Pharmacist Involvement in an Acute Care of the Elderly Team: Impact on Appropriate Medication Use.

Q2 Medicine Senior Care Pharmacist Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2023.338
Jaylan M Yuksel, Kelly R Ulen, Dona Varghese, John Noviasky
{"title":"Pharmacist Involvement in an Acute Care of the Elderly Team: Impact on Appropriate Medication Use.","authors":"Jaylan M Yuksel,&nbsp;Kelly R Ulen,&nbsp;Dona Varghese,&nbsp;John Noviasky","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Currently, our institution does not have a full-time pharmacist rounding with the inpatient acute care of the elderly (ACE) team daily. We sought to evaluate the involvement of a clinical pharmacy service within the ACE team and its impact on appropriate medication use. <b>Objective</b> The primary outcome was the number of drug-related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) detected by the pharmacist compared with no pharmacist on the ACE team. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, 30-day re-hospitalization, and accepted DRPs and PIMs recommendations made by the pharmacist. <b>Methods</b> This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. The control cohort consisted of patients seen over 3 months when no pharmacist was present. The intervention cohort comprised patients seen over 3 months when a pharmacist was present on the ACE team. Patients were excluded if there was not a documented chart note from a geriatric provider or pharmacist. <b>Results</b> A total of 125 patients were included in the intervention group and 106 patients in the control group. Regarding the primary outcome, the control cohort had significantly fewer identified PIMs and DRPs in comparison with the intervention cohort (<i>P</i> < 0.001; <i>P</i> < 0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference in length of stay (<i>P</i> = 0.317). There was a statistical difference between groups regarding 30-day readmission rates (<i>P</i> = 0.007). <b>Conclusion</b> Our study shows that the inclusion of a pharmacist on the ACE team was associated with more DRPs, and PIMs identified, creating a positive impact on patient care and 30-day readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2023.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Currently, our institution does not have a full-time pharmacist rounding with the inpatient acute care of the elderly (ACE) team daily. We sought to evaluate the involvement of a clinical pharmacy service within the ACE team and its impact on appropriate medication use. Objective The primary outcome was the number of drug-related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) detected by the pharmacist compared with no pharmacist on the ACE team. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, 30-day re-hospitalization, and accepted DRPs and PIMs recommendations made by the pharmacist. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. The control cohort consisted of patients seen over 3 months when no pharmacist was present. The intervention cohort comprised patients seen over 3 months when a pharmacist was present on the ACE team. Patients were excluded if there was not a documented chart note from a geriatric provider or pharmacist. Results A total of 125 patients were included in the intervention group and 106 patients in the control group. Regarding the primary outcome, the control cohort had significantly fewer identified PIMs and DRPs in comparison with the intervention cohort (P < 0.001; P < 0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference in length of stay (P = 0.317). There was a statistical difference between groups regarding 30-day readmission rates (P = 0.007). Conclusion Our study shows that the inclusion of a pharmacist on the ACE team was associated with more DRPs, and PIMs identified, creating a positive impact on patient care and 30-day readmission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药师参与老年急症护理团队:对适当用药的影响。
目前,我们的机构没有全职药剂师每天与住院的老年人急性护理(ACE)团队一起工作。我们试图评估ACE团队中临床药学服务的参与及其对适当用药的影响。目的比较ACE小组中有药师与无药师相比发现的药物相关问题(DRPs)和潜在不适当药物(PIMs)的数量。次要结局包括住院时间、30天再住院、接受药师提出的drp和pim建议。方法回顾性、单中心、队列研究。对照队列包括在没有药剂师在场的情况下观察超过3个月的患者。干预队列包括在ACE团队中有药剂师在场的情况下观察超过3个月的患者。如果没有老年医学提供者或药剂师提供的病历记录,则排除患者。结果干预组125例,对照组106例。关于主要结局,与干预组相比,对照组确定的pim和drp显著减少(P < 0.001;P < 0.01)。两组住院时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.317)。两组间30天再入院率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.007)。我们的研究表明,在ACE团队中加入一名药剂师与更多的drp和pim确定相关,对患者护理和30天再入院产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Impact of Consultant Pharmacist-Directed Anticoagulation Management in the Post-Acute and Long-Term Care (PALTC) Setting. Changing Medication Safety and Quality Improvements: Empowering Pharmacists With Data. Embracing the Changing Season: Quantifying Pharmacy's Role in Improving Medication Quality and Safety. Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: Medications for Diabetes-A Focus on Secondary Stroke Prevention. Heart Failure in Older People Part 2: Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1