Comparison of the Spiritual Needs of Terminal Cancer Patients and Their Primary Family Caregivers.

Kyung-Ah Kang, Youngsim Choi
{"title":"Comparison of the Spiritual Needs of Terminal Cancer Patients and Their Primary Family Caregivers.","authors":"Kyung-Ah Kang,&nbsp;Youngsim Choi","doi":"10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to examine differences in Spiritual Interests Related to Illness Tool (SpIRIT) scores and the degree of spiritual needs (SNs) between patients with terminal cancer and their primary family caregivers and to compare spiritual needs between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study participants were inpatients with terminal cancer and their primary family caregivers at 40 national hospice centers. The final analysis included 120 SpIRIT surveys from patients and 115 from family members, and 99 SNs questionnaires from patients and 111 from family members. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, the t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant between-group differences in SpIRIT scores or SNs. The SpIRIT sub-dimensions that ranked high for both patients and primary family caregivers were \"maintaining positive perspective\", \"loving others\", and \"finding meaning\". The SNs sub-dimensions were ranked identically in both groups, in the order of \"love and connection\", \"hope and peace\", \"meaning and purpose\", respectively. In both groups, the recognition of the importance of spiritual matters and religion were major factors influencing SpIRIT scores and SNs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SpIRIT scores and degree of SNs of patients with terminal cancer and their primary family caregivers were found to be very closely related, and the needs for coherence and meaning were greater than religious needs. When providing spiritual care for patients with terminal illness, family members should also be considered, and their prioritization of spiritual needs and the importance of spiritual matters and religion shall be taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":73194,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"23 2","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/d4/KJHPC-23-055.PMC10332713.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine differences in Spiritual Interests Related to Illness Tool (SpIRIT) scores and the degree of spiritual needs (SNs) between patients with terminal cancer and their primary family caregivers and to compare spiritual needs between them.

Methods: The study participants were inpatients with terminal cancer and their primary family caregivers at 40 national hospice centers. The final analysis included 120 SpIRIT surveys from patients and 115 from family members, and 99 SNs questionnaires from patients and 111 from family members. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, the t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in SpIRIT scores or SNs. The SpIRIT sub-dimensions that ranked high for both patients and primary family caregivers were "maintaining positive perspective", "loving others", and "finding meaning". The SNs sub-dimensions were ranked identically in both groups, in the order of "love and connection", "hope and peace", "meaning and purpose", respectively. In both groups, the recognition of the importance of spiritual matters and religion were major factors influencing SpIRIT scores and SNs.

Conclusion: The SpIRIT scores and degree of SNs of patients with terminal cancer and their primary family caregivers were found to be very closely related, and the needs for coherence and meaning were greater than religious needs. When providing spiritual care for patients with terminal illness, family members should also be considered, and their prioritization of spiritual needs and the importance of spiritual matters and religion shall be taken into account.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症晚期患者及其主要家庭照顾者精神需求的比较
目的:本研究旨在探讨晚期癌症患者及其主要家庭照顾者在精神兴趣相关疾病工具(SpIRIT)评分和精神需求程度上的差异,并比较两者之间的精神需求。方法:研究对象为40个国家临终关怀中心的住院晚期癌症患者及其主要家庭照顾者。最终分析包括120份来自患者的SpIRIT问卷和115份来自家庭成员的SpIRIT问卷,99份来自患者的SNs问卷和111份来自家庭成员的SNs问卷。数据分析采用描述性统计、t检验、单因素方差分析和Pearson相关系数。结果:两组间SpIRIT评分、SNs无显著差异。对于患者和主要家庭照顾者来说,精神的子维度排名较高的是“保持积极的观点”、“爱他人”和“找到意义”。社交网络子维度在两组中的排名相同,分别为“爱与联系”、“希望与和平”、“意义与目的”。在两组中,对精神事物重要性的认识和宗教信仰是影响精神评分和社交网络的主要因素。结论:晚期癌症患者及其主要家庭照顾者的社交网络(SNs)的SpIRIT评分与程度密切相关,且对连贯性和意义的需求大于宗教需求。在为绝症患者提供精神关怀时,也要考虑到家属,考虑到家属对精神需求的优先顺序以及精神事务和宗教的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Personnel's Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Related to Providing Palliative Care in Persons with Chronic Diseases. Relationships among Perceptions of Dying Well, Attitudes toward Advance Directives, and Preferences for Advance Directives among Elderly Living Alone. Attitudes towards Death, Perceptions of Hospice Care, and Hospice Care Needs among Family Members of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. The Art Therapy Experiences of Patients and Their Family Members in Hospice Palliative Care. Barriers to Early Palliative Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1