End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment For Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life : A Single Center Experience.

Sol Jin, Jehun Kim, Jin Young Lee, Taek Yong Ko, Gyu Man Oh
{"title":"End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment For Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life : A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Sol Jin,&nbsp;Jehun Kim,&nbsp;Jin Young Lee,&nbsp;Taek Yong Ko,&nbsp;Gyu Man Oh","doi":"10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life came into force in February 2018 in Korea. This study reviews the practices of end-of-life care for patients who withdrew or withheld lifesustaining treatment at a tertiary care hospital, addresses the limitations of the law, and discusses necessary steps to promote patient-centered self-determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who died after agreeing to withhold lifesustaining treatment in 2018 at our university hospital. The cause of death, the intensity of end-of-life care, and other characteristics were reviewed and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 334 patients, 231 (69%) died from cancer. The decision to stop life-sustaining treatment was made by family members for 178 patients overall (53.3%) and for 101 (43.7%) cancer patients, regardless of the patient's wishes. When the patient decided to stop lifesustaining treatment, the time from the authorization to withhold life-sustaining treatment to death was longer than when the decision was made by family members (28.7±41.3 vs 10.5±23.2 days, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In many cases, the decision to discontinue lifesustaining treatment was made by the family, not by the patient. In order to protect human dignity based on the patients' self-determination, it is necessary for patients to understand their disease based on careful explanations from physicians. Ongoing survey-based research will be necessary in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73194,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"23 2","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/7f/KJHPC-23-093.PMC10332712.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life came into force in February 2018 in Korea. This study reviews the practices of end-of-life care for patients who withdrew or withheld lifesustaining treatment at a tertiary care hospital, addresses the limitations of the law, and discusses necessary steps to promote patient-centered self-determination.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who died after agreeing to withhold lifesustaining treatment in 2018 at our university hospital. The cause of death, the intensity of end-of-life care, and other characteristics were reviewed and statistically analyzed.

Results: Of a total of 334 patients, 231 (69%) died from cancer. The decision to stop life-sustaining treatment was made by family members for 178 patients overall (53.3%) and for 101 (43.7%) cancer patients, regardless of the patient's wishes. When the patient decided to stop lifesustaining treatment, the time from the authorization to withhold life-sustaining treatment to death was longer than when the decision was made by family members (28.7±41.3 vs 10.5±23.2 days, P<0.001).

Conclusion: In many cases, the decision to discontinue lifesustaining treatment was made by the family, not by the patient. In order to protect human dignity based on the patients' self-determination, it is necessary for patients to understand their disease based on careful explanations from physicians. Ongoing survey-based research will be necessary in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临终关怀和姑息治疗或生命结束时实施关于维持生命治疗决定的法案后,临终病人的临终关怀实践:单一中心经验。
目的:《临终关怀和姑息治疗法》和《临终病人维持生命治疗决定法》于2018年2月在韩国生效。本研究回顾了在三级护理医院撤回或拒绝维持生命治疗的患者的临终关怀实践,解决了法律的局限性,并讨论了促进以患者为中心的自决的必要步骤。方法:回顾性分析2018年我校附属医院同意停止维持生命治疗后死亡的患者病历。对死亡原因、临终关怀强度和其他特征进行回顾和统计分析。结果:334例患者中,231例(69%)死于癌症。无论患者的意愿如何,共有178名患者(53.3%)和101名癌症患者(43.7%)的家庭成员决定停止维持生命的治疗。当患者决定停止维持生命治疗时,从授权停止维持生命治疗到死亡的时间比由家属决定的时间要长(28.7±41.3天vs 10.5±23.2天)。结论:在许多情况下,停止维持生命治疗的决定是由家属而不是患者决定的。为了在病人自我决定的基础上保护人的尊严,病人有必要在医生仔细解释的基础上了解自己的疾病。在未来,基于调查的持续研究将是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Personnel's Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Related to Providing Palliative Care in Persons with Chronic Diseases. Relationships among Perceptions of Dying Well, Attitudes toward Advance Directives, and Preferences for Advance Directives among Elderly Living Alone. Attitudes towards Death, Perceptions of Hospice Care, and Hospice Care Needs among Family Members of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. The Art Therapy Experiences of Patients and Their Family Members in Hospice Palliative Care. Barriers to Early Palliative Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1