Description of Standardized Planes and Angles for Percutaneous Supra-acetabular Screw Placement.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2107-0948
Julian Rüwald, Milena Maria Ploeger, Gunnar T Hischebeth, Mareike Tüllmann, Jonas Roos, Martin Gathen, Koroush Kabir
{"title":"Description of Standardized Planes and Angles for Percutaneous Supra-acetabular Screw Placement.","authors":"Julian Rüwald, Milena Maria Ploeger, Gunnar T Hischebeth, Mareike Tüllmann, Jonas Roos, Martin Gathen, Koroush Kabir","doi":"10.1055/a-2107-0948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous screw fixation for pelvic fractures has become a minimally invasive alternative to an open operation. The complex anatomy of the pelvis renders this procedure challenging. The objective of this study was to assess standardized angles and dimensions of safety zones within a 3 D computed tomography model for optimal supra-acetabular screw placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography scans of 107 patients that suffered major trauma without showing any bone injury of the pelvis were collected. Using a software-based analysis, raw computed tomography data were transformed into 3 D models to set standardized landmarks and determine the possible insertion corridor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screws not exceeding a length of 97 mm in females and 106.4 mm in males were, in 95% of the evaluated cases, insertable without cortical bone penetration. The safety zone was 6.6 mm for females and 7.9 mm for males. Screws not exceeding these diameters were safely insertable in 95% of the cases. For the midsagittal plane, the angle was 36.4 ± 5.1 on the left and 34.7 ± 2.9 on the right (p = 0.008). For the anterior pelvic plane, the angle was 31.3 ± 4.5° on the left and 34.0 ± 4.8° on the right (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous fixation using supra-acetabular screws is a promising method to treat simple supra-acetabular fractures. These results may improve its safe utilization and could facilitate its broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":"419-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2107-0948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous screw fixation for pelvic fractures has become a minimally invasive alternative to an open operation. The complex anatomy of the pelvis renders this procedure challenging. The objective of this study was to assess standardized angles and dimensions of safety zones within a 3 D computed tomography model for optimal supra-acetabular screw placement.

Methods: Computed tomography scans of 107 patients that suffered major trauma without showing any bone injury of the pelvis were collected. Using a software-based analysis, raw computed tomography data were transformed into 3 D models to set standardized landmarks and determine the possible insertion corridor.

Results: Screws not exceeding a length of 97 mm in females and 106.4 mm in males were, in 95% of the evaluated cases, insertable without cortical bone penetration. The safety zone was 6.6 mm for females and 7.9 mm for males. Screws not exceeding these diameters were safely insertable in 95% of the cases. For the midsagittal plane, the angle was 36.4 ± 5.1 on the left and 34.7 ± 2.9 on the right (p = 0.008). For the anterior pelvic plane, the angle was 31.3 ± 4.5° on the left and 34.0 ± 4.8° on the right (p = 0.008).

Conclusions: Percutaneous fixation using supra-acetabular screws is a promising method to treat simple supra-acetabular fractures. These results may improve its safe utilization and could facilitate its broader clinical application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述经皮髋臼上螺钉置入的标准化平面和角度。
背景:经皮螺钉固定骨盆骨折已成为开放手术的微创替代方法。骨盆复杂的解剖结构使这一手术具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估 3 D 计算机断层扫描模型中安全区的标准化角度和尺寸,以实现最佳的髋臼上螺钉置入:方法: 收集了 107 名遭受重大创伤但骨盆未显示任何骨质损伤的患者的计算机断层扫描图像。通过软件分析,将原始计算机断层扫描数据转化为 3 D 模型,以设定标准化地标并确定可能的插入走廊:结果:在 95% 的评估病例中,女性的螺钉长度不超过 97 毫米,男性不超过 106.4 毫米,均可在不穿透皮质骨的情况下插入。安全区女性为 6.6 毫米,男性为 7.9 毫米。在 95% 的病例中,不超过这些直径的螺钉均可安全插入。在中矢状面,左侧的角度为 36.4 ± 5.1,右侧为 34.7 ± 2.9(P = 0.008)。骨盆前平面的角度左侧为 31.3 ± 4.5°,右侧为 34.0 ± 4.8°(P = 0.008):结论:使用髋臼上螺钉进行经皮固定是一种治疗简单髋臼上骨折的有效方法。结论:使用髋臼上螺钉经皮固定治疗简单的髋臼上骨折是一种很有前景的方法,这些结果可能会提高其安全性,并促进其更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
期刊最新文献
Long-term Outcomes after Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy - A Retrospective Study of 69 Patients. S2k Guideline for Tibial Plateau Fractures - Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Long-term Outcomes in Orthogeriatric Co-management: a Literature Review. Non-drainage Offers Faster Proprioceptive and Functional Recovery, and More Clinical Benefits for Patients following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Drainage. Fractures in Childhood and Young Adulthood According to Maternal Smoking in Late Pregnancy. A Danish Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1