Evaluation of Peripheral Versus Central Route of Ondansetron as Pretreatment to Prevent Pain on the Injection of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Deepak Kumar, Prakash K Dubey, Kunal Singh
{"title":"Evaluation of Peripheral Versus Central Route of Ondansetron as Pretreatment to Prevent Pain on the Injection of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Deepak Kumar,&nbsp;Prakash K Dubey,&nbsp;Kunal Singh","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2023.221112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated whether systemic ondansetron was also useful in the attenuation of propofol injection pain similar to ondansetron pretreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients were enrolled. Patients in group S received ondansetron 4 mg in saline in the right hand followed 30 min later by 5 mL saline in the left hand along with venous occlusion. Group L patients received 4 mL of saline in the right hand followed by 5 mL 4 mg ondansetron in the left hand after 30 min. Two minutes later the occlusion was released. Patients received one-fourth of the calculated total dose of propofol, and their level of pain was graded on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 denoting no discomfort. Mean blood pressure and heart rates were also recorded. Continuous variables were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilks test. Normal continuous variables were expressed as mean standard deviation and non-normal continuous variables were expressed as median interquartile range. T-test for the difference in the mean and paired test were used for normally distributed continuous variable whereas Mann-Whitney U test-Wilcoxon test and sign test were used for non-normally distributed variables. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used for a variable measured over different periods of time to control for the baseline effect on subsequent measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results demonstrated that both systemic administration 30 min before and local venous pretreatment with ondansetron were equally beneficial in reducing pain during propofol injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A systemic administration of ondansetron may play a role in the attenuation of propofol injection pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"51 3","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.221112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated whether systemic ondansetron was also useful in the attenuation of propofol injection pain similar to ondansetron pretreatment.

Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled. Patients in group S received ondansetron 4 mg in saline in the right hand followed 30 min later by 5 mL saline in the left hand along with venous occlusion. Group L patients received 4 mL of saline in the right hand followed by 5 mL 4 mg ondansetron in the left hand after 30 min. Two minutes later the occlusion was released. Patients received one-fourth of the calculated total dose of propofol, and their level of pain was graded on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 denoting no discomfort. Mean blood pressure and heart rates were also recorded. Continuous variables were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilks test. Normal continuous variables were expressed as mean standard deviation and non-normal continuous variables were expressed as median interquartile range. T-test for the difference in the mean and paired test were used for normally distributed continuous variable whereas Mann-Whitney U test-Wilcoxon test and sign test were used for non-normally distributed variables. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used for a variable measured over different periods of time to control for the baseline effect on subsequent measures.

Results: Our results demonstrated that both systemic administration 30 min before and local venous pretreatment with ondansetron were equally beneficial in reducing pain during propofol injection.

Conclusion: A systemic administration of ondansetron may play a role in the attenuation of propofol injection pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周途径与中枢途径奥丹司琼预防异丙酚注射疼痛的评价:一项随机对照研究。
目的:我们评估全身使用昂丹西琼是否也有助于减轻异丙酚注射疼痛,类似于昂丹西琼预处理。方法:纳入80例患者。S组患者右手给予昂丹司琼4 mg生理盐水,30 min后左手给予昂丹司琼5 mL生理盐水并静脉闭塞。L组患者于30 min后,右手生理盐水4 mL,左手昂丹司琼5 mL 4 mg, 2 min后解除闭塞。患者接受了计算总剂量的四分之一的异丙酚,他们的疼痛程度按0到3分进行分级,0表示没有不适。平均血压和心率也被记录下来。使用Shapiro-Wilks检验检验连续变量的正态性。正态连续变量用平均标准差表示,非正态连续变量用中位数四分位数范围表示。正态分布的连续变量采用均数差异t检验和配对检验,非正态分布的变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验和wilcoxon检验。重复测量方差分析用于不同时期测量的变量,以控制基线对后续测量的影响。结果:我们的研究结果表明,在异丙酚注射前30分钟全身给药和局部静脉预处理昂丹西琼对减轻疼痛同样有益。结论:全身应用昂丹司琼可减轻异丙酚注射痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Anaesthesia Management of A Patient with Airway Obstruction Caused by Prosthetic Vascular Graft Invasion into the Tracheal Lumen. Bispectral Index Guidance Reduced Target Plasma Propofol Concentration During ERCP in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl in Intraoperative Neuromuscular Monitoring Using A Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Regimen in Spine Surgeries. Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1