Potential effect modifiers for treatment with chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation for recurrent headaches in children aged 7-14 years: development of and results from a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1186/s12998-023-00492-2
Susanne Lynge, Werner Vach, Kristina Boe Dissing, Lise Hestbaek
{"title":"Potential effect modifiers for treatment with chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation for recurrent headaches in children aged 7-14 years: development of and results from a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Susanne Lynge,&nbsp;Werner Vach,&nbsp;Kristina Boe Dissing,&nbsp;Lise Hestbaek","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00492-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effect of chiropractic manipulation in 199 children aged 7-14 years with recurrent headaches demonstrated a significant reduction of number of days with headache and a better global perceived effect (GPE) in the chiropractic manipulation group compared to a sham manipulation group. However, potential modifiers for the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation of children with recurrent headaches have never been identified. The present study is a secondary analysis of data from that RCT and will investigate potential effect modifiers for the benefit of chiropractic manipulation for children with headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen potential effect modifiers were identified from the literature and a summary index was prespecified based on clinical experience. Relevant variables were extracted from baseline questionnaires, and outcomes were obtained by means of short text messages. The modifying effect of the candidate variables was assessed by fitting interaction models to the data of the RCT. In addition, an attempt to define a new summary index was made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prespecified index showed no modifying effect. Four single variables demonstrated a treatment effect difference of more than 1 day with headache per week between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: intensity of headache (p = 0.122), Frequency of headache (p = 0.031), sleep duration (p = 0.243), and Socioeconomic status (p = 0.082). Five variables had a treatment effect difference of more than 0.7 points on the GPE scale between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: Frequency of headache (p = 0.056), Sport activity (p = 0.110), Sleep duration (p = 0.080), History of neck pain (p = 0.011), and Headache in the family (0.050). A new summary index could be constructed giving highest weight to History of neck pain and Headache in the family and Frequency of headache. The index suggests a difference of about 1 point in GPE between low and high values of the index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chiropractic manipulation offers a moderate benefit for a broad spectrum of children. However, it cannot be excluded that specific headache characteristics, family factors, or a history of neck pain may modify the effect. This question must be addressed in future studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (Albers et al in Curr Pain Headache Rep 19:3-4, 2015), identifier NCT02684916, registered 02/18/2016-retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00492-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effect of chiropractic manipulation in 199 children aged 7-14 years with recurrent headaches demonstrated a significant reduction of number of days with headache and a better global perceived effect (GPE) in the chiropractic manipulation group compared to a sham manipulation group. However, potential modifiers for the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation of children with recurrent headaches have never been identified. The present study is a secondary analysis of data from that RCT and will investigate potential effect modifiers for the benefit of chiropractic manipulation for children with headache.

Methods: Sixteen potential effect modifiers were identified from the literature and a summary index was prespecified based on clinical experience. Relevant variables were extracted from baseline questionnaires, and outcomes were obtained by means of short text messages. The modifying effect of the candidate variables was assessed by fitting interaction models to the data of the RCT. In addition, an attempt to define a new summary index was made.

Results: The prespecified index showed no modifying effect. Four single variables demonstrated a treatment effect difference of more than 1 day with headache per week between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: intensity of headache (p = 0.122), Frequency of headache (p = 0.031), sleep duration (p = 0.243), and Socioeconomic status (p = 0.082). Five variables had a treatment effect difference of more than 0.7 points on the GPE scale between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: Frequency of headache (p = 0.056), Sport activity (p = 0.110), Sleep duration (p = 0.080), History of neck pain (p = 0.011), and Headache in the family (0.050). A new summary index could be constructed giving highest weight to History of neck pain and Headache in the family and Frequency of headache. The index suggests a difference of about 1 point in GPE between low and high values of the index.

Conclusion: Chiropractic manipulation offers a moderate benefit for a broad spectrum of children. However, it cannot be excluded that specific headache characteristics, family factors, or a history of neck pain may modify the effect. This question must be addressed in future studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Albers et al in Curr Pain Headache Rep 19:3-4, 2015), identifier NCT02684916, registered 02/18/2016-retrospectively registered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按摩手法与假手法治疗7-14岁儿童复发性头痛的潜在影响调节因素:一项随机临床试验的发展和结果
背景:最近的一项随机对照试验(RCT)调查了199名7-14岁复发性头痛儿童的捏脊手法效果,结果显示,与假手法组相比,捏脊手法组头痛天数显著减少,整体感知效果(GPE)更好。然而,脊椎指压疗法治疗儿童复发性头痛的有效性的潜在调节因素从未被确定。本研究是对该随机对照试验数据的二次分析,并将探讨捏脊手法治疗儿童头痛的潜在效果调节因素。方法:从文献中找出16种潜在的疗效调节剂,并根据临床经验预先设定一个综合指标。从基线问卷中提取相关变量,并通过短信获得结果。通过拟合RCT数据的相互作用模型来评估候选变量的修改效果。此外,还尝试定义一个新的摘要索引。结果:预先设定的指标无修饰作用。4个单变量显示了治疗效果的差异:头痛强度(p = 0.122),头痛频率(p = 0.031),睡眠时间(p = 0.243)和社会经济地位(p = 0.082),每周头痛超过1天。在GPE量表的上下端,有五个变量的治疗效果差异大于0.7分:头痛频率(p = 0.056)、体育活动(p = 0.110)、睡眠时间(p = 0.080)、颈部疼痛史(p = 0.011)和家族头痛史(0.050)。可以构建一个新的综合指标,给予颈部疼痛和头痛家族史和头痛频率最高的权重。该指数表明,GPE的低值和高值之间的差异约为1点。结论:捏脊手法为广泛的儿童提供了适度的益处。然而,不能排除特定的头痛特征、家庭因素或颈部疼痛史可能会改变疗效。这个问题必须在今后的研究中加以解决。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (Albers et al . in current Pain - Headache Rep 19:3-4, 2015),标识号NCT02684916, 2016年2月18日注册,回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms of manipulation: a systematic review of the literature on immediate anatomical structural or positional changes in response to manually delivered high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation Social inequity in chiropractic utilisation - a cross-sectional study in Denmark, 2010 and 2017. Prognostic factors for long-term improvement in pain and disability among patients with persistent low back pain. A descriptive evaluation of a job analysis survey in the chiropractic profession in Switzerland - an update after more than 10 years. Towards the diagnosis of osteoporosis - contributions from coincidental diagnostic imaging findings in chiropractors' practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1