjective image analysis of overall image quality was performed using a five-point Likert scale. For objective image quality evaluation, CT values, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were calculated. The radiation dose was recorded for each patient.

Results: The mean effective radiation dose was reduced in the dual-energy mode (1.73 mSv ± 0.45 mSv) compared to the single-energy mode (3.16 mSv ± 0.64 mSv) (p < 0.001). Image noise was reduced by 46-52% for 120-140 keV VMI compared to 120 kVp images (both p < 0.01). CT values were higher at 100-140 keV than at 120 kVp images. At 120-140 keV, CT values of brain tissue showed significant differences at the level of the most severe metal artifacts (all p < 0.05). SNR was also higher in the dual-energy mode 90-140 keV compared to 120 kVp images, showing a significant difference between the two groups at 120-140 keV (all p < 0.01). The CNR was significantly better in Group A for 60-140 keV VMI compared to Group B (both p < 0.001). The highest subjective image scores were found in the 120 keV images, while 110-140 keV images had significantly higher scores than 120 kVp images (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: DSCT images using dual-energy modes provide better objective and subjective image quality for patients with PD at lower radiation doses compared to single-energy modes and facilitate brain tissue visualization with stereotactic frame DBS procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双能脑CT立体定向帧单能和双能脑图像质量和辐射剂量的比较。
背景:应用计算机断层扫描(CT)成像对帕金森病(PD)患者进行术前立体定向脑深部刺激(DBS)计划具有临床意义。然而,框架诱导的金属伪影在临床实践中很常见,这对神经外科医生可视化大脑结构可能是一个挑战。目的:评价双源CT(DSCT)系统在单能和双能模式下获得的立体定向框架脑CT患者的图像质量和辐射暴露。材料和方法:我们纳入了60名连续的帕金森病患者,并将他们随机分为两组。使用DSCT进行大脑的CT图像(A组,80/Sn150kVp双能量模式;B组,120kVp单能量模式)。获得了一组单能量图像(120kVp)和10组虚拟单色图像(50-140keV)。使用五点Likert量表对整体图像质量进行主观图像分析。为了客观评估图像质量,计算了CT值、图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比度与噪声(CNR)。记录每位患者的辐射剂量。结果:与单能量模式(3.16mSv±0.64mSv)相比,双能量模式下的平均有效辐射剂量(1.73mSv±0.45mSv)降低了(p<0.001)。与120kVp图像相比,120-140keV VMI图像噪声降低了46-52%(均p<0.01)。100-140keV图像的CT值高于120kVp。在120-140keV时,脑组织的CT值在最严重的金属伪影水平上显示出显著差异(均p<0.05)。与120kVp图像相比,90-140keV双能量模式下的SNR也更高,在120-140keV时,两组之间存在显著差异(均p<0.01)。在60-140keV VMI时,a组的CNR明显优于B组(均<0.001)。120keV图像的主观图像得分最高,而110-140keV图像的得分明显高于120kVp图像(均p<0.05)。结论:与单能量模式相比,双能量模式的DSCT图像在较低辐射剂量下为PD患者提供了更好的客观和主观图像质量,并有助于立体定向框架DBS程序的脑组织可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language task-based fMRI analysis using machine learning and deep learning. Case Report: Diffuse cerebral lymphomatosis with superimposed multifocal primary CNS lymphoma. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the identification of renal parenchymal involvement in children with a first episode of febrile urinary tract infection. SenseCare: a research platform for medical image informatics and interactive 3D visualization. Editorial: Artificial intelligence and multimodal medical imaging data fusion for improving cardiovascular disease care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1